scholarly journals The Association Between Dietary Sodium Intake, ESRD, and All-Cause Mortality in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes

Diabetes Care ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 861-866 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. C. Thomas ◽  
J. Moran ◽  
C. Forsblom ◽  
V. Harjutsalo ◽  
L. Thorn ◽  
...  
2013 ◽  
Vol 124 (10) ◽  
pp. 617-626 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chris Tikellis ◽  
Raelene J. Pickering ◽  
Despina Tsorotes ◽  
Valma Harjutsalo ◽  
Lena Thorn ◽  
...  

It is recommended that individuals with diabetes restrict their dietary sodium intake. However, although salt intake is correlated with BP (blood pressure), it also partly determines the activation state of the RAAS (renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system), a key mediator of diabetes-associated atherosclerosis. apoE KO (apolipoprotein E knockout) mice were allocated for the induction of diabetes with streptozotocin or citrate buffer (controls) and further randomized to isocaloric diets containing 0.05%, 0.3% or 3.1% sodium with or without the ACEi [ACE (angiotensin-converting enzyme) inhibitor] perindopril. After 6 weeks of study, plaque accumulation was quantified and markers of atherogenesis were assessed using RT–PCR (reverse transcription–PCR) and ELISA. The association of sodium intake and adverse cardiovascular and mortality outcomes were explored in 2648 adults with Type 1 diabetes without prior CVD (cardiovascular disease) from the FinnDiane study. A 0.05% sodium diet was associated with increased plaque accumulation in diabetic apoE KO mice, associated with activation of the RAAS. By contrast, a diet containing 3.1% sodium suppressed atherogenesis associated with suppression of the RAAS, with an efficacy comparable with ACE inhibition. In adults with Type 1 diabetes, low sodium intake was also associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality and new-onset cardiovascular events. However, high sodium intake was also associated with adverse outcomes, leading to a J-shaped relationship overall. Although BP lowering is an important goal for the management of diabetes, off-target actions to activate the RAAS may contribute to an observed lack of protection from cardiovascular complications in patients with Type 1 diabetes with low sodium intake.


2017 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 138-142 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jemma Anderson ◽  
Jennifer J Couper ◽  
Sarah Toome ◽  
Christine Mpundu-Kaambwa ◽  
Lynne C Giles ◽  
...  

Diabetes ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 67 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 618-P
Author(s):  
GIUSEPPE PENNO ◽  
MONIA GAROFOLO ◽  
ROSA GIANNARELLI ◽  
FABRIZIO CAMPI ◽  
DANIELA LUCCHESI ◽  
...  

Diabetes ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 67 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1694-P
Author(s):  
MONIA GAROFOLO ◽  
ALESSANDRA BERTOLOTTO ◽  
FABRIZIO CAMPI ◽  
DANIELA LUCCHESI ◽  
LAURA GIUSTI ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marga A.g. Helmink ◽  
Marieke de Vries ◽  
Frank L.j. Visseren ◽  
Wendela L. de Ranitz ◽  
Harold W. de Valk ◽  
...  

Objective: To identify determinants associated with insulin resistance and to assess the association between insulin resistance and cardiovascular events, vascular interventions and mortality in people with type 1 diabetes at high risk of cardiovascular disease . Design: Prospective cohort study. Methods: 195 people with type 1 diabetes from the Secondary Manifestations of ARTerial disease (SMART) cohort were included. Insulin resistance was quantified by the estimated glucose disposal rate (eGDR) with higher eGDR levels indicating higher insulin sensitivity (i.e. lower eGDR levels indicating higher insulin resistance). Linear regression models were used to evaluate determinants associated with eGDR. The effect of eGDR on cardiovascular events, cardiovascular events or vascular interventions (combined endpoint) and on all-cause mortality was analysed using Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for confounders. Results: In 195 individuals (median follow-up 12.9 years, IQR 6.7-17.0), a total of 25 cardiovascular events, 26 vascular interventions and 27 deaths were observed. High eGDR as a marker for preserved insulin sensitivity was independently associated with a lower risk of cardiovascular events (HR 0.75; 95%CI 0.61-0.91), a lower risk of cardiovascular events and vascular interventions (HR 0.74; 95%CI 0.63-0.87), and a lower risk of all-cause mortality (HR 0.81; 95%CI 0.67-0.98). Conclusions: Insulin resistance as measured by eGDR is an additional risk factor for cardiovascular disease in individuals with type 1 diabetes. Modification of insulin resistance by lifestyle interventions or pharmacological treatment could be a viable therapeutic target to lower the risk of cardiovascular disease.


2021 ◽  
Vol 17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michal Kulecki ◽  
Aleksandra Uruska ◽  
Dariusz Naskret ◽  
Dorota Zozulinska-Ziolkiewicz

: The most common cause of mortality among people with type 1 diabetes is cardiovascular diseases. Arterial stiffness allows predicting cardiovascular complications, cardiovascular mortality, and all-cause mortality. There are different ways to measure arterial stiffness; the gold standard is pulse wave velocity. Arterial stiffness is increased in people with type 1 diabetes compared to healthy controls. It increases with age and duration of type 1 diabetes. Arterial stiffness among people with type 1 diabetes has a positive association with systolic blood pressure, obesity, glycated hemoglobin, waist circumference, and waist to hip ratio. It has a negative correlation with estimated glomerular filtration rate, high-density lipoprotein, and the absence of carotid plaques. The increased arterial stiffness could be the result of insulin resistance, collagen increase due to inadequate enzymatic glycation, endothelial and autonomic dysfunction. The insulin-induced decrease in arterial stiffness is impaired in type 1 diabetes. There are not enough proofs to use pharmacotherapy in the prevention of arterial stiffness, but some of the medicaments have obtained promising results in single studies, for example, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors, statins, and SGLT2 inhibitors. The main form of prevention of arterial stiffness progression remains glycemic control and a healthy lifestyle.


2014 ◽  
Vol 99 (3) ◽  
pp. 800-807 ◽  
Author(s):  
Danielle A. J. M. Schoenaker ◽  
Dominique Simon ◽  
Nish Chaturvedi ◽  
John H. Fuller ◽  
Sabita S. Soedamah-Muthu ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document