scholarly journals Adverb formation process in Albanian and Bodo Languages: A comparative study

2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (5 S) ◽  
pp. 1842-1850
Author(s):  
Ruhan Güçlü
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Formation Process

scholarly journals The comparative study between Indonesian blend words and English blend words

LingTera ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Mia Rahmannia ◽  
Pratomo Widodo
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Formation Process ◽  
Qualitative Method ◽  
Word Formation ◽  
Journal Articles ◽  
Similarities And Differences ◽  
The Difference ◽  
The Comparative Study ◽  
Descriptive Qualitative

Generally, blending can be defined as combining two clipped words. Kvetko in Bednarova defines blending as a word formation process similar to shortening combined with merging two different words. There are many types of blending words both in Indonesian and English context. Therefore, the aim of this research is to analyze the comparison between Indonesian blend words and English blend words in terms of its types, its similarities and differences and also how its formed. In this paper the researcher use descriptive qualitative method as the method of the research. The source of the data is taken from some journal articles that relevant with blend words both in Indonesian and English context. The result showed that Indonesian blend words and English blend words not only have similarities in the forming word, but also have their differences that make them unique to each other. The writer hopes that the reader of this article gets more information about both Indonesian and English blend words based on its types and the similarities and the difference between them.

scholarly journals A Comparative Study on Speculation Forms of Interrogative Sentences in Korean and Japanese

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 71-85
Author(s):  
Chang-Hak MOON
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Formation Process ◽  
Rhetorical Questions

This article reveals the interrogative aspect of speculation forms in Japanese and Korean, including the characteristics of -keyss-nya in Korean and darooka in Japanese. -keyss-nya and darooka by definition indicate meanings of both “speculation” and “interrogation”, and thus it is anticipated that the semantic characteristics of these forms will not differ significantly. However, one perceives many differences when examining the semantic characteristics of both. First, a characteristic of -keyss-nya is its <listener-oriented interrogative sentences> with strong communicativity, whereas a characteristic of darooka is its <speaker-oriented interrogative sentences> with weak communicativity. Second, based on this characteristic of <listener-oriented interrogative sentences>, -keyss-nya is not made into “question usage that does not solicit an answer” or “exclamation usage,” but it may be made into “strong rhetorical questions.” Meanwhile, based on the characteristic of <speaker-oriented interrogative questions> with weak communicativity, darooka may be derived into “question usage that does not solicit an answer”, “exclamation usage”, and “weak rhetorical interrogative sentences.” As stated above, different semantic meanings of -keyss-nya and darooka result from semantic differences between -keyss- and daroo. The -keyss- meaning of “completion of judgement formation” is reflected in -keyss-nya’s characteristics of <listener-oriented interrogative sentences>, and daroo’s meaning of the “judgement formation process” is reflected in darooka’s characteristics of <speaker-oriented interrogative sentences>.

Comparative study of the soot formation process in a “nucleation” and a “sooting” low pressure premixed methane flame

2017 ◽  
Vol 184 ◽  
pp. 153-166 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pascale Desgroux ◽  
Alessandro Faccinetto ◽  
Xavier Mercier ◽  
Thomas Mouton ◽  
Damien Aubagnac Karkar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Formation Process ◽  
Soot Formation ◽  
Low Pressure ◽  
Methane Flame

scholarly journals A Comparative Study of Euphemism and Dysphemism in English and Arabic with Special Reference to Political Discourse

2014 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 259-268
Author(s):  
Sarab Kadir Mugair
Keyword(s):  
Social Construction ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Information Transmission ◽  
Special Reference ◽  
Formation Process ◽  
Political Leaders ◽  
Cooperative Principle ◽  
Objective World ◽  
Control Information ◽  
Linguistic Phenomenon

This study aims at analyzing euphemisms in English and Arabic. Euphemisms address culturally sensitive areas and this is why they have not received a lot of academic attention from applied linguists in general and sociolinguists in particular. The study begins by listing the ways of forming euphemism in both English and Arabic. Then it sheds light on English Political euphemism for being a tool for political leaders to control information transmission. Based on some examples, this paper summarises three features which distinguish political euphemism from others. Then, it discusses pragmatically how political euphemism violates all the maxims of Grice's cooperative principle. We briefly discuss dysphemism and in which way its formation process is similar and different from euphemism. Such study of this linguistic phenomenon provides a proof that language is not only a reflection of the objective world but a process of social construction.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document