scholarly journals Class II Division 1 malocclusion treatment using TADs: Case report

2020 ◽  
Vol 67 (3) ◽  
pp. 159-164
Author(s):  
Tina Pajevic ◽  
Jovana Juloski ◽  
Marija Zivkovic
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Dental Arch ◽  
Class Ii Malocclusion ◽  
Posterior Teeth ◽  
Temporary Anchorage Devices ◽  
Division 1 ◽  
Incisor Retraction ◽  
Class Ii Division 1

Introduction. Orthodontic treatment of Class II Division 1 (II/1) malocclusions in adults can be challenging since skeletal effects are limited. Possible treatment options are orthodontic camouflage or orthognatic surgery, in severe cases. The aim of this paper was to present a successful management of Class II malocclusion in an adult patient using temporary anchorage devices (TADs). Case report. After detailed clinical examination, study models and cephalometric analysis, a 26 years old patient was diagnosed with Class II malocclusion, an overjet of 12 mm, congenitally missing tooth 41 and midline shifted to the right in upper dental arch. In prior orthodontic treatment, patient had upper premolars extracted. Posterior teeth in upper left quadrant were shifted mesially. The camouflage treatment was considered, using temporary anchorage devices (TADs) to distalize posterior teeth on the left side, and gain space for incisor retraction and midline correction in upper dental arch. Results. Using TADs as additional anchorage in anterior region and coil spring for molar distalization, the space was made for tooth 23, midline correction and incisor retraction. After 40 months, a satisfactory result was achieved, overjet and midline correction, class I canines occlusion and class II molar occlusion. Conclusion. Class II/1 malocclusion in adults can be successfully treated using TADs. The success depends on the severity of malocclusion and patient cooperation.

scholarly journals Comparison of intercanine width in between Angle class II division 1 and division 2 malocclusions

2016 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bebby Putri ◽  
Isnaniyah Malik ◽  
N R Yuliawati Zenab
Keyword(s):  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Dental Arch ◽  
Arch Width ◽  
Angle Class Ii ◽  
Angle Class ◽  
Division 1 ◽  
Dental Arch Width ◽  
Division 2 ◽  
Class Ii Division 1

Introduction: Dental arch width measurement is needed to determine diagnoses and orthodontic treatment planning of Angle Class II Division 1 and Class II Division 2  malocclusions that have narrow maxillary dental arch generally. Dental arch width in this study was measured by maxillary and mandibular intercanine width.  This study aimed to compare the differences of intercanine width between Angle Class II division 1 and Class II division 2 malocclusions. Methods: Descriptive comparative research with total samples of 67 study models, consisted of 34 Class II division 1 cases and 33 Class II division 2 cases. The minimum age of the samples chosen was 13 years old with no history of orthodontic treatment. A non probability consecutive sampling technique was used. Results: Study results showed the avarage maxillary and mandibular intercanine width of Class II Division 1 were 33,99 mm and 26,33 mm. Average maxillary and mandibular intercanine width of Class II Division 2 were 34,77 mm and 25,37 mm. Conclusions: T-test analysis showed no statistical significant differences in the intercanine width between Angle Class II Division 1 and Class II Division 2  malocclusions.

Lingual orthodontics with customized functional appliance

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 151-156
Author(s):  
Sridhar Premkumar ◽  
Varun Peter
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Synergistic Effect ◽  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Treatment Technique ◽  
Functional Appliance ◽  
Lingual Orthodontics ◽  
Effective Manner ◽  
Division 1 ◽  
Class Ii Division 1

Every treatment technique in the orthodontic specialty has its own set of advantages. Combining the techniques in an effective manner could result in a synergistic effect. Two such techniques are lingual orthodontics and functional orthopaedic appliances. This case report shows the effective and efficient use of a customized functional appliance, along with lingual orthodontics, in the management of Class II division 1 malocclusion. It emphasizes the importance of combining the benefits of different strategies of orthodontic treatment. CPD/Clinical Relevance: The use of a customized functional appliance along with lingual orthodontics can produce desirable changes in Class II division 1 cases and clinicians should be aware of these advantages.

scholarly journals A Comparative Study of Arch Widths of Bangladeshi Subject with Normal Occlusion and Class II Division 1 Malocclusion

2013 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 18-23
Author(s):  
MM Islam ◽  
MZ Hossain
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Class I ◽  
Dental Arch ◽  
Class Ii Malocclusion ◽  
Normal Occlusion ◽  
Division 1 ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Dental Crowding ◽  
Class Ii Division 1

Aim: To evaluate possible differences of the upper and lower dental arches width among youths with Class I,normal occlusion and Class II, division 1 malocclusion. Materials and Methods: The evaluation was conducted on 100 pairs of dental casts of Bangladeshi youths with permanent dentition, 50 with Class I, normal occlusion (22 males and 28 females) at the mean age of 19±3 years and 50 with Class II, division 1, malocclusion (18 males and 32 females ) at the mean age of 20±4 years. The group with Class II malocclusion was divided into two categories: Class II without dental crowding and Class II with dental crowding. A comparison was made between the intercanine inter first premolar and intermolar widths of both dental arches. Results: Subjects with Class II, division, 1 malocclusion when compared with Class I normal occlusion presented (a) in the upper dental arch , smaller intermolar, interpremolar and intercanine width. (b) in the lower dental arch , smaller intermolar width. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/bjodfo.v2i2.16159 Ban J Orthod & Dentofac Orthop, April 2012; Vol-2, No.2, 18-23

scholarly journals Dentofacial changes after treatment with prefabricated functional appliance T4CII

2013 ◽  
Vol 60 (2) ◽  
pp. 93-98
Author(s):  
Ema Aleksic ◽  
Maja Lalic ◽  
Jasmina Milic ◽  
Mihajlo Gajic ◽  
Zdenka Stojanovic
Keyword(s):  
Female Patient ◽  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Dental Arch ◽  
Functional Appliance ◽  
Orthodontic Appliance ◽  
Deep Bite ◽  
Fixed Appliance ◽  
Division 1 ◽  
Class Ii Division 1

Introduction. Functional maxillary orthodontics has a large number of different mobile devices with different effects on craniomandibular system and great capabilities in solving many orthodontic problems. The aim of this article was to show the effects of 9-month treatment of malocclusion class II, division 1 in a 14-year-old female patient using pre-fabricated functional appliance Trainer T4CII. Case Outline. Skeletal distal relation, deep bite, increased overjet, narrowness and irregular position of upper and lower frontal teeth are indicated for orthodontic treatment with fixed appliance. After refusal of fixed appliance therapy, a female patient was proposed treatment with mobile orthodontic appliance. A pre-fabricated functional appliance Trainer T4CII was delivered to the patient. She was motivated and she was wearing appliance at night and 2-3 hours during the day. After 9 months of treatment there was a significant improvement in the position of upper and lower frontal teeth and reshaping of upper and lower dental arch, yet overbite and overjet were corrected. Conclusion. Surprisingly good and fast improvement of all problems within class II, division 1 in a 14-year-old patient was achieved with prefabricated functional appliance Trainer T4CII.

scholarly journals A case report palatal implant for molar distalization

2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (6) ◽  
pp. 847
Author(s):  
Guilherme Thiesen ◽  
Fabiana Mendes ◽  
Marcus Vinícius Neiva Nunes Do Rego ◽  
Amanda Frizzo Viecilli ◽  
Maria Perpétua Mota Freitas
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Oral Appliances ◽  
Molar Distalization ◽  
Osseointegrated Implants ◽  
Palatal Implant ◽  
Division 1 ◽  
Maximum Anchorage ◽  
Class Ii Division 1

Implants obtained popularity in Orthodontics by to make easy the maximum anchorage with the minimal patient׳s compliance. In this context, osseointegrated implants has been frequently used as auxiliaries of orthodontic treatments, substituting in some cases inter maxillaries elastics and extra oral appliances. These implants show as advantage a independence in opposite the patient׳s compliance, the anchorage possibility in periodontal loss cases, over there an esthetic improvement and the comfort propitiated, showing more expected results. This article approach the orthodontic treatment of a clinic case of Class II, division 1 malocclusion, non-extraction accomplished and with palatal implant to distalization of latter teeth.

scholarly journals Orthodontic treatment of Skeletal Class II Division 1 Malocclusion: A case report

2013 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 24-28
Author(s):  
MW Ali ◽  
MZ Hossain ◽  
M Zaki
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Skeletal Class ◽  
Dental Research ◽  
Skeletal Class Ii ◽  
Division 1 ◽  
Class Ii Division 1

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/bjdre.v2i1.15575 Bangladesh Journal of Dental Research & Education Vol.2(1) 2012: 24-28

Perbedaan Analisis Sefalometri Skeletal Sebelum dan Sesudah Perawatan Alat Myofunctional pada Pasien Maloklusi Dentoskeletal Kelas II Divisi I dalam Masa Pertumbuhan dengan Metode Steiner

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nugroho Ahmad Riyadi
Keyword(s):  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
T Test ◽  
Analytic Study ◽  
Statistic Analysis ◽  
Twin Block ◽  
Normal Occlusion ◽  
Division 1 ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Class Ii Division 1

The aim of orthodontics treatment is normalization of teeth position in three planes, using various orthodontics appliance to reach the chepalometric standar and normal occlusion. Orthodontic treatment for dentoskeletal class II division 1 malocclusion in growing patients using myofunctional appliance may correct anteroposterior planes of mandibula. This study was a descriptive retrospective analytic study to look at the success of Orthodontic treatment for dentoskeletal class II division 1 in growing patients with myofunctional appliance using chepalometrics analysis Steiner value. The sample used in this study is chepalogram radiographic from patient with dentoskeletal class II division 1 malocclusion in growing patients before and after using myofunctional appliance in PPDGS orthodontics Clinic of Padjadjaran University. Statistic analysis were performed with pair t-test and Wilcoxon. Based on this study, it is concluded that orthodontic treatment with myofunctional appliance such as activator and twin block in growing patient with dentoskeletal class II division 1 malocclusion shows significant changes and compatibility with the normal criteria.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document