The Law of Income Tax: A Treatise Designed for the Use of the Taxpayer and His Advisers

1953 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 156
Author(s):  
F. E. LaBrie ◽  
E. M. Konstam ◽  
J. P. Hannan ◽  
A. Farnsworth
Keyword(s):  
1978 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 67-91 ◽  
Author(s):  
David M. Reaume

This paper reports on an application of the microsimulation method to the estimation of income tax collections for the State of North Carolina. Detailed forecasts of Income distribution make it Possible to model the law in nearly complete detail. The model provides quarterly forecasts of collections disaggregated by withheld taxes, declarations payments, final payments, and refunds.


1949 ◽  
Vol 47 (5) ◽  
pp. 736
Author(s):  
Joyce Stanley ◽  
Richard Kilcullen

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 93 (4) ◽  
pp. 560-560
Author(s):  
J. F. L.

When Minnesota legislators last spring passed health legislation that included a tax on health care providers, many physicians thought the state had gone too far. As the state begins to implement the law, however (physicians will begin paying the tax in 1994), those same physicians are realizing that their troubles may have just begun. The tax is only one part of a larger health reform package that promises to change the way Minnesota physicians practice. Under the law, for example, the state will assign physicians to some patients. The law also requires the state to develop practice parameters and controls on technology... Beginning in 1994, physicians will pay a 2% income tax on their gross revenues. The tax, which will not be levied on Medicare or Medicaid services or on physicians employed by managed care providers, will help pay for health insurance for the state's approximately 400,000 uninsured. Many physicians opposed the legislation because it will cut into their pay... And to achieve its goal of reducing health care costs by 10% a year for five years, the state will develop and implement practice parameters in an attempt to avoid ineffective treatment.


2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 97-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan J. Auerbach

On December 22, 2017, President Donald Trump signed the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA), the most sweeping revision of US tax law since the Tax Reform Act of 1986. The law introduced many significant changes. However, perhaps none was as important as the changes in the treatment of traditional “C” corporations—those corporations subject to a separate corporate income tax. Beginning in 2018, the federal corporate tax rate fell from 35 percent to 21 percent, some investment qualified for immediate deduction as an expense, and multinational corporations faced a substantially modified treatment of their activities. This paper seeks to evaluate the impact of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act to understand its effects on resource allocation and distribution. It compares US corporate tax rates to other countries before the 2017 tax law, and describes ways in which the US corporate sector has evolved that are especially relevant to tax policy. The discussion then turns the main changes of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 for the corporate income tax. A range of estimates suggests that the law is likely to contribute to increased US capital investment and, through that, an increase in US wages. The magnitude of these increases is extremely difficult to predict. Indeed, the public debate about the benefits of the new corporate tax provisions enacted (and the alternatives not adopted) has highlighted the limitations of standard approaches in distributional analysis to assigning corporate tax burdens.


2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Seruni J. Prang ◽  
Sifrid S. Pangemanan ◽  
Harijanto Sabijono

Income tax article 21 is a tax on income which becomes the obligation of taxpayer to pay for it. Income in the form of salary, honorarium, allowances and other payments with any name in connection with the work, services or activities undertaken by the taxpayer of a domestic individual. The law used to regulate the amount of tax rates, the procedure of payment and tax reporting is the law No. 36 of 2008. The purpose of this study is to find out how to analyze the calculation of income tax article 21 fixed employment and accounting application of PT. Bank SulutGo (Persero) Tbk. Cabang Utama. The method of analysis used in this research is descriptive method that is discussing the problem by collecting, deciphering, calculating, comparing and explaining a situasion so that it can be drawn conclusion covering the calculation of pph article 21 and accounting for permanent employees at PT. Bank SulutGo (Persero). Based on the results of the study found that the calculation of income tax article 21 at PT. Bank SulutGo (Persero), is in compliances with the new taxation legislation, namely law no. 36 of 2008 on income tax and the regulation of the director general of tax number PER-16/PJ/2016.Keywords:  accounting, income tax article 21


2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Novlicia Putri Utiarahman ◽  
Jantje J. Tinangon ◽  
Dhullo Afandi

Income tax is of the largest government revenue. Income Tax Law Article 4 Paragraph 2 gives a mandate to the government to impose income tax on certain earnings final. This study aims to determine how the calculation and report income tax  on savings, deposits, giro customer at PT. Bank SulutGo. Descriptive analysis was employed in this study. Data were obtained by field studies. The result shows that the calculation and reports income tax on savings, deposits, giro at PT. Bank SulutGo have compiled with the law of regulation. Leaders of PT. Bank SulutGo should improve the service guality to each customer, so that custumer can increase the amount of savings.Keywords : calculation, reporting, savings, deposits, giro


1954 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 288
Author(s):  
Frank M. Covert ◽  
Francis Eugene LaBrie
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 112-140
Author(s):  
Chairil Anwar Pohan

Since Legislative Assembly approved Law No. 7 of 1983 on Income Tax, as last amended by the Law No. 36 of 2008 (so there are four time changes, namely by the Law No. 7 of 1991, then No. 10 of 1994, furthermore No. 17 of 2000 and the last No. 36 of 2008), but the base of the domestic and overseas shipping company taxation which apply Special Calculation Norm of Net Income (deemed profit) for the national and overseas shipping companies taxpayers with the application of Article 15 of the Income Tax (Final Tax) did not change either in the tax rates and the tax bases, whereas the corporate tax rate (Article 17 paragraph 1) has changed from the Law No. 7 of 1983 with progressive rates levying at the rate of 10% -35% with the last change to a flat rate of 25% in the Law No. 36 of 2008. Similarly, the Tax Base used appear to have been unreasonable to overseas shipping Net Income amounted to 6%. Tax Base which reflects the rate of return the company is used as a base taxation income tax shipping company seems too low, compared with the rate of profit (net profit after tax) obtained by shipping companies at home and abroad. These conditions certainly result in low tax revenue from the shipping sector, and on the other aspects of the fulfillment of tax fairness rules also disrupted due to the shipping company suffered a loss nonetheless pay a final tax (VAT Article 15).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document