Natality, Mortality, and Growth Prospects of the Negro Population of the United States

1953 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 255
Author(s):  
Jacob S. Siegel
Demography ◽  
1964 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 339
Author(s):  
Donald J. Bogue ◽  
Bhaskar D. Misra ◽  
D. P. Dandekar

2014 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 98-117
Author(s):  
Igor Semenenko ◽  
Junwook Yoo

Large acquisitions in the United States by Canadian firms lower growth prospects and profitability of Canadian companies. Results are driven by post-acquisition performance of the largest Canadian industries, including oil & gas, mining and precious metals, which together account for almost 40 percent of Canadian firms with asset size above 100 million reported in Compustat research files. Cross-border acquisitions of firms in high tech industries do not improve performance of Canadian firms.


Author(s):  
Michael Beckley

Abstract Many scholars predict that China will soon challenge the United States for global primacy. This prediction is largely based on power transition theory, which assumes that rising challengers inevitably “converge” economically and militarily with reigning hegemons. Economists, however, have shown that convergence is a conditional process: sometimes poor countries grow faster than rich countries, but sometimes they fall further behind. Determining whether a US-China power transition will occur in the years ahead, therefore, requires specifying the drivers of long-term economic growth and assessing each country's growth prospects in light of these factors. This article does exactly that. Drawing on recent research in economics, I show that there are three main growth drivers—geography, institutions, and demography—and that the United States scores highly across these factors whereas China suffers from critical weaknesses. These results suggest that a US-China power transition is unlikely.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document