Constitutional Law. Fifth Amendment Takings Clause. California Court of Appeal Finds Nollan's and Dolan's Heightened Scrutiny Inapplicable to Inclusionary Zoning Ordinance. Home Builders Ass'n of Northern California v. City of Napa, 108 Cal. Rptr. 2d 60 (Cal. Ct. App. 2001)

2002 ◽  
Vol 115 (7) ◽  
pp. 2058 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Constitutional Law ◽  
Northern California ◽  
Fifth Amendment ◽  
Inclusionary Zoning ◽  
Takings Clause ◽  
Court Of Appeal

scholarly journals Constitutional Law and Abortion in Saskatchewan: The Freedom of Informed Choice (Abortions) Act

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-88
Author(s):  
Sarah Burningham
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Constitutional Law ◽  
Informed Choice ◽  
Political Decision ◽  
History Of ◽  
Court Of Appeal ◽  
Political Decision Making ◽  
Legislative Assembly

AbstractThis paper reviews the history of Bill 53, the Freedom of Informed Choice (Abortions) Act. A private member’s bill introduced in the Saskatchewan Legislative Assembly in 1985, Bill 53 would have imposed additional consent requirements on women seeking abortions. After concerns about its constitutionality were raised, the Bill was referred to the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal, which found it fell outside provincial jurisdiction. This paper explores the connection between Bill 53 and its more well-known cousins, Morgentaler and Borowski, and examines judicial and political decision-making in the early Charter era.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document