Biotic Indices and Stream Ecosystem Processes: Results from an Experimental Study

1996 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 140-151 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Bruce Wallace ◽  
Jack W. Grubaugh ◽  
Matt R. Whiles
2020 ◽  
Vol 45 (5) ◽  
pp. 644-658
Author(s):  
Aurea Luiza Lemes da Silva ◽  
William Padilha Lemes ◽  
Jéssica Andriotti ◽  
Mauricio Mello Petrucio ◽  
Maria João Feio

2020 ◽  
Vol 193 (3) ◽  
pp. 227-237
Author(s):  
John P. Ludlam ◽  
Allison H. Roy

Dams can alter the chemical and physical conditions of downstream environments by increasing stream temperatures, altering nutrient limitation, reducing flow variability, and reducing fine sediment deposition. However, little is known about how fundamental stream ecosystem processes like productivity and respiration respond to dams. Nutrient diffusing substrates were installed in three dam streams and three control streams to evaluate the effect of dams on benthic gross primary productivity (GPP), respiration (R), and chlorophyll α production. Dam streams were an average of 5.6 °C warmer than control streams but GPP, R and chlorophyll α were not different between control and dam streams. Phosphorus enrichment increased heterotrophic R relative to controls (~1.8×) but not autotrophic GPP, R or chlorophyll α. Stream nutrient concentrations and nutrient limitation of heterotrophic R were similar in dam and control streams, suggesting that the dams had limited effects on nutrient transport downstream. Autotrophic GPP, R and chlorophyll α were limited by light and varied within and across streams, potentially masking our ability to detect differences caused solely by dams. Dams may alter stream ecosystem func- tion but consideration of other factors associated with and independent of dams is critical for predicting ecosystem responses to dams.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 7 (11) ◽  
pp. e50687 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan W. Moore ◽  
Stephanie M. Carlson ◽  
Laura A. Twardochleb ◽  
Jason L. Hwan ◽  
Justin M. Fox ◽  
...  

Ecosystems ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. 1058-1071 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. A. Bechtold ◽  
E. J. Rosi ◽  
D. R. Warren ◽  
W. S. Keeton

Author(s):  
Norio Baba ◽  
Norihiko Ichise ◽  
Syunya Watanabe

The tilted beam illumination method is used to improve the resolution comparing with the axial illumination mode. Using this advantage, a restoration method of several tilted beam images covering the full azimuthal range was proposed by Saxton, and experimentally examined. To make this technique more reliable it seems that some practical problems still remain. In this report the restoration was attempted and the problems were considered. In our study, four problems were pointed out for the experiment of the restoration. (1) Accurate beam tilt adjustment to fit the incident beam to the coma-free axis for the symmetrical beam tilting over the full azimuthal range. (2) Accurate measurements of the optical parameters which are necessary to design the restoration filter. Even if the spherical aberration coefficient Cs is known with accuracy and the axial astigmatism is sufficiently compensated, at least the defocus value must be measured. (3) Accurate alignment of the tilt-azimuth series images.


1962 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 387-394 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruce Quarrington ◽  
Jerome Conway ◽  
Nathan Siegel
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document