Minimal complementation below uniform upper bounds for the arithmetical degrees

1996 ◽  
Vol 61 (4) ◽  
pp. 1158-1192
Author(s):  
Masahiro Kumabe
Keyword(s):  
Upper Bound ◽  
Upper Bounds ◽  
Arithmetical Function ◽  
Natural Numbers

This paper was inspired by Lerman [15] in which he proved various properties of upper bounds for the arithmetical degrees. We discuss the complementation property of upper bounds for the arithmetical degrees. In Lerman [15], it is proved that uniform upper bounds for the arithmetical degrees are jumps of upper bounds for the arithmetical degrees. So any uniform upper bound for the arithmetical degrees is not a minimal upper bound for the arithmetical degrees. Given a uniform upper bound a for the arithmetical degrees, we prove a minimal complementation theorem for the upper bounds for the arithmetical degrees below a. Namely, given such a and b < a which is an upper bound for the arithmetical degrees, there is a minimal upper bound for the arithmetical degrees c such that b ∪ c = a. This answers a question in Lerman [15]. We prove this theorem by different methods depending on whether a has a function which is not dominated by any arithmetical function. We prove two propositions (see §1), of which the theorem is an immediate consequence.Our notation is almost standard. Let A ⊕ B = {2n∣n ∈ A} ∪ {2n + 1∣n + 1∣n ∈ B} for any sets A and B. Let ω be the set of nonnegative natural numbers.

scholarly journals Some inequalities arising from analytic summability of functions

Filomat ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (10) ◽  
pp. 3223-3230
Author(s):  
Sh. Saadat ◽  
M.H. Hooshmand
Keyword(s):  
Functional Equation ◽  
Holomorphic Function ◽  
Upper Bound ◽  
Bernoulli Polynomials ◽  
Upper Bounds ◽  
Bernoulli Numbers ◽  
Trigonometric Functions ◽  
Natural Numbers ◽  
Sums Of Powers ◽  
The Difference

Analytic summability of functions was introduced by the second author in 2016. He utilized Bernoulli numbers and polynomials for a holomorphic function to construct analytic summability. The analytic summand function f? (if exists) satisfies the difference functional equation f?(z) = f (z) + f?(z-1). Moreover, some upper bounds for f? and several inequalities between f and f? were presented by him. In this paper, by using Alzer?s improved upper bound for Bernoulli numbers, we improve those upper bounds and obtain some inequalities and new upper bounds. As some applications of the topic, we obtain several upper bounds for Bernoulli polynomials, sums of powers of natural numbers, (e.g., 1p+2p+3p+...+rp ? 2p! ?p+1 (e?r-1)) and several inequalities for exponential, hyperbolic and trigonometric functions.

scholarly journals Distribuion of Leading Digits of Numbers II

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-42
Author(s):  
Yukio Ohkubo ◽  
Oto Strauch
Keyword(s):  
Distribution Function ◽  
Real Number ◽  
Prime Number ◽  
Upper Bound ◽  
Upper Bounds ◽  
Natural Numbers ◽  
Increasing Functions

AbstractIn this paper, we study the sequence (f (pn))n≥1,where pn is the nth prime number and f is a function of a class of slowly increasing functions including f (x)=logb xr and f (x)=logb(x log x)r,where b ≥ 2 is an integer and r> 0 is a real number. We give upper bounds of the discrepancy D_{{N_i}}^*\left( {f\left( {{p_n}} \right),g} \right) for a distribution function g and a sub-sequence (Ni)i≥1 of the natural numbers. Especially for f (x)= logb xr, we obtain the effective results for an upper bound of D_{{N_i}}^*\left( {f\left( {{p_n}} \right),g} \right).

Upper bounds on the energy dissipation in turbulent precession

1996 ◽  
Vol 321 ◽  
pp. 335-370 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. R. Kerswell
Keyword(s):  
Experimental Data ◽  
Energy Dissipation ◽  
Viscous Dissipation ◽  
Upper Bound ◽  
Dissipation Rate ◽  
Oblate Spheroid ◽  
Upper Bounds ◽  
Precession Rate ◽  
Long Cylinder

Rigorous upper bounds on the viscous dissipation rate are identified for two commonly studied precessing fluid-filled configurations: an oblate spheroid and a long cylinder. The latter represents an interesting new application of the upper-bounding techniques developed by Howard and Busse. A novel ‘background’ method recently introduced by Doering & Constantin is also used to deduce in both instances an upper bound which is independent of the fluid's viscosity and the forcing precession rate. Experimental data provide some evidence that the observed viscous dissipation rate mirrors this behaviour at sufficiently high precessional forcing. Implications are then discussed for the Earth's precessional response.

scholarly journals The Essential Dimension of Stacks of Parabolic Vector Bundles over Curves

2012 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 455-488 ◽  
Author(s):  
Indranil Biswas ◽  
Ajneet Dhillon ◽  
Nicole Lemire
Keyword(s):  
Lower Bounds ◽  
Upper Bound ◽  
Vector Bundles ◽  
Upper Bounds ◽  
Essential Dimension ◽  
Parabolic Structure ◽  
Moduli Stack

AbstractWe find upper bounds on the essential dimension of the moduli stack of parabolic vector bundles over a curve. When there is no parabolic structure, we improve the known upper bound on the essential dimension of the usual moduli stack. Our calculations also give lower bounds on the essential dimension of the semistable locus inside the moduli stack of vector bundles of rank r and degree d without parabolic structure.

ances and covariances obtained from REML are normally distributed with expectation vector and variance-covariance matrix equal to the fol-low  ing, r  espectiv    ely,   When σˆ > 0.04, let νˆ = δˆ + σˆ + σˆ − 2ωˆ + σˆ − (1 + c (7.6) be an estimate for the (7.3) reference-scaled metric in accordance with FDA Guidance (2001) and using a REML UN model. Then (Patter-son, 2003; Patterson and Jones, 2002b), this estimate is asymptotically normally distributed and unbiased with E[νˆ ] = δ +σ − (1 + c and Var[νˆ ] = 4σ + l + 4l + (1 + c ) (l )+ 2l −2(1+c − 2(1+c +4(1+c −2(1+c . Similarly, for the constant-scaled metric, when σˆ ≤ 0.04, νˆ = δˆ + σˆ + σˆ − 2ωˆ + σˆ − σˆ − 0.04(c ) (7.7) E[νˆ ] = δ +σ − 0.04(c ) Var[νˆ ] = 4σ + l + 4l + 2l − 2l − 4l + 4l − 2l . The required asymptotic upper bound √ of the 90% confidence interval can √ then be calculated as νˆ + 1.645× V̂ ar[νˆ ] or νˆ + 1.645× V̂ ar[νˆ ], where the variances are obtained by ‘plugging in’ the estimated values of the variances and covariances obtained from SAS proc mixed into the formulae for Var[νˆ ] or Var[νˆ ]. The necessary SAS code to do this is given in Appendix B. The output reveals that σˆ = 0.0714 and the upper bound is−0.060 for log(AUC). For log(Cmax), σˆ = 0.1060 and the upper bound is −0.055. As both of these upper bounds are below zero, IBE can be claimed.

2003 ◽  
pp. 367-367
Keyword(s):  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Covariance Matrix ◽  
Upper Bound ◽  
Upper Bounds ◽  
Fda Guidance ◽  
Asymptotic Upper Bound ◽  
Variance Covariance Matrix ◽  
Normally Distributed

Models of arithmetic and upper bounds for arithmetic sets

1994 ◽  
Vol 59 (3) ◽  
pp. 977-983 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alistair H. Lachlan ◽  
Robert I. Soare
Keyword(s):  
Upper Bound ◽  
Upper Bounds ◽  
Models Of Arithmetic

AbstractWe settle a question in the literature about degrees of models of true arithmetic and upper bounds for the arithmetic sets. We prove that there is a model of true arithmetic whose degree is not a uniform upper bound for the arithmetic sets. The proof involves two forcing constructions.

ON THE QUASI-STATIONARY DISTRIBUTION OF SIS MODELS

2016 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 622-639 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gaofeng Da ◽  
Maochao Xu ◽  
Shouhuai Xu
Keyword(s):  
Stationary Distribution ◽  
Upper Bound ◽  
Hazard Rate ◽  
State Of The Art ◽  
Upper Bounds ◽  
Hazard Rate Order ◽  
Reversed Hazard Rate ◽  
Novel Method ◽  
Better Than ◽  
Quasi Stationary Distribution

In this paper, we propose a novel method for constructing upper bounds of the quasi-stationary distribution of SIS processes. Using this method, we obtain an upper bound that is better than the state-of-the-art upper bound. Moreover, we prove that the fixed point map Φ [7] actually preserves the equilibrium reversed hazard rate order under a certain condition. This allows us to further improve the upper bound. Some numerical results are presented to illustrate the results.

scholarly journals Upper bounds for geodesic periods over hyperbolic manifolds

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (01) ◽  
pp. 1850009
Author(s):  
Feng Su
Keyword(s):  
Upper Bound ◽  
Upper Bounds ◽  
Hyperbolic Manifolds ◽  
Maass Forms ◽  
Maass Form ◽  
Ambient Manifold

We prove an upper bound for geodesic periods of Maass forms over hyperbolic manifolds. By definition, such periods are integrals of Maass forms restricted to a special geodesic cycle of the ambient manifold, against a Maass form on the cycle. Under certain restrictions, the bound will be uniform.

Injective Hulls of Semilattices

1970 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 115-118 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Bruns ◽  
H. Lakser
Keyword(s):  
Upper Bound ◽  
Partially Ordered Set ◽  
Binary Operation ◽  
Ordered Set ◽  
Upper Bounds ◽  
Partial Ordering ◽  
Partially Ordered ◽  
Image Position ◽  
Injective Hulls

A (meet-) semilattice is an algebra with one binary operation ∧, which is associative, commutative and idempotent. Throughout this paper we are working in the category of semilattices. All categorical or general algebraic notions are to be understood in this category. In every semilattice S the relationdefines a partial ordering of S. The symbol "∨" denotes least upper bounds under this partial ordering. If it is not clear from the context in which partially ordered set a least upper bound is taken, we add this set as an index to the symbol; for example, ∨AX denotes the least upper bound of X in the partially ordered set A.

Research on Two-Phase Flow Induced Vibration Characteristics of U-Tube Bundles

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiang Nai-bin ◽  
Gao Li-xia ◽  
Huang Xuan ◽  
Zang Feng-gang ◽  
Xiong Fu-rui
Keyword(s):  
Upper Bound ◽  
Single Phase ◽  
Two Phase Flow ◽  
Tube Bundle ◽  
Upper Bounds ◽  
Vibration Response ◽  
Phase Flow ◽  
Single Phase Flow ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
Tube Bundles

In steam generators and other heat exchangers, there are a lot of tube bundles subjected to two-phase cross-flow. The fluctuating pressure on tube bundle caused by turbulence can induce structural vibration. The experimental data from a U-tube bundle of steam generator in air-water flow loop are analyzed in this work. The different upper bounds of buffeting force are used to calculate the turbulence buffeting response of U-tubes, and the calculation results are compared with the experimental results. The upper bounds of buffeting force include one upper bound based on single-phase flow, and two upper bounds based on two-phase flow. It is shown that the upper bound based on single-phase flow seriously underestimated the turbulence excitation, the calculated vibration response is much less than the experimental measurement. On the other hand, the vibration response results calculated with the upper bounds based on two-phase flow are closer to the measured results under most circumstances.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document