International Labor Standards and Their Possible Enforcement in the United States

1919 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 50
Author(s):  
George W. Wickersham
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
The United States ◽  
Labor Standards ◽  
International Labor Standards ◽  
International Labor

Introduction

2019 ◽  
pp. 1-30
Author(s):  
Gamonal C. Sergio ◽  
César F. Rosado Marzán
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Latin American ◽  
Labor Law ◽  
The United States ◽  
Labor Standards ◽  
Labor Protection ◽  
Freedom Of Association ◽  
International Labor Standards ◽  
International Labor ◽  
American Method

This chapter introduces the book’s main goal: to provide a “principled labor law” method to decide hard cases. It describes principled labor law as a Latin American method embedded in the principles of protection, primacy of reality, nonwaiver, and continuity. It argues that principled labor law can be useful even in the least likely case of labor protection, the United States, and explains how, if useful for the United States, it is likely helpful for other jurisdictions. It describes how principled labor law complements perspectives favoring freedom of association—the so-called labor constitution—but opposes views attempting to eviscerate the idea of protecting weaker parties from contemporary law, or those that envision labor law as merely a regulatory endeavor. It also describes how principled labor law shares similarities with the purposive perspective of Guy Davidov, but also contrasts with that perspective, to the extent principled labor law is mostly concerned, and is, in fact, “rulified” in favor of labor protection. It explains that principled labor law seems particularly needed to evade problems of legal endogeneity. The chapter concludes by arguing that the book provides a countercultural narrative for labor law in the United States that is also consonant with international labor standards and, as such, better brings U.S. labor law into the mainstream. Principled labor law may be less countercultural in other countries, but may also help there to renew jurisdictional commitments in favor of labor protection.

The Red Cap’s Gift: How Tipping Tempers the Rational Power of Money

2015 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
DANIEL LEVINSON WILK
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
The United States ◽  
Labor Standards ◽  
Human Relations ◽  
Fair Labor Standards Act ◽  
History Of ◽  
Rational Power ◽  
Fair Labor

Modern people are obsessed with money, but the practice of tipping a waiter or chambermaid is a counterbalance against money’s tendency to infect human relations. People who tip infect money back, with nonmonetary values. This article provides a general history of tips investing money and monetary exchange with ideals such as status, dignity, waste, care, and play, in certain parts of the United States, c. 1880–1929. It also offers a case study of railroad red caps’ tips in the five years following passage of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938; when tipping declined, it reduced red caps’ ability to invest their work with nonmonetary values.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document