Minimum Wages and the Farm Labor Market

1975 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 480 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. F. Gallasch
1972 ◽  
Vol 54 (3) ◽  
pp. 473-476 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruce Gardner

2015 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 280-302 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yi Che ◽  
Yan Zhang ◽  
Linhui Yu

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to examine key determinants of farm labor market development in rural China. Design/methodology/approach – Probit, Logit, and IV-Probit model are used to provide pertinent empirical analysis. Findings – Analysis of survey data establishes three facts about the farm labor market in rural China: first, households with high farm endowment are more likely to hire farm labor; second, because of the mismatch between farm ability and land size created by egalitarian land reallocation, households with more land reallocations are more likely to participate in farm labor market to adjust such mismatch; third, land rental market and farm labor market seem to be complementary. These results are robust to alternative model specifications, subsamples, alternative dependent variables, and additional controls. Welfare analysis demonstrates that the farm labor market is conducive to agricultural output. Originality/value – The main contribution of this study is to lay out stylized facts in terms of the development of farm labor market using a unique survey data set.


2019 ◽  
Vol 109 ◽  
pp. 176-181
Author(s):  
Conor Lennon ◽  
Jose Fernandez ◽  
Stephan Gohmann ◽  
Keith Teltser

We use a choice experiment to examine public support for minimum wages. We first elicit respondents' moral assessment of two labor market systems: one with a minimum wage and one without. Then, we present four pairs of hypothetical employment outcomes and ask respondents to “vote.” Our estimates suggest that the average respondent requires a 4.65 percentage point reduction in unemployment before they would support a system without a minimum wage. We also find that equity matters; respondents are 11.1 percentage points less likely to support a minimum wage if it disproportionately affects minorities and females.


1982 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 223 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip L. Martin ◽  
John Mamer
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document