Bargaining Power and Wage-Employment Contracts in a Unionized Industry

1992 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 583 ◽  
Author(s):  
Denise J. Doiron
1983 ◽  
Vol 98 ◽  
pp. 173 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jerry Green ◽  
Charles M. Kahn

Author(s):  
Janet Sayers

This paper discusses some of the issues that arise from the Employment Contracts Act for women and bargaining. These issues are discussed in the contexts of likely future trends in female labour force participation. The paper addresses the topics under the following general headings: the structural location of women in an increasingly fragmented labour market and the impact of that on women's bargaining power; socialization and perceptions of women's bargaining effectiveness; and the impact of the social policy initiatives of the New Right on women's employment choices.


10.3386/w0675 ◽  
1981 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jerry Green ◽  
Charles Kahn

1970 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gordon Anderson

The Employment ~Contracts Act 1991 radically alters the system of labour law in New Zealand by moving its focus from the collective to the individual level, and the locus from the industry or occupation to the individual employing enterprise. At the same time, the Act significantly shifts the balance of bargaining power further towards employers. The Act also alters the nature of labour law in 2 significant ways: it abandons the system of registered awards enforceable in their own right and instead opts for enforcement through the law of contract, albeit with separate procedures, and it brings all employment contracts within the new regime. This article covers the nature of the changes to the bargaining system and the implications of moving to a labour law reg.ime based entirely on contract.


2015 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 65-72
Author(s):  
Jean Chrysostome Kanamugire

Specific performance is a primary remedy for breach of contract available for the aggrieved party. This order emphasises the performance of contractual obligations. Although the plaintiff can elect to claim specific performance from the defendant, the court has a discretion to grant or decline the order of specific performance. The discretion must be exercised judicially and does not confine on rigid rules. Courts decide each case according to its own facts and circumstances. Plaintiff has a right of election whether to claim specific performance from the defendant or damages for breach of contract. The defendant does not enjoy any choice in this matter. As a general rule, specific performance is not often awarded in the contract of services. However, recent developments have demonstrated that specific performance will usually be granted in employment contracts if there is equality of bargaining power among contracting parties and such order will not produce undue hardship to the defaulting party. Public policy generally favours the utmost freedom of contract and requires that parties should respect or honour their contractual obligations in commercial transactions. Public policy is rooted in the constitution and can sparingly be used to strike down contracts. Specific performance should not continue to be a primary remedy for breach of contract. Contracting parties should be allowed to resile from the contract and use damages as a remedy for breach of contract.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document