Animal Behavior and Ecological Modeling Dynamic Modeling in Behavioral Ecology Marc Mangel Colin W. Clark

BioScience ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 149-150
Author(s):  
Herman H. Shugart
2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
MARC MANGEL ◽  
COLIN W. CLARK

The Condor ◽  
1991 ◽  
Vol 93 (3) ◽  
pp. 789-790
Author(s):  
David J. Stewart ◽  
Cynthia Annett

Evolution ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 44 (7) ◽  
pp. 1879
Author(s):  
Thomas Caraco ◽  
Jonathan A. Newman ◽  
M. Mangel ◽  
C. W. Clark

2015 ◽  
Vol 77 (6) ◽  
pp. 432-438 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad A. Abu Baker ◽  
Sara E. Emerson ◽  
Joel S. Brown

We present a practical field exercise for ecology and animal behavior classes that can be carried out on campus, using urban wildlife. Students document an animal's feeding behavior to study its interactions with the surrounding environment. In this approach, an animal's feeding behavior is quantified at experimental food patches placed within its habitat. Following a lecture on foraging ecology and an outdoor discussion about the animals on campus, students formulate questions and hypotheses. Simple statistical analyses are used to construct results and draw conclusions.


2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel S Caetano ◽  
Anita Aisenberg

Published discussions on data stewardship often focus on standardized datasets whose reuse patterns are known. Improvements in stewardship of animal behavior data are virtually absent and lag behind other disciplines such as molecular biology and systematics. In this essay, we discuss best practices of three key aspects related to the collection and archival of behavioral data: data supporting published results; data collected from field observations; and the potential of museum specimens as source of data to animal behavior and ecology. To quantify how much data is shared in publications we reviewed selected journals in animal behavior and behavioral ecology. We found that only an extremely small proportion of the articles published in 2013 made even part of their data available. We discuss about the benefits of making data available, review resources available for data archiving and provide practical guidance for ethologists. We discuss and provide examples of the amount of ethological and ecological data that can be recorded during field observations. To investigate the potential of museum specimens as source of data, we surveyed researchers working in areas related to ecology, animal behavior, and systematics. Both ethologists and systematists agreed that natural history information stored in collections would be a valuable source of data. We make recommendations to enhance data collection and stewardship from the point of view of researchers in animal behavior sciences, considering the special characteristics of the discipline and the type of data that is often produced. We suggest that there is a large amount of crucial data about natural history, ecology and behavior that investigators could glean from collections. Although it is difficult to appreciate the relevance of data for future studies at the time of publication, such data may inspire fruitful opportunities that we cannot afford to lose.


Evolution ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 44 (7) ◽  
pp. 1879-1880
Author(s):  
Thomas Caraco ◽  
Jonathan A. Newman

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Crall ◽  
Nick Gravish ◽  
Andrew M Mountcastle ◽  
Stacey A Combes

A fundamental challenge common to studies of animal movement, behavior, and ecology is the collection of high-quality datasets on spatial positions of animals as they change through space and time. Recent innovations in tracking technology have allowed researchers to collect large and highly accurate datasets on animal spatiotemporal position while vastly decreasing the time and cost of collecting such data. One technique that is of particular relevance to the study of behavioral ecology involves tracking visual tags that can be uniquely identified in separate images or movie frames. These tags can be located within images that are visually complex, making them particularly well suited for longitudinal studies of animal behavior and movement in naturalistic environments. While several software packages have been developed that use computer vision to identify visual tags, these software packages are either (a) not optimized for identification of single tags, which is generally of the most interest for biologist, or (b) suffer from licensing issues, and therefore their use in the study of animal behavior has been limited. Here, we present BEEtag, an open-source, image-based tracking system in Matlab that allows for unique identification of individual animals or anatomical markers. The primary advantages of this system are that it (a) independently identifies animals or marked points in each frame of a video, limiting error propagation, (b) performs well in images with complex background, and (c) is low-cost. To validate the use of this tracking system in animal behavior, we mark and track individual bumblebees (Bombus impatiens) and recover individual patterns of space use and activity within the hive. Finally, we discuss the advantages and limitations of this software package and its application to the study of animal movement, behavior, and ecology.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document