Horri, Kenzo. Rice Economy and Land Tenure in West Malaysia: A Comparative Study of Eight Villages and Taylor, Donald C. The Economies of Malaysian Paddy Production and Irrigation

1983 ◽  
Vol 65 (2) ◽  
pp. 461-462
Author(s):  
Randolph Barker
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Land Tenure

Land-Tenure in Mycenaean Greece and the Hittite Empire: Linear B Land-surveys from Pylos and Middle Hittite Land-Donations

2005 ◽  
Vol 48 (4) ◽  
pp. 473-486
Author(s):  
Alexander Uchitel
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Land Tenure ◽  
Etude Comparative ◽  
Étude Comparative ◽  
Systematic Comparison ◽  
New Interpretation ◽  
Land Tenure Systems ◽  
Linear B

AbstractThe article is a comparative study of Mycenaean Greek and Hittite land-tenure systems. It is based upon a systematic comparison of two groups of documents: land-registers (the so-called E-series) from Pylos and Middle Hittite land-donations. The traditional interpretation of both Mycenaean Greek and Hittite documents is challenged and alternative interpretations are offered. Thus, on the Mycenaean side, the construction with the preposition pa-ro is reinterpreted, and on the Hittite side an entirely new interpretation of a Hittite expression pir-sahhanas is offered. Both land-tenure systems are interpreted as two manifestations of compulsory labour service of small landholders attached to large agricultural estates. Cet article est une étude comparative des systèmes de tenue de la terre dans la Grèce mycénienne et l'empire hittite. Elle est fondée sur une comparaison systématique de deux groupes de documents : les registres de la terre (appelés la série E) de Pylos et les donations de terre moyenne hittite. L'interprétation traditionnelle des documents mycénien et hittite est ici remise en question et une nouvelle explication est offerte. Ainsi, du côté mycénien, la construction avec la préposition pa-ro est réinterprétée, et du côté hittite une interprétation entièrement nouvelle de l'expression pir-sahhanas est proposée. Les deux systèmes de tenue de la terre sont interprétés comme deux manifestations d'un service de travail obligatoire dus par des petits propriétaires attachés à des grandes propriétés agricoles.

XV. Land Tenure Systems and Rural Development in India and Indonesia in the Colonial Period: A Comparative Study

Itinerario ◽  
1987 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 265-276
Author(s):  
Djoko Suryo
Keyword(s):  
Rural Development ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Social Structure ◽  
Land Tenure ◽  
Colonial Period ◽  
Land Policy ◽  
Credit System ◽  
Asian Countries ◽  
Production Increase ◽  
General Recognition

In most studies of land policy in Asian nations, there is general recognition that agriculture is troubled by problems of landownership, particularly in the landlord-tenant relationship. Many observers point out that these are the principal issues confronting agriculture and the peasantry in most Asian countries. Looking at India and Indonesia, there are a number of problems with differing characteristics in the both areas, such as reform in land tenure and rural social structure, production increase and improvement in marketing distribution, and the credit system.

scholarly journals Implementation of Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Program of a Municipality in Negros Occidental

1970 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 190
Author(s):  
Kim C. Ramos
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Land Tenure ◽  
Land Reform ◽  
Agrarian Reform ◽  
The Philippines ◽  
National Government ◽  
Government Agencies ◽  
Tenure Status ◽  
Reform Program ◽  
Significant Difference

The implementation of land reform programs has become the point of issue in many parts of Asia, including the Philippines. This descriptive-comparative study determined the extent of implementation of the Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Program (CARP) among the Agrarian Reform Beneficiaries (ARBs) and implementers. Using the researcher-made questionnaire, 189 ARBs who are cultivating the CARP covered lands, and 9 CARP implementers provided data for this study. Aided by descriptive-comparative statistics, findings showed a great extent of implementation. It further revealed a significant difference in the extent of implementation of CARP as assessed by the ARBS and implementers. However, it showed no significant difference when ARBs were grouped according to the size of landholding, land tenure status, and crops planted. Moreover, there are challenges identified in the implementation of CARP that should be addressed by the DAR and other national government agencies involved in the implementation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document