Poetic License: Authority and Authorship in Medieval and Renaissance Contexts. Jacqueline T. Miller

Speculum ◽  
1989 ◽  
Vol 64 (1) ◽  
pp. 189-191
Author(s):  
A. C. Spearing
1988 ◽  
Vol 53 (2) ◽  
pp. 132
Author(s):  
David Lee Miller ◽  
Jacqueline T. Miller

2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-48
Author(s):  
Terry A. Veling

Abstract This paper is a response to Heather Walton’s 2017 Presidential Address to the International Academy of Practical Theology, “A Theopoetics of Practice – Re-forming in Practical Theology.” It explores a key question raised by Walton: “If we were to construct a way of imagining a theopoetics of practical theology, what would it look like?” The paper critiques systematic and speculative thinking, reflects on Holy Saturday, and offers a poetic reflection on creation and natural love.


Poetics Today ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (4) ◽  
pp. 561-593
Author(s):  
Klas Molde

In a supposedly enlightened and disenchanted age, why has lyric poetry continued to make claims and perform gestures that are now otherwise inadmissible or even unimaginable? Animation, invocation, and unmotivated praise, apparently artificially imposed (dis)order, and spurious gnomic and vatic sayings that pretend to universal or transcendent knowledge are marks of the lyric as a genre. Sketching a theory of poetic license, this article addresses the lyrical entanglement of enchantment and embarrassment. The author argues for a concept of the lyric as a medium for regulating the balance between enchantment and disenchantment in an always imbalanced environment. Engaging other scholars and using examples from modern French and German poetry, the article also ventures a new understanding of lyric modernity. Rather than naming a historical event to be lamented, disenchantment unveils a risk inherent to the lyric whose regulatory function it makes explicit.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document