scholarly journals Uniformization, choice functions and well orders in the class of trees

1996 ◽  
Vol 61 (4) ◽  
pp. 1206-1227 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shmuel Lifsches ◽  
Saharon Shelah

AbstractThe monadic second-order theory of trees allows quantification over elements and over arbitrary subsets. We classify the class of trees with respect to the question: does a tree T have a definable choice function (by a monadic formula with parameters)? A natural dichotomy arises where the trees that fall in the first class don't have a definable choice function and the trees in the second class have even a definable well ordering of their elements. This has a close connection to the uniformization problem.

1998 ◽  
Vol 63 (1) ◽  
pp. 103-127 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shmuel Lifsches ◽  
Saharon Shelah

AbstractThe monadic second-order theory of trees allows quantification over elements and over arbitrary subsets. We classify the class of trees with respect to the question: does a tree T have definable Skolem functions (by a monadic formula with parameters)? This continues [6] where the question was asked only with respect to choice functions. A natural subclass is defined and proved to be the class of trees with definable Skolem functions. Along the way we investigate the spectrum of definable well orderings of well ordered chains.


2010 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Arnaud Carayol ◽  
Christof Löding ◽  
Damian Niwinski ◽  
Igor Walukiewicz

AbstractWe give a new proof showing that it is not possible to define in monadic second-order logic (MSO) a choice function on the infinite binary tree. This result was first obtained by Gurevich and Shelah using set theoretical arguments. Our proof is much simpler and only uses basic tools from automata theory. We show how the result can be used to prove the inherent ambiguity of languages of infinite trees. In a second part we strengthen the result of the non-existence of an MSO-definable well-founded order on the infinite binary tree by showing that every infinite binary tree with a well-founded order has an undecidable MSO-theory.


2021 ◽  
Vol 915 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yan Li ◽  
Yaokun Zheng ◽  
Zhiliang Lin ◽  
Thomas A.A. Adcock ◽  
Ton S. van den Bremer
Keyword(s):  

Abstract


Author(s):  
Alec Sandroni ◽  
Alvaro Sandroni

AbstractArrow (1950) famously showed the impossibility of aggregating individual preference orders into a social preference order (together with basic desiderata). This paper shows that it is possible to aggregate individual choice functions, that satisfy almost any condition weaker than WARP, into a social choice function that satisfy the same condition (and also Arrow’s desiderata).


2006 ◽  
Vol 181 (1) ◽  
pp. 6-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
F.A. Abd El-Salam ◽  
I.A. El-Tohamy ◽  
M.K. Ahmed ◽  
W.A. Rahoma ◽  
M.A. Rassem

2017 ◽  
Vol 65 (4) ◽  
pp. 1021-1039
Author(s):  
Nicolas Bouteca ◽  
Evelien D’heer ◽  
Steven Lannoo

This article puts the second-order theory for regional elections to the test. Not by analysing voting behaviour but with the use of campaign data. The assumption that regional campaigns are overshadowed by national issues was verified by analysing the campaign tweets of Flemish politicians who ran for the regional or national parliament in the simultaneous elections of 2014. No proof was found for a hierarchy of electoral levels but politicians clearly mix up both levels in their tweets when elections coincide. The extent to which candidates mix up governmental levels can be explained by the incumbency past of the candidates, their regionalist ideology, and the political experience of the candidates.


1999 ◽  
Vol 47 (5) ◽  
pp. 643-652 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Beauge ◽  
A. Lemaı̂tre ◽  
S. Jancart

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document