Coccidia in Eastern Wild Turkeys of the Southeastern United States

1971 ◽  
Vol 57 (1) ◽  
pp. 189 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annie K. Prestwood ◽  
Forest E. Kellogg ◽  
Gary L. Doster ◽  
S. A. Edgar
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Southeastern United States ◽  
Wild Turkeys

Status of the Genus Cyrnea (Nematoda: Spiruroidea) in Wild Turkeys from the Southeastern United States

1977 ◽  
Vol 63 (2) ◽  
pp. 332 ◽  
Author(s):  
William R. Davidson ◽  
L. Tipton Hon ◽  
Donald J. Forrester
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Southeastern United States ◽  
Wild Turkeys

scholarly journals DISEASES DIAGNOSED IN WILD TURKEYS (MELEAGRIS GALLOPAVO) OF THE SOUTHEASTERN UNITED STATES

1985 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 386-390 ◽  
Author(s):  
William R. Davidson ◽  
Victor F. Nettles ◽  
C. Edward Couvillion ◽  
Elizabeth W. Howerth
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Southeastern United States ◽  
Meleagris Gallopavo ◽  
Wild Turkeys

Does Enhancing Mind Perception Affect Conspiracy Belief?

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorge Noguera
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Southeastern United States ◽  
Social Discourse ◽  
Psychological Processes ◽  
Social Psychological ◽  
Conspiracy Theories ◽  
Mind Perception ◽  
Mixed Anova ◽  
Interaction Term ◽  
The Mind

This study was conducted to determine the effectiveness of a novel mind perception manipulation. Mind perception is currently theorized to be an essential aspect of a number of human social psychological processes. Thus, a successful manipulation would allow for the causal study of those processes. This manipulation was created in an attempt to explore the downstream impact of mind perception on the endorsement of conspiracy theories. Conspiracy theories are steadily becoming more and more prominent in social discourse. Endorsement of conspiracy theories are beginning to show real world ramifications such as a danger to human health (e.g., in the anti-vaccination movement). A sample of college students (valid N = 53) from a large rural institution in the southeastern United States participated for course credit. These participants completed a mind perception pretest, were randomly assigned to either the manipulation in question (in which participants are asked to consider the ‘mind’ of several targets and write their thoughts about them) or the control condition, and then they completed a posttest. The mixed ANOVA revealed that the interaction term between Time and Condition was not significant. Because the manipulation did not work, other analyses were aborted, in accord with the pre-registration. My Discussion focuses on the procedures and potential shortcomings of this manipulation, in an effort to lay the groundwork for a successful one.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document