Popularity, Decentering Ability, and Role-Taking Skills in Learning Disabled and Normal Children

1981 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Cliff Horowitz

Twenty-nine learning disabled and 29 normal children were given impersonal and interpersonal tasks of decentering ability. In addition, 130 children, including 31 learning disabled children, were administered two sociometric tests—a sociogram and a social insight test. The learning disabled children were found to perform less well on the interpersonal decentering task, though no differences were found between them and their normal peers on the impersonal task of decentering ability. The sociometric testing indicated that the learning disabled children were less popular than their normal peers, but no less insightful about how others regarded them. No relationship between decentering ability and popularity was found.

1983 ◽  
Vol 53 (2) ◽  
pp. 539-544 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. P. J. Schmidt ◽  
D. H. Saklofske

This study investigated the diagnostic usefulness of WISC-R Verbal-Performance IQ discrepancies, subtest scatter, and Bannatyne's subtest recategorizations with educationally normal and exceptional groups of children. The subjects for this study were four groups of 74 learning disabled, 24 mentally retarded, 94 gifted, and 85 educationally normal children. No significant differences in discrepancies in Verbal-Performance IQs occurred among the four groups although learning disabled children more often showed Performance > Verbal discrepancies. No differences were found between the samples in the amount of subtest scatter. Group differences were noted in the patterns of scores on Bannatyne's recategorizations.


1978 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 1019-1021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas S. Parish ◽  
Robert L. Ohlsen ◽  
Joycelyn G. Parish

Mainstreaming is a legislative reality, yet there is still a question as to whether non-handicapped students are prepared for it. In the present study 131 grade school students were each asked to select from the Personal Attribute Inventory for Children 15 adjectives which best fit three groups of handicapped children as well as normal children. The groups were described in a hierarchical fashion: “normal children” were rated most favorably, then “physically handicapped children,” “learning disabled children,” and “emotionally disturbed children.”


1980 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 387-403 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mavis Donahue ◽  
Ruth Pearl ◽  
Tanis Bryan

ABSTRACTThis study examined learning disabled children's understanding of conversational rules for initiating the repair of a communicative breakdown. Learning disabled and normal children in grades 1 through 8 played the listener role in a referential communication task requiring them to select referents based on messages varying in informational adequacy. Learning disabled children were less likely to request clarification of inadequate messages and, consequently, made fewer correct referent choices than normal children. Only young learning disabled girls were less able than their normal age-mates to appraise message adequacy. Analyses of response latencies and request type also suggest that the failure to request clarification cannot be attributed solely to linguistic deficits. Results are discussed in terms of the relative contributions of syntactic-semantic ability and social knowledge to conversational competence.


1978 ◽  
Vol 47 (3) ◽  
pp. 869-870 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neil H. Schwartz ◽  
Raymond S. Dean

This study concerned the prediction of group membership of 40 learning disabled and 40 normal children on the basis of preference for laterality of the children and of their parents. A stepwise discriminant analysis showed maternal and paternal lateral preferences could correctly identify approximately 85% of the cases. Orthogonal contrasts showed that, although children themselves did not differ in the degree of laterality, parents of learning disabled children were significantly more bilateral in their preference patterns than normals.


1994 ◽  
Vol 78 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1219-1228 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janet L. Poole ◽  
Colleen M. Schneck

Gestures made on tasks in response to verbal command or to imitation and on tasks involving axial and distal movements were compared for groups of learning-disabled and normal children and adults. The 15 learning-disabled children and 15 adults scored lower than the 15 normal children and 15 adults on all tasks. All groups scored higher on imitation than on verbal command and scored similarly on the axial and distal tasks. The findings from this study suggest that it would be worthwhile to test the hypothesis that dyspraxic behaviors may persist into adulthood.


1978 ◽  
Vol 47 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1291-1297 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen S. Strichart

This investigation established the reliability of the Jordan Left-Right Reversal Test for learning disabled children. Test-retest reliability coefficients ranged from .89 to .92 for a sample of 91 children, 5 through 12 yr., attending private schools for children with learning disabilities. Reversal errors decreased with age for boys and girls, although girls 9 through 12 made significantly fewer errors than did boys in the same age range. Learning disabled children made more errors at all ages than normal children. This test instrument was determined to be a measure of the global tendency to make visual reversal errors and was viewed as an appropriate part of the learning disabilities diagnostic procedure.


1980 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 11-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bernice Y.L. Wong ◽  
Roderick Wong

This study investigated role-taking skills in normal achieving and learning disabled children. The children looked at three cartoon series, in each of which a main character was portrayed as being caught up in a chain of events resulting in respective states of anger or fear or sadness. Additionally, in each of them, a bystander was introduced who witnessed the main character's psychological state without the knowledge of the prior context of the events. Each child told the stories from the viewpoints of the main characters and of the bystanders. Only the bystanders' stories were scored for egocentrism. The extent to which subjects could take a perspective which was unclouded by contextual knowledge known only to themselves was thus measured. The results showed that learning disabled children were much less able to adopt an alternative viewpoint than their normal counterparts. Moreover, within the group of learning disabled children, females were substantially more egocentric than males. The results enhanced understanding of previous findings of social problems in learning disabled children, and underscored the need for training learning disabled children in social skills.


1980 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 71-78 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Lee Swanson

The Continuous Performance Test was administered to normal and learning disabled males (CA 12.5) to test the proposition that learning disabled children manifest an attention deficit related to reading performance. Children were tested on two task lengths (4.45 and 9.30 minutes) and two modalities (auditory and visual) in which dependent measures were correct detections and false responses. As expected, learning disabled children with reading deficiencies made significantly fewer correct detections and more false responses than did normal children. There was no strong evidence to indicate that a visual presentation provided better attention for learning disabled children. Results were interpreted as supporting the notion that learning disabled readers are underattentive to critical stimuli.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document