Criminal Procedure. Ninth Circuit Provides Inadequate Due Process Protections for Accused Sex Offenders. Neal v. Shimoda, 131 F.3d 818 (9th Cir. 1997)

1998 ◽  
Vol 111 (8) ◽  
pp. 2438 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Sex Offenders ◽  
Due Process ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Ninth Circuit

Due process implications of law enforcement agencies using Investigative Genetic Genealogy to solve serious crimes

2021 ◽  
pp. 1037969X2110072
Author(s):  
Rhanee Rego ◽  
John Anderson
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Due Process ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Law Enforcement Agencies ◽  
Dna Databases ◽  
Genetic Genealogy ◽  
Legislative Reform ◽  
Critical Questions ◽  
Forensic Practice

Investigative Genetic Genealogy (IGG) has opened up new frontiers in the search for the perpetrators of serious crimes. The pool of data held by consumer DNA databases has enabled law enforcement agencies to undertake database matching to find biological relatives of an unknown perpetrator. This relatively new forensic practice is not, however, without concerns when benchmarked against established norms of investigative practice and criminal procedure. The critical questions emerge: how should IGG be used and in what circumstances? In this article, we contend that the current laws in Australia are not capable of regulating IGG appropriately and legislative reform is required.

Questions on Criminal Law and Incarceration

2019 ◽  
pp. 213-236
Keyword(s):  
Sex Offenders ◽  
Death Penalty ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Forensic Psychiatry ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Diminished Capacity ◽  
Questions And Answers ◽  
Self Test

This chapter presents self-test questions and answers on criminal law and incarceration in forensic psychiatry, and includes criminal procedure, criminal competencies, diminished capacity, insanity, prisoners’ rights, the death penalty, and sex offenders.

scholarly journals Pembuktian Penetapan Tersangka Dalam Persidangan Praperdilan

JURNAL BELO ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 218-227
Author(s):  
Steven Makaruku
Keyword(s):  
Due Process ◽  
Minimum Principle ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
Due Process Of Law

The Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) is very different from Herziene Inlands Reglement (HIR), the Criminal Procedure Code adopts the principle of due process of law, which protects the rights of a suspect. Pretrial is an institution that oversees and can judge whether or not the act of determining the suspect conducted by the investigator is in accordance with the minimum principle of proof and in accordance with Article 183 and Article 184 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Procedure Code.

scholarly journals Role of the Court in Protecting Human Rights in crime-control Model, Accrording to the Criminal Procedure Code of 2015

2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Le Lan Chi
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Due Process ◽  
Crime Control ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
University Of Pennsylvania ◽  
Study Guides

The court exercises the judicial power, thereby plays an important role in protecting human rights. However, such role varies across nations and models of criminal procedure. Vietnam, the country has been following the model of crime control, has its corresponding approach to the role of the court in protecting human rights. Notwithstanding, the current context of improving the rule of law and human rights has posed challenges and raised questions of changing the approach. Keywords The Court, adjudication, human rights, model, due-process, crime-control, the accused References [1] Herbert L. Packer, Two models of the criminal process, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 1964, 1 (http://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/penn_law_review/vol113/iss1/1) [2] Joycelyn M. Pollock, Ethical Dilemmas and Decisions in Criminal Justice, Cengage Learning, Boston, 2015, p.116 [3] https://www.cliffsnotes.com/study-guides/criminal-justice/the-criminal-justice-system/which-model-crime-control-or-due-process [4] Fairchild, E. and Dammer, H. R., Comparative Criminal Justice System, 2nd ed. Belmont, Wadsworth Thomson Learning, 2001, p. 146 [5] Fairchild, E. and Dammer, H. R., Comparative Criminal Justice System, 2nd ed. Belmont, Wadsworth Thomson Learning, 2001, p. 148 [6] Đào Trí Úc, Hệ thống những nguyên tắc cơ bản của tố tụng hình sự Việt Nam theo Bộ luật tố tụng hình sự năm 2015 (in trong sách chuyên khảo “Những nội dung mới trong Bộ luật tố tụng hình sự năm 2015”, Nguyễn Hoà Bình (chủ biên), Nxb. Chính trị quốc gia – Sự thật, Hà Nội, 2016, trang 59.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document