scholarly journals Development of innovative industries in Russia under unfavourable external environment

Equilibrium ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 467-485 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vladislav Spitsin ◽  
Alexander Mikhalchuk ◽  
Natalia Chistyakova ◽  
Lubov Spitsyna ◽  
Irina Pavlova
Keyword(s):  
External Environment ◽  
Value Added ◽  
Innovative Development ◽  
Development Patterns ◽  
Russian Economy ◽  
Industrial Sectors ◽  
Foreign Countries ◽  
High Level ◽  
Structural Indicators ◽  
Regions Of Russia

Research background: Innovative development of industries and regions in Russia during the period 2005–2011 has not brought significant positive results. Innovative activity of regions and industries remained at a low level. After a relatively stable 2012–2013, the Russian economy faced the geopolitical crisis and economic sanctions in 2014–2015. Purpose of the article: The primary purpose of this study is to investigate the innovative development patterns of industrial sectors in selected Russian regions in the years 2012–2015, which include the period of negative external environment (2014–2015) for the national economy. Methods: The study enhances the analysis of statistical data and applies quantitative analysis methods (variance analysis). The research focuses on 14 regions of Russia, members of the Association of Innovative Regions of Russia (AIRR) and 2 specific industries: section D «Manufacturing» and subsection DL «Manufacture of electrical and optical equipment» which usually manifest high level of innovative economic activity. Findings & Value added: The research results show that the crisis period of 2014–2015 has not stimulated the increased innovative activities for both industries. The innovative sector (section D) grew faster than the non-innovative one in 2013, but this advantage became insignificant in 2014–2015. Some signs of revival for innovative enterprises in subsection DL were observed during the crises beginning in 2014, but this trend was not retained in 2015. The analysis of structural indicators (proportions) of the innovative sector shows that only a few AIRR regions have values comparable to the leading European countries. Most of the AIRR regions lag behind the leading foreign countries specifically on the «Share of enterprises engaged in technological innovation» and «Share of new or significantly improved products» Indicators. The study did not reveal the statistically significant positive dynamics of these indicators in the AIRR regions over the period 2013–2015.

scholarly journals Russian economy innovative development scenarios

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 31-40
Author(s):  
Vera A. Vasyaycheva ◽  
Galina A. Sakhabieva ◽  
Tatjana D. Kovalenko
Keyword(s):  
Industrial Revolution ◽  
Innovative Activity ◽  
Digital Culture ◽  
Innovative Development ◽  
Innovation Ecosystem ◽  
Managerial Decisions ◽  
Development Scenarios ◽  
Russian Economy ◽  
Technological Leadership ◽  
High Level

The unfolding fourth industrial revolution sets global goals for the world community, requiring the implementation of systemic transformations in all spheres of human activity. Preparations for securing Russia's technological leadership began a long time ago. However, the measures being taken are not enough to build an integral innovation ecosystem, which would make it possible to organize at a high level the building up of innovative potential, its effective use and increase the country's competitiveness in a dynamically changing environment. The key problems of the shortage of expected effects include the lack of formation of the competitive market, the low potential of domestic research in the field of improving strategic planning and methodological tools for making managerial decisions, poor management at all levels of the production hierarchy, the low degree of interest of economic entities in innovative transformation and investment in changing organizational and managerial structures. The paper analyzes the scenario conditions that determine the formation of an innovative economy and the improvement of the country's rating at the global level. The main factors that maximally affect the resulting indicators of innovative activity are investigated. Predictive models of innovative development have been constructed depending on the intensity of changes in factors sensitive to variations in world trends. The need for a systemic restructuring of the traditional economic order is argued. Scientific and practical recommendations on increasing innovative activity and improving the digital culture of the subjects of the Russian economy, taking into account the existing opportunities and potential of world leadership, are proposed.

Innovative Development of Ship Repair Enterprises in the Framework of the SeafaringActivities of the CoastalRegion of the Arctic Zone of Russia.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
T.V. Turchaninova ◽  
◽  
V.E. Khrapov ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Market Economy ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Innovative Development ◽  
Arctic Zone ◽  
Russian Economy ◽  
Foreign Countries ◽  
Murmansk Region ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Ship Repair

The monograph explores the theoretical and methodological foundations in the innovative development of entrepreneurial structures in market economy countries. The economic mechanisms of innovative development in foreign countries and the results of their adaptation in the Russian economy are considered.UsingtheexampleofsomeregionsoftheArcticzoneofRussia,theauthorsanalyzedtheeconomicmechanismsofinnovativedevelopmentofbusinessstructures,andalsoproposedconceptualapproachestospatialinteractionofvariousenterprisesofthefishingindustryinthedevelopmentoflivingnaturalresources. The Murmansk region, which is completely part of the Arctic zone of the Russian Federation, was studied with special attention.Theauthorsarguethatbeforethetransitiontothedigitaleconomy,adeeporganizationalrestructuringofregionalbusinessstructuresisnecessaryinordertoincreasetheirefficiencyandobtainasynergisticeffectwhenusingregionalpotential.Asaresult,theauthorsproposedtwoconceptualapproachestotheinnovativedevelopmentofshiprepairenterprisesinthecoastalregion:withintheframeworkofthefishingfleetandwithintheframeworkofthe“IndustrialTechnopark”.Theauthorsproposedaprojectforthedevelopmentofship-repairenterprisesinvolvedinthemaritimeactivitiesoftheRussiancoastalregionoftheArcticzone,whichmaybeofinteresttoregionalauthorities,managersandspecialistsofship-repairenterpriseswhenpreparingtheirowndevelopmentstrategy.

scholarly journals Geostrategic Border Territories of Russia: Small and Medium Business

Federalism ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 169-186
Author(s):  
А. V. Vilenskiy
Keyword(s):  
Economic Growth ◽  
Significant Part ◽  
Border Regions ◽  
Cross Border ◽  
Russian Economy ◽  
Foreign Countries ◽  
Entrepreneurial Climate ◽  
Border Areas ◽  
Cross Border Cooperation ◽  
Regions Of Russia

Potentially, the participation of small and medium-sized businesses in cross-border cooperation in the border regions of the country should intensify its development, bring specificity to it. However, the analysis showed that there is no noticeable specificity in the dynamics of employment in the field of small and medium-sized businesses in non-priority geostrategic border areas in comparison with other regions of Russia, incl. the crisis year 2020. As in the country as a whole, the development of small and medium-sized businesses in these border areas is difficult, unstable, multidirectional, moreover, in line with the longterm tendency towards its curtailment. Against the background of a generally unfavorable economic, including entrepreneurial, climate, the specifics of the functioning of small and medium-sized businesses in the border areas are hardly distinguishable. This lack of distinction confirms the low estimates of the degree of openness of the Russian economy, the fact that a significant part of the border regions are depressed. With a low level of openness, the potential opportunities from cross-border and other economic cooperation with foreign countries in such Russian territories are poorly realized and play a secondary role. Nonpriority border regions to a greater extent perform “barrier functions” due to geostrategic reasons, rather than the functions of economic growth points.

scholarly journals Resilience factors in the Russian economy: The comparative analysis for 2000–2020

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (8) ◽  
pp. 1412-1432
Author(s):  
Viktoriya V. AKBERDINA
Keyword(s):  
Capital Mobility ◽  
Global Financial Crisis ◽  
Import Substitution ◽  
Value Added ◽  
Industrial Sector ◽  
Russian Economy ◽  
Industrial Sectors ◽  
Macroeconomic Indicators ◽  
Resilience Factors ◽  
The Impact

Subject. The study investigates the impact of shocks on the economic dynamics during recurring crises. Nevertheless, the impact of exogenous shocks may turn to be minor for GDP of some countries, while they cause unfavorable consequences for the economic development of others. Objectives. I herein identify factors of resilience in the Russian economy, referring to three different crises that took place in 2000–2020, by conducting a theoretical overview of the concept Economic Resilience and resilience factors of economic systems against different shocks. Methods. The decomposition of macroeconomic indicators is the principal method of research. The resilience of the Russian economy and other advanced economies was assessed by macroeconomic indicators related to trends in GDP and the unemployment level. I point out two groups of factors – the innate and acquired (adaptability). Results. During the global financial crisis in 2008, the Russian economy demonstrated its innate factors, such as the availability of considerable reserves and capital mobility between the financial and industrial sectors, as well as adaptive factors as part of the national anti-crisis policy. During the period of sanctions, the resilience of the Russian economy stemmed from the enormous potential of the industrial sector and R&D, considerable reserves for production development, which underlay the import substitution policy. Finally, in the outbreak of the 2020 crisis, Russia managed to handle the crisis much better than the leading countries of the world, since there is a prevalence of State-owned large business and the domestic localization of value added chains. Conclusions and Relevance. The study substantiated the objectivity of resilience factors of the Russian economy during multiple crises, i.e. a combination of financial, commercial, political and pandemic crises.

Atlas of economic complexity, Russian regional pages

2018 ◽  
pp. 71-91 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. L. Lyubimov ◽  
M. V. Lysyuk ◽  
M. A. Gvozdeva
Keyword(s):  
Value Added ◽  
Growth Strategy ◽  
Gdp Per Capita ◽  
Export Diversification ◽  
Russian Regions ◽  
Economic Complexity ◽  
Diversification Strategies ◽  
Central Regions ◽  
Per Capita ◽  
Regions Of Russia

Well-established results indicate that export diversification might be a better growth strategy for an emerging economy as long as its GDP per capita level is smaller than an empirically defined threshold. As average incomes in Russian regions are likely to be far below the threshold, it might be important to estimate their diversification potential. The paper discusses the Atlas of economic complexity for Russian regions created to visualize regional export baskets, to estimate their complexity and evaluate regional export potential. The paper’s results are consistent with previous findings: the complexity of export is substantially higher and diversification potential is larger in western and central regions of Russia. Their export potential might become larger if western and central regions, first, try to join global value added chains and second, cooperate and develop joint diversification strategies. Northern and eastern regions are by contrast much less complex and their diversification potential is small.

Researching the impact of venture investment on the innovative development of the Russian economy

2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (11) ◽  
pp. 2643-2657
Author(s):  
K.A. Trubinova ◽  
◽  
V.P. Postnikov ◽  
M.M. Gulyaeva ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Innovative Development ◽  
Russian Economy ◽  
Venture Investment ◽  
The Impact

EVALUATION OF THE COMMON HOP VARIETY SAMPLES ACCORDING TO THE PHENOLOGICAL AND MORPHOLOGICAL FEATURES

2018 ◽  
pp. 40-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
А. А. Fadeev ◽  
Z. А. Nikonova
Keyword(s):  
Morphological Characteristics ◽  
Economic Importance ◽  
Morphological Features ◽  
High Yield ◽  
Early Maturity ◽  
Foreign Countries ◽  
Humulus Lupulus L ◽  
The Common ◽  
Regions Of Russia ◽  
Vegetative Season

The results of study of the 12 year cycle of studies on the only in Russia collection of hops ordinary (Humulus lupulus L.), which contains 250 samples from different regions of Russia and 17 foreign countries. The number of process varieties, composition and origin, it is unique and corresponds to world level. A collection of accessions of hops is a population of female plants with a set of phenological, morphological and economic importance of signs. In the article, the estimation of the collectible varieties of hops at different ripeness groups according to phenological and morphological characteristics according to the method of test for distinctness, uniformity and stability. As the result of the research the Common Hop (Humuluslupulus) sorts were classified in accordance with their maturity time as early maturity (less than 100 days) – 10%, middle-early (101…110 days) – 14, middle duration (111…120 days) – 40, middle-late (121…130 days) – 10% and slow-maturing (more than 130 days) – 26%. Each group has a phenotypic and morphologies features. The early maturity, middle-early and middle duration varieties with vegetative season approximately 120 days are more adaptive to the conditions of the Chuvashia and central part of the Russia and provide obtaining high yield of the hop cones.

Regularities of development small entrepreneurship in regions 2015-2018

2019 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 73-80
Author(s):  
I. S. Pinkovetskaia
Keyword(s):  
Initial Data ◽  
Statistical Data ◽  
Russian Economy ◽  
Business Structures ◽  
Regions Of Russia ◽  
Legal Entities

The aim of the study, the results of which are given in this paper, was to assess the saturation of the Russian economy with business structures. Statistical data for 2015 and 2017 were used as initial data. The indicators characterizing activity of subjects small entrepreneurship (legal entities and individual entrepreneurs) in regions of Russia are presented.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document