Bergmann's Constituent Ontology

Nicholas Wolterstorff

doi:10.2307/2214317

Bergmann's Constituent Ontology

Noûs ◽

10.2307/2214317 ◽

1970 ◽

Vol 4 (2) ◽

pp. 109 ◽

Cited By ~ 11

Author(s):

Nicholas Wolterstorff

Keyword(s):

Constituent Ontology

Download Full-text

What Is Constituent Ontology?

Metaphysics: Aristotelian, Scholastic, Analytic ◽

10.1515/9783110322446.43 ◽

2013 ◽

Author(s):

Michael J. Loux

Keyword(s):

Constituent Ontology

Download Full-text

Tropes variations: the topic of particulars beyond Sellars’s myth of the given

Synthese ◽

10.1007/s11229-021-03322-1 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Antonio M. Nunziante

Keyword(s):

Philosophy Of Mind ◽

Point Of View ◽

Classical Form ◽

Constituent Ontology ◽

Myth Of The Given ◽

The Given ◽

Phenomenological Point

AbstractThe aim of this paper is twofold. First, I would like to bring into the light the almost unexplored Sellars’s theory of particulars. Second, I would like to show its surprising degree of compatibility with the thesis supported by some contemporary tropists (Lowe, Gozzano and Orilia (eds), Tropes, Universals and the Philosophy of Mind, Ontos Verlag, 2008; Moltmann, Mind 113:1–41, 2004 and Moltmann, Noûs 47:346–370, 2013). It is difficult to establish whether Sellars possessed an own theory of tropes, developed independently by the classical form it took in Williams 1953, but as a matter of fact the peculiar features of his “complex particulars” model it is very much like Williams’s theory. So much so that to all intents and purposes it represents a tropes variation. One of its strengths is that it is not part of a constituent ontology, since it is essentially developed from a linguistic and phenomenological point of view. It is for these reasons that this theory manages to avoid some of the classic objections to tropes and it shows to be compatible with the argument of Jonathan Lowe’s “proper visibility” as well as with Friederike Moltmann’s exquisitely linguistic interpretation of tropes.

Download Full-text