Systems Engineering Perspectives on Technology Readiness Assessments in Software-Intensive System Development

2011 ◽  
Vol 48 (3) ◽  
pp. 738-748 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Hantos
Keyword(s):  
Systems Engineering ◽  
System Development ◽  
Technology Readiness ◽  
Intensive System ◽  
Software Intensive

scholarly journals The GRADE taxonomy for supporting decision-making of asset selection in software-intensive system development

2018 ◽  
Vol 100 ◽  
pp. 1-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Efi Papatheocharous ◽  
Krzysztof Wnuk ◽  
Kai Petersen ◽  
Séverine Sentilles ◽  
Antonio Cicchetti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
System Development ◽  
Asset Selection ◽  
Intensive System ◽  
Software Intensive

scholarly journals METAMODEL FOR SAFETY AND SECURITY INTEGRATED SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE MODELING

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 2027-2036
Author(s):  
Aschot Kharatyan ◽  
Julian Tekaat ◽  
Sergej Japs ◽  
Harald Anacker ◽  
Roman Dumitrescu
Keyword(s):  
Information And Communication Technologies ◽  
Systems Engineering ◽  
System Development ◽  
Autonomous Driving ◽  
Integrated System ◽  
Product Complexity ◽  
System Architectures ◽  
Failure Propagation ◽  
Architecture Modeling ◽  
Systemic Development

AbstractAs digitization progresses, the integration of information and communication technologies in technical systems is constantly increasing. Fascinating value potentials are emerging (e.g. autonomous driving), but also challenges in the system development. The constantly increasing product complexity and degree of networking require a systemic development, which is fulfilled by established approaches of Model-Based Systems Engineering (MBSE). To ensure the reliability of tomorrow's systems, an integrative and early consideration of security and safety is additionally required. In order to show the possibility and consequences of failures and attacks, the paper develops a modeling language that links established and partly isolated security and safety approaches within a consistent metamodel. The developer is enabled to synthesize system architectures transparently on an interdisciplinary level and to analyze attack and failure propagation integratively. The approach uncovers synergetic and especially contrasting goals and effects of architectural designs in terms of safety and security in order to make adequate architectural decisions based on trade-off analyses.

The ROI of systems engineering: Some quantitative results for software-intensive systems

2008 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 221-234 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barry Boehm ◽  
Ricardo Valerdi ◽  
Eric Honour
Keyword(s):  
Systems Engineering ◽  
Quantitative Results ◽  
Software Intensive

scholarly journals Perancangan Sistem Informasi Akademis Perguruan Tinggi Berbasis Data DIKTI/EPSBED

2011 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 771 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karto Iskandar ◽  
Reina Reina ◽  
Irma Irawati Ibrahim
Keyword(s):  
Systems Engineering ◽  
Process Design ◽  
System Development ◽  
Design System ◽  
Study Program ◽  
Business Process Design ◽  
Specific Data ◽  
Analysis And Design ◽  
Development Life Cycle ◽  
Academic Information

This research aims to help universities that do not have an academic information system and facilitate EPSBED data report to Directorate of Higher Education (DHE). The method used is the three first stages in the System Development Life Cycle (SDLC), which are systems engineering, requirements analysis, and design system. The result is a design of university business process, design of database, and design of user interface. This research finds that DHE has a specific data structure that can represent the basic activities of a study program. Therefore, this system design can be used for reporting of EPSBED data as well as for data collection of study program activities. 

Towards a Conceptual Framework for Open Systems Developments

2014 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-54 ◽  
Author(s):  
James A. Cowling ◽  
Christopher V. Morgan ◽  
Robert Cloutier
Keyword(s):  
Conceptual Framework ◽  
Open Source ◽  
Systems Engineering ◽  
Open Source Software ◽  
Open Systems ◽  
System Development ◽  
Systems Development ◽  
Software Projects ◽  
Engineering Discipline ◽  
Development Approach

The systems engineering discipline has made great strides in developing a manageable approach to system development. This is predicated on thoroughly articulating the stakeholder requirements. However, in some engineering environments, requirements are changing faster than they can be captured and realized, making this ‘traditional' form of systems engineering less tenable. An iterative system refinement approach, characterized by open systems developments, may be a more appropriate and timely response for fast-changing needs. The open systems development approach has been utilized in a number of domains including open source software, Wikipedia®, and open innovation in manufacturing. However, open systems development appears difficult to recreate successfully, and while domain tradecraft advice is often available, no engineering management methodology has emerged to improve the likelihood of success. The authors discuss the essential features of openness in these three domains and use them to propose a conceptual framework for the further exploration of the effect of governance in determining success in such open endeavors. It is the authors' hope that further research to apply this conceptual framework to open source software projects may reveal some rudimentary elements of a management methodology for environments where requirements are highly uncertain, volatile, or ‘traditional' systems engineering is otherwise sub-optimal.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document