Sexual Selection, Body Size and Sex-related Mortality in the Cicada Magicicada cassini

1983 ◽  
Vol 109 (2) ◽  
pp. 324 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Karban
Keyword(s):  
Sexual Selection ◽  
Body Size ◽  
Related Mortality

Size does not matter for male Marbled Salamanders (Ambystoma opacum)

2015 ◽  
Vol 93 (10) ◽  
pp. 735-740
Author(s):  
D.A. Croshaw ◽  
J.H.K. Pechmann
Keyword(s):  
Sexual Selection ◽  
Body Size ◽  
Reproductive Success ◽  
Large Male ◽  
Male Mating ◽  
Ambystoma Opacum ◽  
Positive Assortative Mating ◽  
Important Trait ◽  
Breeding Groups ◽  
Gravid Females

Understanding the phenotypic attributes that contribute to variance in mating and reproductive success is crucial in the study of evolution by sexual selection. In many animals, body size is an important trait because larger individuals enjoy greater fitness due to the ability to secure more mates and produce more offspring. Among males, this outcome is largely mediated by greater success in competition with rival males and (or) advantages in attractiveness to females. Here we tested the hypothesis that large male Marbled Salamanders (Ambystoma opacum (Gravenhorst, 1807)) mate with more females and produce more offspring than small males. In experimental breeding groups, we included males chosen specifically to represent a range of sizes. After gravid females mated and nested freely, we collected egg clutches and genotyped all adults and samples of hatchlings with highly variable microsatellite markers to assign paternity. Size had little effect on male mating and reproductive success. Breeding males were not bigger than nonbreeding males, mates of polyandrous females were not smaller than those of monogamous females, and there was no evidence for positive assortative mating by size. Although body size did not matter for male Marbled Salamanders, we documented considerable fitness variation and discuss alternative traits that could be undergoing sexual selection.

Sexual Selection and Body Size in Male Red-Winged Blackbirds

Evolution ◽  
1979 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 649 ◽  
Author(s):  
William A. Searcy
Keyword(s):  
Sexual Selection ◽  
Body Size

The quantitative genetics of sexual selection in the dung fly Sepsis cynipsea

Behaviour ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 141 (3) ◽  
pp. 327-341 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wolf Blanckenhorn ◽  
Claudia Mühlhäuser
Keyword(s):  
Sexual Selection ◽  
Body Size ◽  
Genetic Correlation ◽  
Quantitative Genetics ◽  
Sexual Conflict ◽  
Good Genes ◽  
Male Body ◽  
Selection Models ◽  
Sexually Selected Traits ◽  
Mating Cost

AbstractIn the common dung or black scavenger fly Sepsis cynipsea (Diptera: Sepsidae) several morphological and behavioural male and female traits interact during mating. Previous studies show that males attempt to mount females without courtship, females use vigorous shaking behaviour in response to male mounting, the duration of shaking is an indicator of both direct and indirect female choice and sexual conflict, and larger males enjoy a mating advantage. We conducted a quantitative genetic paternal half sib study to investigate the genetic underpinnings of these traits, notably body size (the preferred trait) and the associated female preference, and to assess the relative importance of various models generally proposed to account for the evolution of sexually selected traits. Several morphological traits and female shaking duration were heritable, thus meeting a key requirement of all sexual selection models. In contrast, two traits indicative of male persistence in mating were not. Male longevity was also heritable and negatively correlated with his mating effort, suggesting a mating cost. However, the crucial genetic correlation between male body size and female shaking duration, predicted to be negative by both 'good genes' and Fisherian models and positive by the sexual conflict (or chase-away) model, was zero. This could be because of low power, or because of constraints imposed by the genetic correlation structure. Based on our rsults we conclude that discriminating sexual selection models by sole means of quantitative genetics is difficult, if not impossible.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document