scholarly journals Lip Morphological Changes in Orthodontic Treatment

2009 ◽  
Vol 79 (2) ◽  
pp. 256-264 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rafiqul Islam ◽  
Toru Kitahara ◽  
Lutfun Naher ◽  
Atsushi Hara ◽  
Akihiko Nakasima
Keyword(s):  
Adult Female ◽  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Morphological Changes ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Upward Movement ◽  
Normal Occlusion ◽  
Division 1 ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Class Ii Division 1

Abstract Objective: To evaluate the morphological changes in the lips and to determine the degree of improvement in the smile after orthodontic treatment for Class II division 1 malocclusion. Materials and Methods: The sample subjects were divided into two groups: a group that consisted of 20 adult female patients with Angle Class II division 1 malocclusion and a control group that consisted of 28 adult female volunteers with normal occlusion. Frontal photographs were taken before and after orthodontic treatment, and 35 landmarks were placed on each tracing made from the photograph. Thereafter, landmarks were digitized into an x- and y-coordinate system with the subnasal point as the origin. The comparisons between pretreatment and posttreatment at rest and on smiling, and the comparisons between Class II division 1 and control group were made using Student's t-test. Results: Both the upper and lower lips in the smile of patients in the Class II division 1 pretreatment group were positioned downward, and the upward movement of the upper lip and mouth corners was smaller in comparison with the control group. These characteristics of the Class II smile improved after orthodontic treatment, but the differences with the control group remained unchanged immediately after treatment. Conclusion: The soft tissue morphology shows a relative improvement after orthodontic treatment.

Perbedaan Analisis Sefalometri Skeletal Sebelum dan Sesudah Perawatan Alat Myofunctional pada Pasien Maloklusi Dentoskeletal Kelas II Divisi I dalam Masa Pertumbuhan dengan Metode Steiner

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nugroho Ahmad Riyadi
Keyword(s):  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
T Test ◽  
Analytic Study ◽  
Statistic Analysis ◽  
Twin Block ◽  
Normal Occlusion ◽  
Division 1 ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Class Ii Division 1

The aim of orthodontics treatment is normalization of teeth position in three planes, using various orthodontics appliance to reach the chepalometric standar and normal occlusion. Orthodontic treatment for dentoskeletal class II division 1 malocclusion in growing patients using myofunctional appliance may correct anteroposterior planes of mandibula. This study was a descriptive retrospective analytic study to look at the success of Orthodontic treatment for dentoskeletal class II division 1 in growing patients with myofunctional appliance using chepalometrics analysis Steiner value. The sample used in this study is chepalogram radiographic from patient with dentoskeletal class II division 1 malocclusion in growing patients before and after using myofunctional appliance in PPDGS orthodontics Clinic of Padjadjaran University. Statistic analysis were performed with pair t-test and Wilcoxon. Based on this study, it is concluded that orthodontic treatment with myofunctional appliance such as activator and twin block in growing patient with dentoskeletal class II division 1 malocclusion shows significant changes and compatibility with the normal criteria.

scholarly journals Evaluation of tongue posture & dimensions in relation to skeletal Class I and Class II patterns- A cephalometric study

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 276-281
Author(s):  
Puja Khanna ◽  
Sumit Chhabra ◽  
Preeti Munjal ◽  
Sunny Mittal ◽  
Nishtha Arora
Keyword(s):  
Statistical Tests ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Class I ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Skeletal Class ◽  
Normal Occlusion ◽  
Division 1 ◽  
Skeletal Pattern ◽  
Bonferroni Test ◽  
Class Ii Division 1

Association of tongue posture with dental and facial skeletal pattern have been suggested in past. This study was undertaken to assess tongue posture and dimensions in Class I and Class II Dentoskeletal patterns to determine whether any correlation exists between tongue posture and skeletal pattern of an individual. Cephalograms of 150 individuals (aged 18-23 years), taken in Natural Head Position (NHP) and tongue at rest were divided into three groups i.e. Group 1 – Class I Normal occlusion, Group 2 – Class II Division 1 Normodivergent and Group 3 – Class II Division 1 Hypodivergent, consisting of 50 samples each. To ensure the rest position of tongue, patient was asked to relax for 30 seconds after coating the tongue with barium sulphate in midline and then to swallow, and the X-ray was taken at the end of swallowing. Each group was divided into two subgroups according to sex. Groups were constituted according to the Frankfort mandibular plane angle (FMA) angle. The subjects who had skeletal Class II pattern due to mandibular retrusion and not due to maxillary prognathism were only included in the study group. Statistical analysis was done using the software SPSS version 21.0. The statistical tests used were unpaired t-test and One-way ANOVA test with post-hoc bonferroni test. The p-value was considered significant if less than 0.05.The dorsum of the tongue was higher at back and lower in front in Class II Division 1 Hypodivergent group as compared to Class I Normal occlusion group (P<.05). Tongue height and tongue length were significantly reduced in Class II Division 1 Normodivergent and Class II Division 1 Hypodivergent malocclusion groups when compared to Class I control group (P<.05).The study supports the existence of a relationship between posture & dimensions of the tongue with Class I and Class II skeletal patterns.

scholarly journals Posisi kondilus setelah perawatan ortodontik pada maloklusi kelas II divisi 1 dengan pencabutan premolarCondylar position after orthodontic treatment in class II division 1 malocclusion with premolar extraction

2021 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 59
Author(s):  
Dhani Ayu Andini ◽  
Maria Purbiati ◽  
Nia Ayu Ismaniati Suria ◽  
Ira Tanti
Keyword(s):  
Temporomandibular Joint ◽  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Joint Space ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Temporomandibular Joint Disorders ◽  
Premolar Extraction ◽  
Division 1 ◽  
Before And After ◽  
The Right ◽  
Class Ii Division 1

Pendahuluan: Maloklusi kelas II divisi 1 dilaporkan seringkali memicu terjadinya gangguan sendi temporomandibula. Posisi kondilus mengalami perubahan pada akhir perawatan ortodontik dengan pencabutan premolar pada maloklusi kelas II divisi 1. Tujuan penelitian menganalisis posisi kondilus pada akhir perawatan ortodontik supaya dapat memberikan pelayanan yang efektif dan komprehensif kepada pasien. Metode: Jenis penelitian deskriptif observasional dengan desain kohort dilakukan pada Klinik Spesialis RSKGM FKG UI dari Maret sampai Mei 2019. Subjek sebanyak 30 orang mengalami maloklusi kelas II divisi 1 yang memiliki gejala gangguan temporomandibular yang memenuhi kriteria inklusi. Metode sampling yang digunakan adalah sampling konsekutif. Foto transkranial dibandingkan dan diukur ruang sendinya bagian anterior, posterior dan superior dan dianalisis menggunakan uji Mc Nemar. Hasil: Sebelum dan sesudah perawatan ortodontik, posisi kondilus kanan dan kiri tidak mengalami perubahan yang signifikan (p>0,05). Sebelum dan sesudah perawatan ortodontik, AJS (Anterior Joint Space), PJS (Posterior Joint Space), SS (Superior Space) kanan dan kiri tidak mengalami perubahan yang signifikan (p>0,05). Gejala gangguan sendi temporomandibula pada akhir perawatan ortodontik adalah kliking dan krepitasi dilaporkan masih ada sedangkan gejala tidak nyaman dan keterbatasan membuka mulut dilaporkan sudah hilang.  Simpulan: Tidak terdapat perbedaan posisi kondilus kanan dan kiri, sebelum dan sesudah perawatan ortodontik dengan pencabutan premolar pada maloklusi kelas II divisi 1. Keluhan gangguan sendi temporomandibular tidak ditemukan lagi pada akhir perawatan ortodontik.Kata kunci: Posisi kondilus, perawatan ortodontik, maloklusi kelas II divisi 1, pencabutan premolar. ABSTRACTIntroduction: Class II division 1 malocclusion is reported to trigger temporomandibular joint disorders often. The position of the condyles changed at the end of orthodontic treatment with premolar removal in class II division 1 malocclusion. This study aimed to analyse the position of the condyles at the end of orthodontic treatment to provide effective and comprehensive services to patients. Methods: This type of descriptive observational study with a cohort design was conducted at the Specialist Clinic of University of Indonesia Dental Hospital from March to May 2019. Thirty subjects experienced class II division 1 malocclusion who had temporomandibular disorders that met the inclusion criteria. The sampling method used was consecutive sampling. Transcranial radiographs were compared, and anterior, posterior and superior joint spaces were measured and analysed using the McNemar test. Results: Before and after orthodontic treatment, the position of the right and left condyles did not change significantly (p>0.05). Before and after orthodontic treatment, AJS (Anterior Joint Space), PJS (Posterior Joint Space), SS (Superior Space) right and left did not change significantly (p>0.05). Symptoms of temporomandibular joint disorder at the end of orthodontic treatment were clicking, and crepitus was reported to be present, while the symptoms of discomfort and limited opening of the mouth were reported to have disappeared. Conclusion: There is no difference in the position of the right and left condyles before and after orthodontic treatment with premolar extraction in class II division 1 malocclusion. Complaints of temporomandibular joint disorders were not found again at the end of orthodontic treatment. Keywords: Condyle position, orthodontic treatment, class II division 1 malocclusion, premolar extraction.

scholarly journals Comparative Evaluation of Esthetic and Structural Aspects in Class II Functional Therapy. A Case-Control Retrospective Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (13) ◽  
pp. 6978
Author(s):  
Gabriella Galluccio ◽  
Rosanna Guarnieri ◽  
Diana Jamshir ◽  
Alessandra Impellizzeri ◽  
Gaetano Ierardo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Class Ii ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Functional Therapy ◽  
Skeletal Changes ◽  
Facial Esthetics ◽  
Division 1 ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Mandibular Retrognathia ◽  
Structural Aspects ◽  
Class Ii Division 1

To compare the skeletal, dental, and esthetic changes produced by three functional devices, Fränkel-2 appliance (FR-2), Twin Block (TB), and Occlus-o-Guide® (O-o-G®), for the treatment of Class II malocclusion. Methods: Sixty-five patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion were divided into three groups and were analyzed through cephalometric analysis of skeletal, dental, and esthetic variables before and after treatment. The first group of 23 patients (F: 9; M: 14; mean age: 10.3 ± 1.08 years) was treated with FR-2, the second group of 18 patients (F: 8; M: 10; mean age 10.7 ± 1.05 years) was treated with TB, the third group (F: 11; M: 13; mean age: 9.05 ± 0.39 years) of 24 patients was treated with O-o-G®. The structural effects of the three devices were compared with a control group generated by the growth variations reported in the cephalometric atlas of Bhatia and Leighton. Esthetic analysis was performed comparing the results of the patients treated with a control group of 20 subjects with mandibular retrognathia and Class II Division 1 malocclusion, not subjected to therapy. Results: The three devices resulted in a significant increase in mandibular length, with higher results obtained for FR-2 and TB. A statistically significant increase in the IMPA angle was found for the O-o-G® group, and a notable reduction of both overjet and overbite was detected in all three groups of treated patients. The esthetic evaluation showed overall more significant results in the TB group, especially with regard to the reduction of facial convexity. The retrusion of the upper lip was on average more significant in the O-o-G® group, followed by that in the TB. Conclusion: All three devices have proven to be effective overall in resolving skeletal changes and improving facial esthetics.

scholarly journals A Study to determine the Prevalence of Malocclusion and Chief Motivational Factor for Desire of Orthodontic Treatment in Jaipur City, India

2015 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 87-92
Author(s):  
Kuldeep Sharma ◽  
Ruchi Sharma ◽  
Dhruv Yadav ◽  
Abhilasha Choudhary ◽  
Swapnil Singh
Keyword(s):  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Class I ◽  
Motivational Factor ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Normal Occlusion ◽  
Division 1 ◽  
Division 2 ◽  
Jaipur City ◽  
Class Ii Division 1

ABSTRACT Background Prevalence of malocclusion varies in different parts of a diverse country like India. Aims To determine the prevalence of malocclusion in population of Jaipur city, Rajasthan, India, as well as subjects views regarding the most important factor for seeking orthodontic treatment by patients who have malocclusion. Materials and methods The sample consisted of 700 subjects (373 males and 327 females) with age group of 15 to 30 years. Subjects were randomly selected and none of them had received orthodontic treatment previously. The subjects who showed bilateral Angle's class I molar relationship with acceptable overjet, overbite and well-aligned arches or minimal crowding were considered to have normal occlusion. The subjects with malocclusion were classified into four groups according to Angle's classification, i.e. class I, class II division 1, class II division 2 and class III malocclusions. Results About 74.57% of population was found to have malocclusion. Among these subjects, 52.57% subjects were diagnosed with class I malocclusion, 12.57% with class II division 1 malocclusion, 8% with class II division 2 and remaining 1.42% had class III malocclusion. No statistically significant differences were found between male and female subjects. Conclusion Among class I malocclusion characteristics, Angle's class I type 1 malocclusion was statistically significantly found to be the most prevalent type of malocclusion. As far as the most important factor for seeking orthodontic treatment was determined, a desire of enhancing facial appearance followed by a desire of attaining straight teeth was considered to be the chief motivational factor among this population. How to cite this article Sharma R, Sharma K, Yadav D, Choudhary A, Singh S. A Study to determine the Prevalence of Malocclusion and Chief Motivational Factor for Desire of Orthodontic Treatment in Jaipur City, India. World J Dent 2015; 6(2):87-92.

scholarly journals Lip Morphological Changes and Differences before and after Orthodontic Treatment

2013 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-12
Author(s):  
MR Islam ◽  
T Kitahara ◽  
L Naher ◽  
A Nakasima ◽  
I Takahashi
Keyword(s):  
Adult Female ◽  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Morphological Changes ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Class Iii Malocclusion ◽  
Skeletal Class ◽  
Female Patients ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Before And After

Objectives: The objective of this study is to test the hypothesis that there is a difference in the morphology of the lips of Class II div 1 and Class III malocclusion, before and after orthodontic treatment. Methods: The sample subjects included 20 adult female patients with Angle Class II div 1 malocclusion and 30 adult female patients with dento-skeletal Class III malocclusion. Frontal photographs were taken both before and after orthodontic and/or orthognathic treatment. Thirty-five landmarks were placed on each tracing made from the photograph. Thereafter, landmarks were digitized into an x and y coordinates system with the subnasal point as the origin. The Class II pretreatment and posttreatment groups of rest and smile conditions were compared with the Class III group respectively, using t-tests. Results: In the Class II pretreatment group, upper and lower lips positioned downward than that in the Class III group. When smiling, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups before treatment, whereas after orthodontic treatment both Class II and Class III groups showed the significant difference at rest and on smiling conditions. On smiling condition Class III group showed more upwards and lateral movement of the mouth corners than Class II group. Conclusion: Orthodontic treatment induced larger amount in movement of lips at smiling in both Class II and III patients, which may reflect the emotional changes in the patients after treatment. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/bjodfo.v1i1.15971 Ban J Orthod & Dentofac Orthop, October 2010; Vol-1, No.1, 5-12

scholarly journals Influence of fixed appliances on two-phase orthopedic-orthodontic treatment

2018 ◽  
Vol 17 ◽  
pp. e18922
Author(s):  
Leniana Santos Neves ◽  
Luiz Filiphe Gonçalves Canuto ◽  
Rodrigo Hermont Cançado ◽  
Guilherme Janson ◽  
Alexandre Fortes Drummond ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Growth Restriction ◽  
Maxillary Incisor ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Division 1 ◽  
Fixed Appliances ◽  
Class Ii Division 1

Aim: The purpose of this retrospective study was to investigate the effects of phase 2 with fixed appliances, after phase 1 Bionator treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusion, as compared to a matching control group. Methods: The experimental group consisted of 20 patients who were evaluated after orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances subsequently to functional therapy with the Bionator in phase 1.  A control group consisting of 20 Class II, division 1 individuals. Results: During phase 1 there was significant forward growth restriction in the maxillary complex, improvement of the maxillomandibular relationship and decrease in facial convexity.  There was also significant reduction of the maxillary incisor proclination and protrusion, protrusion of the mandibular incisors, and vertical development of the mandibular molars.  The overjet was significantly reduced and the molar relationship was significantly improved.  Treatment during phase 2, with fixed appliances, resulted in significant maxillary forward growth restriction and facial convexity reduction. Conclusion:  Major Class II skeletal and dentoalveolar anteroposterior correction was obtained during phase 1, with the Bionator.  Phase 2, with fixed appliances only produced a significant maxillary forward growth restriction and facial convexity reduction, without any significant dentoalveolar change.

scholarly journals Mandibular Asymmetry in Different Occlusion Patterns

2007 ◽  
Vol 77 (5) ◽  
pp. 803-807 ◽  
Author(s):  
Omer Said Sezgin ◽  
Peruze Celenk ◽  
Selim Arici
Keyword(s):  
Class Ii ◽  
Asymmetry Index ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Mandibular Asymmetry ◽  
Normal Occlusion ◽  
Division 1 ◽  
Index Value ◽  
Age Range ◽  
Division 2

Abstract Objective: To investigate the effects of different occlusion types on the mandibular asymmetry in young individuals. Materials and Methods: Mandibular asymmetry measurements were performed on the panoramic radiographs of 189 subjects (104 females and 85 males; age range, 11–15 years), with different occlusion patterns. The subjects were divided into five groups according to the occlusion types, namely, Angle Class I (Cl I), Class II division 1 (Cl II/1), Class II division 2 (Cl II/2), Class III (Cl III), and normal occlusions. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to determine the possible statistically significant differences between the groups for condyle, ramus, and condyle-plus-ramus asymmetry index measurements. Identified differences between groups were further analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U-test at the 95% confidence interval (P < .05). Results: There were no statistically significant differences between male and female subjects. The Kruskal-Wallis test showed that the occlusion type had a significant effect on the condylar asymmetry. In Cl II/1 cases, condylar asymmetry values were significantly different from the values of Cl II/2 and Cl III malocclusion and normal occlusion types. The normal occlusion control group was significantly different from those of Cl II/1 and the Cl I malocclusion groups. Conclusion: Cl II/1 malocclusion has a significant effect on the condylar asymmetry index when compared to Cl II/2 and Cl III malocclusion and normal occlusion types. However, the mean condylar asymmetry index value in Cl II/1 malocclusion was not different from Cl I malocclusion.

scholarly journals Class II Division 1 malocclusion treatment using TADs: Case report

2020 ◽  
Vol 67 (3) ◽  
pp. 159-164
Author(s):  
Tina Pajevic ◽  
Jovana Juloski ◽  
Marija Zivkovic
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Dental Arch ◽  
Class Ii Malocclusion ◽  
Posterior Teeth ◽  
Temporary Anchorage Devices ◽  
Division 1 ◽  
Incisor Retraction ◽  
Class Ii Division 1

Introduction. Orthodontic treatment of Class II Division 1 (II/1) malocclusions in adults can be challenging since skeletal effects are limited. Possible treatment options are orthodontic camouflage or orthognatic surgery, in severe cases. The aim of this paper was to present a successful management of Class II malocclusion in an adult patient using temporary anchorage devices (TADs). Case report. After detailed clinical examination, study models and cephalometric analysis, a 26 years old patient was diagnosed with Class II malocclusion, an overjet of 12 mm, congenitally missing tooth 41 and midline shifted to the right in upper dental arch. In prior orthodontic treatment, patient had upper premolars extracted. Posterior teeth in upper left quadrant were shifted mesially. The camouflage treatment was considered, using temporary anchorage devices (TADs) to distalize posterior teeth on the left side, and gain space for incisor retraction and midline correction in upper dental arch. Results. Using TADs as additional anchorage in anterior region and coil spring for molar distalization, the space was made for tooth 23, midline correction and incisor retraction. After 40 months, a satisfactory result was achieved, overjet and midline correction, class I canines occlusion and class II molar occlusion. Conclusion. Class II/1 malocclusion in adults can be successfully treated using TADs. The success depends on the severity of malocclusion and patient cooperation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document