Evidence. Credibility of Witness. Right to Examination of Pre-Trial Statements

1945 ◽  
Vol 45 (3) ◽  
pp. 461
Keyword(s):  
Evidence Credibility

scholarly journals Certainty ranges facilitated explicit and transparent judgments regarding evidence credibility

2018 ◽  
Vol 104 ◽  
pp. 46-51
Author(s):  
Kari A.O. Tikkinen ◽  
Samantha Craigie ◽  
Holger J. Schünemann ◽  
Gordon H. Guyatt
Keyword(s):  
Evidence Credibility

scholarly journals An equine disease diagnosis expert system based on improved reasoning of evidence credibility

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 414-423 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hongyan Gao ◽  
Guimiao Jiang ◽  
Xiang Gao ◽  
Jianhua Xiao ◽  
Hongbin Wang
Keyword(s):  
Expert System ◽  
Disease Diagnosis ◽  
Evidence Credibility

scholarly journals A Robust DS Combination Method Based on Evidence Correction and Conflict Redistribution

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fang Ye ◽  
Jie Chen ◽  
Yuan Tian
Keyword(s):  
Conflict Management ◽  
Information Fusion ◽  
Evidence Theory ◽  
Combination Method ◽  
The Novel ◽  
Degree Function ◽  
The One ◽  
Reliability And Robustness ◽  
Evidence Credibility ◽  
Fusion Approach

To eliminate potential evidence conflicts, an effective and accurate DS combination method is addressed in this paper. DS evidence theory is an outstanding information fusion approach with valid uncertainty treatment. Nevertheless, there are some limitations of the usage of the DS evidence theory. On the one hand, due to the complexity of a combat measurement environment and the inconsistency of sensor capabilities, sensor sources have enormous uncertainty, which would inevitably cause conflicts for evidence combination. On the other hand, DS combination rule realizes the unity property of fusing results with a compulsive normalization, which unavoidably leads to conflicting situations. To solve the possible evidence conflicts in a multisensor fusion system, we raise a robust DS combination method based on evidence correction and conflict redistribution. Firstly, two corrected indexes—the reliability index and consistency index—are separately addressed with the introduction of the Matusita distance function and closeness degree function. After the evidence modification based on two correction indexes, the conflicts caused by unreliable sensor sources are solved. Then, based on the corrected evidences, we put forward a weighted assignment of conflicting mass where the weight index lies on the evidence credibility. As the normalization step is abolished, the conflict redistribution strategy avoids the conflicts caused by straightforward normalization. Through comprehensive conflict management, the proposed DS combination method can not only guarantee the rationality and availability of fusing results, but also enhance the reliability and robustness of a multisensor system. Finally, three combination experiments with different conflicting degrees illustrate the advantage and superiority of the novel combination method for conflict management. Consequently, the innovation of the novel algorithm is verified.

scholarly journals Research on improved evidence theory based on multi-sensor information fusion

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhen Lin ◽  
Jinye Xie
Keyword(s):  
Information Fusion ◽  
Evidence Theory ◽  
Fusion Model ◽  
Conflicting Evidence ◽  
Evidence Source ◽  
Basic Probability ◽  
Sensor Information ◽  
Focal Element ◽  
New Evidence ◽  
Evidence Credibility

AbstractIn view of the lack of effective information fusion model for heterogeneous multi-sensor, an improved Dempster/Shafer (DS) evidence theory algorithm is designed to fuse heterogeneous multi-sensor information. The algorithm first introduces the compatibility coefficient to characterize the compatibility between the evidence, obtains the weight matrix of each proposition, and then redistributes the basic probability distribution of each focal element to obtain a new evidence source. Then the concept of credibility is introduced, and the average support of evidence credibility and evidence focal element is used to improve the synthesis rule, so as to obtain the fusion result. Compared with other algorithms, the proposed algorithm can solve the problems existing in DS evidence theory when dealing with highly conflicting evidence to a certain extent, and the fusion results are more reasonable and the convergence speed is faster.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document