759-P: Telephonic Coaching Is Associated with Improved Glycemic Control in Many Individuals with Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes

Diabetes ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 69 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 759-P
Author(s):  
WILLIAM C. BIGGS ◽  
ANN BUSKIRK ◽  
LENA BORSA ◽  
MAUREEN R. LYDEN ◽  
CHRISTOPHER PARKIN ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Glycemic Control ◽  
Telephonic Coaching

The Role of Physical Exercise in Obesity and Diabetes

2018 ◽  
Vol 66 (3) ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Type 1 Diabetes ◽  
Glycemic Control ◽  
Physical Exercise ◽  
Treatment Guidelines ◽  
Treatment Guideline ◽  
Obesity And Diabetes ◽  
Regular Physical Exercise

The prevalence of obesity is increasing world-wide. Obesity is associated with a plethora of metabolic and clinical constraints, which result in a higher risk for the development of cardiovascular complications and metabolic disease, particularly insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes. Obesity is an acknowledged determinant of glycemic control in patients with type 1 diabetes and accounts for the majority of premature death due to cardiovascular events. Physical exercise is generally recommended in patients with diabetes in order to prevent the development of or reduce existing obesity, as adopted by every international treatment guideline so far. Regular physical exercise has a beneficial impact on body composition, cardiovascular integrity, insulin sensitivity and quality of life. However, only a minority of patients participates in regular physical exercise, due to individual or ­disease-related barriers. In type 2 diabetes, there is robust evidence for beneficial effects of physical exercise on glycemic control, cardiovascular health and the development of diabetes-related long-term complications. In type 1 diabetes and patients treated with insulin, a higher risk for exercise-­related hypoglycemia has to be considered, which requires certain prerequisites and adequate adaptions of insulin ­dosing. Current treatment guidelines do only incompletely address the development of exercise-related hypoglycemia. However, every patient with diabetes should participate in regular physical exercise in order to support and enable ­sufficient treatment and optimal glycemic control.

scholarly journals Increased stress, weight gain and less exercise in relation to glycemic control in people with type 1 and type 2 diabetes during the COVID-19 pandemic

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. e002035
Author(s):  
Merel M Ruissen ◽  
Hannah Regeer ◽  
Cyril P Landstra ◽  
Marielle Schroijen ◽  
Ingrid Jazet ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Type 1 Diabetes ◽  
Weight Gain ◽  
Glycemic Control ◽  
Perceived Stress ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Design And Methods

IntroductionLockdown measures have a profound effect on many aspects of daily life relevant for diabetes self-management. We assessed whether lockdown measures, in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, differentially affect perceived stress, body weight, exercise and related this to glycemic control in people with type 1 and type 2 diabetes.Research design and methodsWe performed a short-term observational cohort study at the Leiden University Medical Center. People with type 1 and type 2 diabetes ≥18 years were eligible to participate. Participants filled out online questionnaires, sent in blood for hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) analysis and shared data of their flash or continuous glucose sensors. HbA1c during the lockdown was compared with the last known HbA1c before the lockdown.ResultsIn total, 435 people were included (type 1 diabetes n=280, type 2 diabetes n=155). An increase in perceived stress and anxiety, weight gain and less exercise was observed in both groups. There was improvement in glycemic control in the group with the highest HbA1c tertile (type 1 diabetes: −0.39% (−4.3 mmol/mol) (p<0.0001 and type 2 diabetes: −0.62% (−6.8 mmol/mol) (p=0.0036). Perceived stress was associated with difficulty with glycemic control (p<0.0001).ConclusionsAn increase in perceived stress and anxiety, weight gain and less exercise but no deterioration of glycemic control occurs in both people with relatively well-controlled type 1 and type 2 diabetes during short-term lockdown measures. As perceived stress showed to be associated with glycemic control, this provides opportunities for healthcare professionals to put more emphasis on psychological aspects during diabetes care consultations.

CONCENTRATED INSULINS: CLINICAL UPDATE OF THERAPEUTIC OPTIONS

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (Supplement 3) ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Guillermo E. Umpierrez ◽  
Elizabeth H. Holt ◽  
Daniel Einhorn ◽  
Janet B. McGill
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Glycemic Control ◽  
Insulin Therapy ◽  
Insulin Infusion ◽  
Cell Function ◽  
Total Daily Dose ◽  
Β Cell ◽  
Oral Antidiabetic Agents

Improved glycemic control is associated with a reduced risk of diabetic complications. Optimal management of patients with type 2 diabetes includes nutritional therapy, physical activity, and pharmacotherapy for glycemic control. Most patients with type 2 diabetes are initially managed with oral antidiabetic agents, but as β-cell function declines and the disease progresses, insulin therapy is frequently needed to maintain glycemic control. Insulin therapy given with multidose insulin injection regimen or by continuous insulin infusion is needed for patients with type 1 diabetes to achieve control. Obesity and its associated insulin resistance contribute to greater insulin requirements in patients with both type 1 and type 2 diabetes to achieve glycemic control, creating a need for concentrated insulin. Concentrated insulin formulations can be prescribed as an alternative to 100 unit/mL insulin and provide the advantage of low injection volume, leading to less pain and possibly fewer insulin injections. This review includes a stepwise analysis of all currently available concentrated insulin products, analyzes the most up-to-date evidence, and presents this in combination with expert guidance and commentary in an effort to provide clinicians with a thorough overview of the characteristics and benefits of concentrated insulins in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes–instilling confidence when recommending, prescribing, and adjusting these medications. Abbreviations: A1C = glycated hemoglobin; β-cell = pancreatic betacell; BG = blood glucose; CI = confidence interval; CSII = continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion; MDI = multiple daily injections; NHANES = National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey; PD = pharmacodynamic; PK = pharmacokinetic; TDD = total daily dose; U100 = 100 units/mL; U200 = 200 units/mL; U300 = 300 units/mL; U500 = 500 units/mL; USD = United States dollars

scholarly journals Effectiveness of a Regional Prepregnancy Care Program in Women With Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes: Benefits beyond glycemic control

Diabetes Care ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 33 (12) ◽  
pp. 2514-2520 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. R. Murphy ◽  
J. M. Roland ◽  
T. C. Skinner ◽  
D. Simmons ◽  
E. Gurnell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Glycemic Control ◽  
Care Program ◽  
Prepregnancy Care

A Practical Guide to Concentrated Insulin for Pharmacists

2014 ◽  
Vol 27 (5) ◽  
pp. 481-486 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Andres ◽  
Jennifer N. Clements
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Glycemic Control ◽  
Health Care Professionals ◽  
Dietary Habits ◽  
Hepatic Glucose Production ◽  
Management Strategies ◽  
Glucose Production ◽  
Practical Guide

Purpose: Insulin improves glycemic control in several ways, for example, by stimulating glucose uptake in the muscle and inhibiting hepatic glucose production. It has other mechanisms of action for correcting the abnormal metabolism of proteins, fats, and carbohydrates. The formulation of concentrated insulin (U-500) is a higher potency of insulin than the U-100 regular formulation. It is indicated for children and adults with type 1 and type 2 diabetes who have not achieved adequate glycemic control with exercise and proper dietary habits. However, the unique characteristics of concentrated insulin require that a patient be educated on its use. This article provides a practical guide for pharmacists on the use of concentrated insulin in both inpatient and outpatient settings and highlights specific concerns and management strategies. Conclusion: Concentrated insulin works in the same mechanism as U-100 insulin formulations for treating type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Pharmacists are knowledgeable about managing the disease and can identify patients who will benefit with treatment of concentrated insulin. They can provide recommendations to prevent and resolve situations, such as dosing errors, which arise in patients on concentrated insulin and can educate patients and health care professionals on dosing conversions and titration.

scholarly journals Patient Satisfaction and Glycemic Control After 1 Year With Inhaled Insulin (Exubera) in Patients With Type 1 or Type 2 Diabetes

Diabetes Care ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. 1318-1323 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Rosenstock ◽  
J. C. Cappelleri ◽  
B. Bolinder ◽  
R. A. Gerber
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Glycemic Control ◽  
Inhaled Insulin

scholarly journals SAT-676 Pembrolizumab Induced Worsening Glycemic Control and DKA in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarita Goud ◽  
Yu Yu Thar
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Glycemic Control ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Insulin Dependent

Abstract INTRODUCTION Pembrolizumab(Keytruda) is a humanized IgG4 anti-programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) antibody serving as an immune-checkpoint inhibitor, now approved by FDA to treat several types of cancer. Although there are few reported cases of pembrolizumab induced new onset DKA in a non diabetic patients due to its autoimmune nature, its association in worsening glycemic control and DKA in pre-existing type 2 Diabetes mellitus is not well established. CASE 79 years old female with past medical hx of DM type 2 (Hba1c 7.4 was started on metformin), COPD(on chronic steroids and trilogy machine at home), recently diagnosed with poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma of the left lung, metastasis to liver, PDL 1 positive at 99%, started on palliative chemotherapy with Keytruda, 2 weeks after the third cycle of keytruda presented to the ED for AMS. Patient noted to be very dehydrated, somnolescent and tachypnea. Labs consistent with sugars &gt; 600, potassium 6.8, Bicarb 5, Anion gap 33, beta hydroxybutyrate 11.5 (on 7/15/19 0.6), HbA1c 9.7,(On 12/15/16 7.3, 9/25/18 6.7, 1/22/19 7.4). PH 7.31, lactate 2.4. WBC count 21.5- no infectious source identified (CXR, CT brain, UA clean). Patient was admitted for DKA and treated with IV insulin and IV fluids. After medically stable patient was discharged with Insulin regimen. Within 5 days after being discharged, patient presented to ED again with DKA with PH 7.27, Bicarb 8, anion gap 22, sugars&gt;600, beta hydroxybuterate 13.70. Patient was Rx for DKA- after a week of hospitalization was discharged to Hospice(due to metastatic cancer) and few weeks later expired.To summarize, pt with well controlled type 2 DM on metformin presented with frequent DKA 2 weeks after treatment with third cycle of keytruda leading to worsening glycemic control in-turn making patient Insulin dependent. CONCLUSION Incidence of Type 1 DM with pembrolizumab treatment is being increasingly recognized and reported, and DKA is a common initial presentation. However we need further studies to establish the mechanism of worsening glycemic control leading to Insulin dependent and DKA in patients with pre-existing type 2 diabetes. Also, physicians should counsel patients about this potential immune related adverse effect and educate them about the symptoms of hyperglycemia and DKA. REFERENCES Immune checkpoint inhibitors and type 1 diabetes mellitus: a case report and systematic review Jeroen M K de Filette1, Joeri J Pen2, Lore Decoster3, Thomas Vissers4, Bert Bravenboer1, Bart J Van der Auwera5, Frans K Gorus5, Bart O Roep6,7, Sandrine Aspeslagh3, Bart Neyns3, Brigitte Velkeniers1 and Aan V Kharagjitsingh1,2,5,8 Immune checkpoint inhibitors: an emerging cause of insulin-dependent diabetes. Anupam Kotwal1, Candace Haddox2, Matthew Block3, Yogish C Kudva1. BMJ open Diabetes and research, Vol 7, issue1.

scholarly journals Clinical Effectiveness of Different Technologies for Diabetes in Pregnancy: Systematic Literature Review (Preprint)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudia Eberle ◽  
Maxine Loehnert ◽  
Stefanie Stichling
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Type 1 Diabetes ◽  
Glycemic Control ◽  
Clinical Effectiveness ◽  
Neonatal Outcomes ◽  
Diabetes In Pregnancy ◽  
Pregnancy And Birth ◽  
In Pregnancy

BACKGROUND Hyperglycemia in pregnancy occurs worldwide and is closely associated with health issues in women and their offspring, such as pregnancy and birth complications, respectively, as well as comorbidities, such as metabolic and cardiovascular diseases. To optimize the management of diabetic pregnancies, sustainable strategies are urgently needed. Investigation of constantly evolving technologies for diabetes that help to manage pregnancy and health is required. OBJECTIVE We aimed to conduct a systematic review to assess the clinical effectiveness of technologies for diabetes in pregnancy. METHODS Relevant databases including MEDLINE (PubMed), Cochrane Library, Embase, CINAHL, and Web of Science Core Collection were searched in September 2020 for clinical studies (2008-2020). Findings were organized by type of diabetes, type of technology, and outcomes (glycemic control, pregnancy- and birth-related outcomes, and neonatal outcomes). Study quality was assessed using Effective Public Health Practice Project criteria. RESULTS We identified 15 randomized controlled trials, 3 randomized crossover trials, 2 cohort studies, and 2 controlled clinical trials. Overall, 9 studies focused on type 1 diabetes, 0 studies focused on gestational diabetes, and 3 studies focused on both type 1 diabetes and type 2 diabetes. We found that 9 studies were strong quality, 11 were moderate quality, and 2 were weak quality. Technologies for diabetes seemed to have particularly positive effects on glycemic control in all types of diabetes, shown by some strong and moderate quality studies. Positive trends in pregnancy-related, birth-related, and neonatal outcomes were observed. CONCLUSIONS Technologies have the potential to effectively improve the management of diabetes during pregnancy. Further research on the clinical effectiveness of these technologies is needed, especially in pregnant women with type 2 diabetes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document