Effect of Cyclic Loading on Marginal Adaptation and Bond Strength in Direct vs Indirect Class II MO Composite Restorations

2008 ◽  
Vol 33 (5) ◽  
pp. 587-592 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Aggarwal ◽  
A. Logani ◽  
V. Jain ◽  
N. Shah
Keyword(s):  
Cyclic Loading ◽  
Bond Strength ◽  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Marginal Adaptation ◽  
Microtensile Bond Strength ◽  
Composite Restorations ◽  
Indirect Composite

Clinical Relevance Indirect composite restorations have better marginal adaptation than direct composite restorations, and cyclic loading has a more deteriorating effect on the marginal adaptation and microtensile bond strength of direct composite restorations than indirect composite restorations.

The Effect of the Presence and Presentation Mode of Co-Initiators on the Microtensile Bond Strength of Dual-Cured Adhesive Systems Used in Indirect Restorations

10.2341/08-18 ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 33 (6) ◽  
pp. 682-689 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. C. S. X. B. Cavalcanti ◽  
C. A. G. Arais ◽  
M. T. Oliveira ◽  
M. Giannini
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Presentation Mode ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Microtensile Bond Strength ◽  
Bonding Agents ◽  
Composite Restorations ◽  
Indirect Composite

Clinical Relevance The presentation mode of co-initiators added to bonding agents may affect the bond strength of indirect composite restorations to dentin.

scholarly journals Evaluation of the Bond Strength and Marginal Seal of Indirect Restorations of Composites Bonded with Preheating Resin

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (04) ◽  
pp. 644-650
Author(s):  
Manuel Salvador Urcuyo Alvarado ◽  
Diana María Escobar García ◽  
Amaury de Jesús Pozos Guillén ◽  
Juan Carlos Flores Arriaga ◽  
Gabriel Fernando Romo Ramírez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Statistical Analysis ◽  
Bond Strength ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Microtensile Bond Strength ◽  
Composite Restorations ◽  
Adhesive Interface ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Indirect Composite ◽  
Cementing Agent

Abstract Objective Preheated resins (PR) are considered a cementing agent option for indirect adhesive restorations of composite inlays and onlays. The objective of this in vitro study was to evaluate the marginal sealing, adhesive interface, and microtensile bond strength of indirect adhesive restorations of composites in terms of dentin cemented with PR. Materials and Methods Standardized Class II preparations were performed on 30 extracted human premolars, impressions were taken, and indirect composite restorations were manufactured. In total, 15 restorations were cemented with PR (ENA HRi, SYNCA), and 15 restorations were cemented with self-adhesive resinous cement (RC) (Relyx U200, 3M ESPE), followed by a thermocycling regime. After that, these were segmented sagittally and longitudinally to evaluate the marginal sealing and the adhesive interface with scanning electron microscopy and confocal microscopy. Microtensile bond strength was assessed with a mechanical device (TA. XT Plus C, Stable Micro System). Statistical analysis Statistical analysis was conducted using the two-sample Student’s t-test. Results The results showed that there is no statistically significant difference in the degree of microfiltration using PR or RC; however, microtensile bond strength is greater when the restoration is cemented with RC (278.75 N/cm3) than with PR (144.49 N/cm3), and better adjustment and sealing were observed for composite restorations with PR. Conclusion PR comprise an alternative cementing agent for indirect composite restorations in Class II cavities in premolars.

scholarly journals Microtensile bond strength of indirect composite restorations using different combinations of resin coating technique

2012 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Albert David Correa Medina ◽  
Andréia Bolzan Paula ◽  
Regina Maria Puppin-Rontani ◽  
Fabiana Scarparo Naufel ◽  
Mario Alexandre Coelho Sinhoreti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Microtensile Bond Strength ◽  
Coating Technique ◽  
Composite Restorations ◽  
Resin Coating ◽  
Indirect Composite

Effect of Cyclic Loading on the Bond Strength of Class II Restorations with Different Composite Materials

10.2341/07-65 ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 163-168 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. N. Cavalcanti ◽  
F. H. O. Mitsui ◽  
F. Silva ◽  
A. R. Peris ◽  
A. Bedran-Russo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Composite Materials ◽  
Cyclic Loading ◽  
Bond Strength ◽  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Clinical Situation ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Selection Of

Clinical Relevance New resin composite technologies, such as nano-filled-based systems, have been developed. The assessment of such materials in a simulated laboratory chewing condition may assist with the selection of composites in a clinical situation.

scholarly journals Effect of loading on the microtensile bond strength and microleakage of a self-etching and etch-and-rinse adhesive in direct class II MOD composite restorations in vitro

2012 ◽  
Vol 31 (6) ◽  
pp. 924-932 ◽  
Author(s):  
Theodora BRAVIS ◽  
Peter PILECKI ◽  
Ron F. WILSON ◽  
Michael FENLON ◽  
Timothy F. WATSON ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Microtensile Bond Strength ◽  
Composite Restorations ◽  
Etch And Rinse

Influence of Beveling and Ultrasound Application on Marginal Adaptation of Box-only Class II (slot) Resin Composite Restorations

10.2341/06-84 ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 291-297 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. R. Schmidlin ◽  
K. Wolleb ◽  
T. Imfeld ◽  
M. Gygax ◽  
A. Lussi
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Marginal Adaptation ◽  
Composite Restorations ◽  
Ultrasound Application

Clinical Relevance Beveling box-only Class II cavities is necessary to improve the marginal quality of restorations. Where beveling is impossible or difficult to achieve, ultrasound may improve marginal quality.

scholarly journals Comparison of Proximal Contacts of Class II Resin Composite Restorations In Vitro

2006 ◽  
Vol 31 (6) ◽  
pp. 688-693 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. A. C. Loomans ◽  
N. J. M. Opdam ◽  
F. J. M. Roeters ◽  
E. M. Bronkhorst ◽  
R. C. W. Burgersdijk
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Composite Restorations ◽  
Composite Restoration

Clinical Relevance When placing a Class II resin composite restoration, the use of sectional matrix systems and separation rings to obtain tight proximal contacts is recommended.

Gingival Microleakage of Class II Resin Composite Restorations with Fiber Inserts

10.2341/06-86 ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 298-305 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. El-Mowafy ◽  
W. El-Badrawy ◽  
A. Eltanty ◽  
K. Abbasi ◽  
N. Habib
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Composite Restorations ◽  
Fiber Inserts

Clinical Relevance Fiber inserts incorporated at the gingival floor of Class II composite restorations resulted in a significant reduction of microleakage scores as compared to restorations made without inserts. This may lead to a reduced incidence of recurrent caries.

Factors Associated with Microleakage in Class II Resin Composite Restorations

10.2341/06-16 ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 60-66 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Idriss ◽  
T. Abduljabbar ◽  
C. Habib ◽  
R. Omar
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Gap Size ◽  
Marginal Gap ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Composite Restorations ◽  
Placement Technique

Clinical Relevance Even though marginal gap size was not shown to be a direct predictor for the extent of microleakage in resin composite restorations, both material and placement technique appear to be important determinants in microleakage and, thus, probably in clinical outcomes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document