A Biotic Index for the Southeastern United States: Derivation and List of Tolerance Values, with Criteria for Assigning Water-Quality Ratings

1993 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 279-290 ◽  
Author(s):  
David R. Lenat
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Water Quality ◽  
Southeastern United States ◽  
Biotic Index ◽  
Quality Ratings

scholarly journals Water quality effects of short-rotation pine management for bioenergy feedstocks in the southeastern United States

2017 ◽  
Vol 400 ◽  
pp. 181-198 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natalie A. Griffiths ◽  
C. Rhett Jackson ◽  
Menberu M. Bitew ◽  
Allison M. Fortner ◽  
Kevin L. Fouts ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Water Quality ◽  
Southeastern United States ◽  
Short Rotation ◽  
Bioenergy Feedstocks

scholarly journals Trends in Water Quality in the Southeastern United States, 1973-2005

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas A. Harned ◽  
Erik L. Staub ◽  
Kelly L. Peak ◽  
Kirsten M. Tighe ◽  
Silvia Terziotti
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Water Quality ◽  
Southeastern United States

Does Enhancing Mind Perception Affect Conspiracy Belief?

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorge Noguera
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Southeastern United States ◽  
Social Discourse ◽  
Psychological Processes ◽  
Social Psychological ◽  
Conspiracy Theories ◽  
Mind Perception ◽  
Mixed Anova ◽  
Interaction Term ◽  
The Mind

This study was conducted to determine the effectiveness of a novel mind perception manipulation. Mind perception is currently theorized to be an essential aspect of a number of human social psychological processes. Thus, a successful manipulation would allow for the causal study of those processes. This manipulation was created in an attempt to explore the downstream impact of mind perception on the endorsement of conspiracy theories. Conspiracy theories are steadily becoming more and more prominent in social discourse. Endorsement of conspiracy theories are beginning to show real world ramifications such as a danger to human health (e.g., in the anti-vaccination movement). A sample of college students (valid N = 53) from a large rural institution in the southeastern United States participated for course credit. These participants completed a mind perception pretest, were randomly assigned to either the manipulation in question (in which participants are asked to consider the ‘mind’ of several targets and write their thoughts about them) or the control condition, and then they completed a posttest. The mixed ANOVA revealed that the interaction term between Time and Condition was not significant. Because the manipulation did not work, other analyses were aborted, in accord with the pre-registration. My Discussion focuses on the procedures and potential shortcomings of this manipulation, in an effort to lay the groundwork for a successful one.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document