scholarly journals Pengaruh dyadic coping terhadap kepuasan pernikahan pada pasangan menikah di Tangerang

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 420-433
Author(s):  
Soesanto Dermawan ◽  
Yonathan Aditya Goei ◽  
Kartika Chandra Kirana

Kepuasan pernikahan merupakan salah satu faktor penting dalam penelitian tentang pernikahan, karena kepuasan pernikahan banyak mempengaruhi kestabilan pernikahan. Salah satu faktor mempengaruhi kepuasan pernikahan adalah dyadic coping. Penelitian ini menguji pengaruh positive dan negative dyadic coping pada kepuasan pernikahan. Data didapatkan dari 115 pasangan. Analisa data dipandu oleh Actor-Partner Interdependence Model (APIM), sedangkan perhitungan data menggunakan multi level regression. Hasil perhitungan menunjukkan adanya pengaruh yang signifikan dari positive dyadic coping dan negative dyadic coping terhadap marital satisfaction pada actor effect, namun tidak signifikan pada partner effect.

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 420
Author(s):  
Soesanto Dermawan ◽  
Yonathan Aditya Goei ◽  
Kartika Chandra Kirana

<p>Kepuasan pernikahan merupakan salah satu faktor penting dalam penelitian tentang pernikahan, karena kepuasan pernikahan banyak mempengaruhi kestabilan pernikahan. Salah satu faktor mempengaruhi kepuasan pernikahan adalah dyadic coping. Penelitian ini menguji pengaruh positive dan negative dyadic coping pada kepuasan pernikahan. Data didapatkan dari 115 pasangan. Analisa data dipandu oleh Actor-Partner Interdependence Model (APIM), sedangkan perhitungan data menggunakan multi level regression. Hasil perhitungan menunjukkan adanya pengaruh yang signifikan dari positive dyadic coping dan negative dyadic coping terhadap marital satisfaction pada actor effect, namun tidak signifikan pada partner effect.</p>


Religions ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (11) ◽  
pp. 978
Author(s):  
Anna M. Wendołowska ◽  
Dorota Czyżowska

Some studies suggest that religious people cope better with stress. For married couples, if partners perceive their relationship as sacred, supportive dyadic coping mediates the association of sanctification with marital satisfaction and well-being. In the current study, applying the actor–partner interdependence model to 116 Polish couples (n = 232), aged between 21 and 64 (males: M = 37.8, SD = 11.8; females M = 37.1, SD = 12.0), we examined the link between centrality of religiosity and dyadic coping. Although general dyadic analyses indicate that centrality of religiosity and dyadic coping are unrelated concepts, at the subscales level, we could observe few significant relationships. The results show that Polish religious men rate their common dyadic coping low. Actor effects in women are moderated by the type of relationship (cohabitation and civil marriage vs. catholic marriage).


2020 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. 00002
Author(s):  
Dian Wisnuwardhani ◽  
Natazsa Octria Putri

Intercultural couples face cultural conflicts in their marriage, resulting in internal minor stress. Stress as a dyadic phenomenon – commonly found in marriage – affects both individuals involved in the relationship. As a result, couples experience low levels of marital satisfaction. Forty-five intercultural couples from Jakarta, Bogor, Depok, Tangerang, Bekasi Bandung, and Pekanbaru completed this study. The highlight of this study was the use of the Actor-Partner Interdependence Model in the data analysis, using the APIM_SEM application. The result from this study implied that internal minor stress affected marital satisfaction at an individual level, however, no significant effects were found in the partner-effect.&nbsp;


Author(s):  
Chiu-Yueh Hsiao ◽  
Huei-Lan Lu ◽  
Yun-Fang Tsai

Background: Although caregivers are a crucial support in the recovery of patients with schizophrenia, little is known about how mutuality is related to health-related quality of life within the dyadic (patient and caregiver) context. This study aimed to investigate the dyadic relationship between mutuality and health-related quality of life in patients with schizophrenia and caregivers. Methods: A cross-sectional, correlational study was conducted with a sample of 133 dyads of patients with schizophrenia and caregivers. Structured questionnaires were used to collect data. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, paired sample t-tests, Pearson’s product-moment correlations, and the Actor–Partner Interdependence Model. Results: Mutuality of patients was significantly higher than that of caregivers. Compared with caregivers, patients had significantly lower total scores for health-related quality of life. Patients’ and caregivers’ mutuality was related to their own health-related quality of life (actor effect) and their partners’ health-related quality of life (partner effect). Conclusion: Mutuality plays a critical role in health-related quality of life in dyads of patients with schizophrenia and caregivers. Viewing a dyad as a unit of nursing care reveals a promising approach for developing recovery-oriented modalities targeted at stimulating mutuality that may enhance health-related quality of life for both patients and caregivers.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Afarin Rajaei ◽  
Saeideh Heshmati

The present study draws attention to the significance of considering mindfulness and spiritual well-being on cancer-related distress among couples with cancer during the pandemic. Dyadic data was analyzed among couples with cancer (80 couples; N=160) to examine the within-person (actor effects) and between-partner (partner effects) associations among links between mindfulness, spiritual well-being, and cancer-related distress through the use of the actor-partner interdependence model (APIM; Kashy &amp; Kenny, 2000). Significant actor and/or partner effects were found for mindfulness and spiritual well-being in couples with cancer, a factor that predicted cancer-related distress. Spirituality seemed to only play an important role in patients’ own cancer-related distress (actor effect), with patients’ higher levels of spiritual well-being predicting patients’ lower levels of distress. On the other hand, mindfulness was not only significantly related to the cancer patient and partner’s own distress (actor effect), partner’s mindfulness was also significantly associated with the patient’s distress (partner effect). The findings underscore the need to adopt a systemic perspective that accounts for multiple, simultaneous adaptive processes including mindfulness and spiritual well-being as influences on cancer-related distress in the time of COVID-19.


2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 563-584 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ercole Vellone ◽  
Misook L. Chung ◽  
Rosaria Alvaro ◽  
Marco Paturzo ◽  
Federica Dellafiore

Mutuality in patient–caregiver dyad may improve heart failure (HF) patient self-care and caregiver contribution to self-care, but literature is scarce. We evaluated the influence of mutuality and its dimensions on patient–caregiver dyad self-care. A sample of 366 HF patient–caregiver dyads was enrolled. The Actor–Partner Interdependence Model was used to identify the influence of individual patient and caregiver mutuality on their own self-care (actor effect) and on partner self-care (partner effect). The total mutuality score had an actor effect on patient self-care maintenance (i.e., behaviors aimed at maintaining HF stability) and on patient and caregiver self-care confidence. Total score of patient mutuality also had a partner effect on caregiver self-care management (i.e., responses to symptoms of HF exacerbation). Specific mutuality dimensions had different actor and partner effects on patient and caregiver self-care. Interventions to improve mutuality in HF patient–caregiver dyads may influence patient self-care and caregiver contribution to self-care.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Thomas ◽  
Lauren Micalizzi ◽  
Samuel N. Meisel ◽  
Dayna Price ◽  
Anthony Spirito

Although siblings are conceptualized as a salient social influence during adolescence, few studies have examined how adolescent siblings influence each other’s substance use and risky sexual behavior. This study’s objective was to investigate the influence of alcohol use days, cannabis use days, and cannabis and alcohol co-use days on the sexual risk behavior of siblings while accounting for dyadic influence. At the baseline visit for a randomized controlled trial for adolescents referred due to parents’ concerns about their substance use (“referred adolescents”; n=99; Mage=15.95), we assessed alcohol and cannabis use days as well as sexual risk behavior of the referred adolescents and their sibling (Mage=15.03). We computed the number of days in the 30 days prior to the baseline that alcohol and cannabis use occurred on the same day. Using a cross-sectional actor partner interdependence model, we tested two models of how adolescents’ substance use is associated with their own (“actor effect”) and their siblings’ (“partner effect”) sexual risk behavior—one model for alcohol and cannabis use, and one model for co-use. Results indicated for referred adolescents and their siblings, within an individual, greater alcohol, cannabis, and co-use was significantly associated with sexual risk behavior (actor effects). Furthermore, more sibling co-use days were positively associated with referred adolescent sexual risk behavior (partner effect), representing interdependence. These findings confirm the influence siblings have on one another’s risky behavior in adolescence and have implications for prevention and intervention efforts for adolescent substance use.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document