scholarly journals Load Capability of Excessively Flared Teeth Restored with Fiber-reinforced Composite Posts and All-ceramic Crowns

2006 ◽  
Vol 31 (6) ◽  
pp. 699-704 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Naumann ◽  
A. Preuss ◽  
R. Frankenberger
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Fracture Resistance ◽  
Fiber Reinforced ◽  
Endodontically Treated Teeth ◽  
Fiber Reinforced Composite ◽  
Reinforced Composite ◽  
All Ceramic ◽  
Ceramic Crowns

Clinical Relevance The fracture resistance of excessively flared endodontically-treated teeth (ETT) without ferrule preparation is not acceptable. Adhesively luted FRC posts with 2 mm ferrule are recommended.

Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth Restored With Bulk Fill, Bulk Fill Flowable, Fiber-reinforced, and Conventional Resin Composite

2016 ◽  
Vol 41 (5) ◽  
pp. E131-E140 ◽  
Author(s):  
C Atalay ◽  
AR Yazici ◽  
A Horuztepe ◽  
E Nagas ◽  
A Ertan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Resistance ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Positive Control ◽  
Negative Control ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Fiber Reinforced ◽  
Endodontically Treated Teeth ◽  
Fiber Reinforced Composite ◽  
Reinforced Composite ◽  
Group I

SUMMARY The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with different types of restorative resins. Methods and Materials: Seventy-two sound maxillary premolar teeth were randomly divided into six groups (n=12). The teeth in the first group were left intact and tested as unprepared negative control (group I) specimens. The teeth in the remaining five groups were prepared with MOD cavities and endodontically treated. The teeth in one of the five groups (positive control group II) were unrestored. The rest of the prepared cavities were restored as follows: group III: bulk fill resin composite/Filtek Bulk Fill (3M ESPE); group IV: bulk fill flowable resin composite + nanohybrid/SureFil SDR Flow + Ceram.X Mono (Dentsply); group V: fiber-reinforced composite + posterior resin composite/GC everX posterior + G-aenial posterior (GC Corp.); and group VI: nanohybrid resin composite/Tetric N-Ceram (Ivoclar/Vivadent). Each restorative material was used with its respective adhesive system. The restored teeth were stored in distilled water for 24 hours at 37°C and were then thermocycled (5-55°C, 1000×). Specimens were subjected to a compressive load until fracture at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. The data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance followed by the post hoc Tukey honestly significantly different test (p<0.05). Results: Sound premolar teeth (group I negative control) showed significantly higher fracture resistance than did the other tested groups (p<0.05). No statistically significant differences were found in the fracture resistance values of the restored groups (groups III, IV, V, and VI) (p>0.05). The lowest values were obtained in the positive control group (group II); these values were significantly lower than those of the other groups (p<0.05). Conclusion: The fracture resistance values of endodontically treated teeth restored with either bulk fill/bulk fill flowable or fiber-reinforced composite were not different from those restored with conventional nanohybrid resin composite.

scholarly journals Introduction to Fiber Reinforced Composite (FRC) Post, A New Era in Reinforcing Esthetics: A Case Report

2013 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-48
Author(s):  
CM Jan ◽  
F Rashid ◽  
NA Nomann ◽  
AJ Rashid
Keyword(s):  
Root Canal ◽  
Significant Loss ◽  
Fiber Reinforced ◽  
Endodontically Treated Teeth ◽  
New Era ◽  
Fiber Reinforced Composite ◽  
Maxillary Central Incisor ◽  
Tooth Structure ◽  
Reinforced Composite ◽  
Endodontically Treated Tooth

The restoration of a root canal treated or, endodontically treated teeth, is often can be achieved with post and core because of the significant loss of tooth structure. Until the mid-1980s, the safest way to restore an endodontically treated tooth was considered to be the cast-metal post, made indirectly by a dental technician. Also prefabricated metal posts in combination with different core materials under artificial crowns were used. The development and use of fiber reinforced composite (FRC) root canal posts over metallic posts make possible of the attachment & reinforcement of the crown with maximum esthetics. This paper illustrates a technique for rehabilitation of an endodontically treated maxillary central incisor of both sides (UL1 & UR1) with a fiber reinforced composite post (FRC post) & discusses the advantages, disadvantages of metallic post over fiber reinforced composite (FRC) posts.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/bjdre.v3i1.16595 Bangladesh Journal of Dental Research & Education Vol.3(1) 2013: 45-48

Fracture Resistance of CAD/CAM-Fabricated Fiber-Reinforced Composite Denture Retainers

2013 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 381-383 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kohji Nagata ◽  
Noriyuki Wakabayashi ◽  
Hidekazu Takahashi ◽  
Pekka K Vallittu ◽  
Lippo VJ Lassila
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Resistance ◽  
Fiber Reinforced ◽  
Fiber Reinforced Composite ◽  
Reinforced Composite ◽  
Cad Cam

scholarly journals Surface Treatments for Improving Bond Strength to Prefabricated Fiber Posts: A Literature Review

10.2341/07-86 ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 346-355 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Monticelli ◽  
R. Osorio ◽  
F. T. Sadek ◽  
I. Radovic ◽  
M. Toledano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Literature Review ◽  
Bond Strength ◽  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Surface Treatments ◽  
Fiber Reinforced ◽  
Resin Cements ◽  
Adhesion Mechanism ◽  
Fiber Reinforced Composite ◽  
Fiber Posts ◽  
Reinforced Composite

Clinical Relevance Several surface treatments have been proposed for improving the bonding of resin cements or core materials to FRC (fiber-reinforced composite) posts. The possibility of combining chemical and micromechanical retention on post surface provides the most promising adhesion mechanism.

scholarly journals Evaluating the fracture resistance of fiber reinforced composite restorations - An in vitro analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 138 ◽  
Author(s):  
ArunKumar Patnana ◽  
NarasimhaRao V. Vanga ◽  
Rajasekhar Vabbalareddy ◽  
SrinivasKumar Chandrabhatla
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Resistance ◽  
Fiber Reinforced ◽  
Fiber Reinforced Composite ◽  
Composite Restorations ◽  
Reinforced Composite ◽  
Vitro Analysis ◽  
In Vitro Analysis
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document