Micro-Interpretation of a Meta-Analysis: A Reply to Inglis and Lawson
Keyword(s):
Responding to a meta-analysis of 94 studies which fails to support the presence of distinctive Wechsler profiles for LD children, Inglis and Lawson contend that a distinctive LD pattern indeed exists. As evidence they cite their own pattern derived from an unrotated principal-components analysis. Although this approach is statistically sound, it nonetheless offers a limited empirical solution with little explanatory power beyond the finding that LD groups seem to find Verbal subscales more difficult than Performance subscales. Further, the authors' response implies a lack of understanding of the purposes of meta-analysis.
2015 ◽
Vol 4
(2)
◽
pp. 257-271
◽
1997 ◽
Vol 103
(1)
◽
pp. 115
Keyword(s):
1978 ◽
Vol 11
(3)
◽
pp. 162-168
◽
Keyword(s):