The Witch-Hunt; or, The Triumph of Morality. By F. G. Bailey. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1994. ix, 221 pp. $39.95 (cloth).

1996 ◽  
Vol 55 (4) ◽  
pp. 1026-1027
Author(s):  
Susan S. Wadley
1996 ◽  
Vol 83 (2) ◽  
pp. 692
Author(s):  
Rodney Carlisle ◽  
Jim Tuck
Keyword(s):  

2014 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
pp. 49-80
Author(s):  
Sean Armstrong

Using mostly English sources of the witch hunt era, this article demonstrates that the “fragmentation of Renaissance occultism” argued by John Henry and others involved redefining the term “superstition.” At the start of the witch hunt era, superstition was the antonym to religion; by the 1620s, when the witch hunt peaked, Francis Bacon was presenting his new philosophy as the antonym to superstition and its twin idolatry. This change in the signification of superstition was causally linked to the devil, who was both master and goal of all superstition and idolatry. Superstition was redefined and the devil was rethought as aspects of the same process, as critics of the witch hunt concluded that it was superstition to believe the devil could affect the natural order. The early stages of this redefinition drew on a concept from early classical natural philosophy that has been labelled “double determination” by G. E. R. Lloyd. Eventually the expanded concept of superstition became the counterfoil to the new philosophy. Employant principalement des sources de la période de la chasse aux sorcières, cet article démontre que la « fragmentation de l’occultisme de la Renaissance », soutenu par John Henry et d’autres, impliquait une redéfinition du terme « superstition ». Au début de la période de la chasse aux sorcières, superstition était antonyme de religion. Dès les années 1620, au summum de la chasse aux sorcières, Francis Bacon présentait sa nouvelle philosophie comme l’antonyme de la superstition et de l’idolâtrie qui lui associée. Ce changement dans la signification de la superstition était lié au diable, qui était à la fois maître et objectif de toute superstition et idolâtrie. La superstition est redéfinie et le diable repensé comme aspects du même processus, les critiques de la chasse aux sorcières ayant conclu qu’il était superstitieux de croire que le diable pouvait influencer l’ordre naturel. Les premières étapes de cette redéfinition s’inspiraient d’un concept de la philosophie naturelle antique intitulée « double determination » par G. E. R. Lloyd. Finalement, le concept élargi de superstition est devenu la souche de la nouvelle philosophie.


BMJ ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 326 (7385) ◽  
pp. 402-402
Author(s):  
R. Wilson
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
H. Rider Haggard
Keyword(s):  

On reaching our hut, I motioned to Infadoos to enter with us. ‘Now, Infadoos,’ I said, ‘we would speak with thee.’ ‘Let my lords say on.’ ‘It seems to us, Infadoos, that Twala, the king, is a cruel man.’ ‘It is so, my lords. Alas!...


order to answer this question, we should obviouslyexamine Weyer's Depraestigiis to see if it contains elements of what is called, perhaps inappropriately, a myth. One of my students researched this and provided me with the results . She demonstrated that Johann Weyer was nowhere presented as one who opposed the theological approach by means of a medical approach. Admittedly, he pointed to certain 'somatic' causes which affected the physical constitution of witches and which predisposed them to be influenced by the peculiar materiality of the devil's 'spirit'. Weyer even spoke of 'melancholia' when he described the specificsomatic constitution of the witches. But in this he did not differ from the philosophers, theologians and physicians of his time. The same can be argued regarding the second element of the myth. Certainly, Weyer pleaded for a humanitarian approach and acted courageously against unnecessary cruelty , as Montaigne and others did. However, does this imply that he was defending an approach which foreshadowed the specific psychiatric practice? I find it impossible to draw this conclusion. Nevertheless, the debate around witch-hunting was of historical significance for modern times because of the changes which it introduced in the Western concept of man. More elements are involved than are usually related in the traditional Weyer myth. The witch-hunt period was also the period during which the disciplines of theology and philosophy started to diverge. The Reformation and the subsequent wars of religion were partly responsible for this development. It was also influenced by the new findings in lruman biology. Around that time, the circulatory system was discovered. One had also become aware of the existence and importance of the nervous system, although its precise way of functioning was not yet fully understood. The theory of physiological humours was being gradually discarded and, along with it, the belief in 'spirits', the very tiny but distinct material elements in the body's centre. The manner in which Descartes, for example, attempted to construct a. theory of the blood's circuiation which did not abandon the belief in these material spirits, demonstrates how difficult was for modern thought to leave the old experience of the body behind. Moreover, religion was linked to this bodily experience. The beliefs that a human being was part of the harmony of creation, that mankind was influenced by the cosmos, that all kinds of spirits existed; the moral consequences derived from these key beliefs and the more particular religious statements such as, for example, transubstantiation as the core of the Eucharist, were shaken by the new conceptions of the human body which focused on 'man as a machine'. It is characteristic of the changes in this period that the Church did not attack Descartes's philosophical system for its sceptical point of departure. At that time, scepticism was an attitude favoured

2013 ◽  
pp. 157-157

2016 ◽  
Vol 60 (2) ◽  
pp. 2-3
Author(s):  
Ameet Parameswaran

Maya Rao’s performance of Walk at Jawaharlal Nehru University Student Union’s protest against the assault on the autonomy of the university created a space of intimate-public community. The JNUSU protest challenged the arrest of the Students’ Union president and the witch-hunt targeting members of the JNU community as “antinationals.”


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document