Weight Change, Survival Rate and Home Range Change in the Box Turtle, Terrapene carolina

Copeia ◽  
1974 ◽  
Vol 1974 (2) ◽  
pp. 546 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard H. Yahner
Keyword(s):  
Survival Rate ◽  
Home Range ◽  
Weight Change ◽  
Terrapene Carolina ◽  
Range Change ◽  
Box Turtle

scholarly journals A Surfeit of Studies: What Have We Learned from All the Box Turtle (Terrapene carolina and T. ornata) Home Range Studies?

Diversity ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 68 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher W. Habeck ◽  
Miranda P. Figueras ◽  
Jean E. Deo ◽  
Russell L. Burke
Keyword(s):  
Home Range ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Convex Polygons ◽  
Terrapene Carolina ◽  
Kernel Analysis ◽  
Analysis Technique ◽  
Eastern Box Turtle ◽  
Box Turtle ◽  
The Individual ◽  
Harmonic Means

Home range (HR) studies are a particularly common approach to investigations of animal habitat use, resource availability, and response to management manipulation such as relocations. Terrapene carolina (Eastern box turtle) and its sister taxon T. ornata (Ornate box turtle) are especially popular subjects of HR studies because they are relatively easily tracked. Terrapene HR studies have revealed a wide variation in HR sizes within and between populations, due to factors such as differences in ecoregion and analytical approach (e.g., minimum convex polygons, kernel analysis, bivariate normal, multivariate Ornstein–Uhlenbeck stochastic process, harmonic means). We performed a meta-analysis of the available literature, including unpublished work to avoid bias due to under-publication, to explore the causes for variation in HR size. We found 19 studies reporting T. carolina HR sizes and seven studies reporting T. ornata HR sizes; the resulting meta-analysis revealed patterns that are not visible in the individual studies. We found important differences between the species: female T. ornata had smaller HRs than males, whereas the opposite is true for T. carolina, and T. ornata HRs were influenced by ecoregion, while T. carolina HRs were not similarly influenced. Not surprisingly, we found that choice of analysis technique affected HR estimate; analyses using ellipses resulted in larger HR estimates than all the other techniques, while kernels were smaller than minimum convex polygons. Although not indicated by individual studies, our meta-analysis showed that the HRs of relocated T. carolina females were significantly larger than those of non-relocated females. Although the number of individual turtles in studies varied from three to 25, the sample size did not significantly affect HR size.

Effect of Orthene® on an unconfined population of the meadow vole (Microtus pennsylvanicus)

1986 ◽  
Vol 64 (1) ◽  
pp. 243-250 ◽  
Author(s):  
David A. Jett ◽  
James D. Nichols ◽  
James E. Hines
Keyword(s):  
Survival Rate ◽  
Population Size ◽  
Weight Change ◽  
Relative Weight ◽  
Reproductive Activity ◽  
Microtus Pennsylvanicus ◽  
Field Application ◽  
Meadow Vole ◽  
Old Field ◽  
Insecticide Treatment

The possible impact on Microtus pennsylvanicus of ground applications of Orthene® insecticide was investigated in old-field habitats in northern Maryland during 1982 and 1983. The treatment grids in 1982 and 1983 were sprayed at 0.62 and 0.82 kg active ingredient/ha, respectively. A capture–recapture design robust to unequal capture probabilities was utilized to estimate population size, survival, and recruitment. Data on reproductive activity and relative weight change were also collected to investigate the effect of the insecticide treatment. There were no significant differences in population size or recruitment between control and treatment grids which could be directly related to the treatment. Survival rate was significantly lower on the treatment grid than on the control grid after spraying in 1983; however, survival rate was higher on the treatment grid after spraying in 1982. Significantly fewer pregnant adults were found on the treatment grid after spraying in 1982, whereas the proportions of voles lactating or with perforate vaginas or open pubic symphyses were slightly higher or remained unchanged during this period. Relative weight change was not affected by the treatment. Results do not indicate any pattern of inhibitory effects from the insecticide treatment. Field application of Orthene® did not have an adverse effect on this Microtus population.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document