Erratum: A Macroeconomic Theory of Workable Competition

1965 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 106
Keyword(s):  
Macroeconomic Theory ◽  
Workable Competition

A Macroeconomic Theory of Workable Competition.

Economica ◽  
1965 ◽  
Vol 32 (126) ◽  
pp. 233 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Williamson ◽  
C. E. Ferguson
Keyword(s):  
Macroeconomic Theory ◽  
Workable Competition

A Macroeconomic Theory of Workable Competition

1965 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 388
Author(s):  
Robert Haveman ◽  
Charles E. Ferguson
Keyword(s):  
Macroeconomic Theory ◽  
Workable Competition

A Macroeconomic Theory of Workable Competition

Econometrica ◽  
1966 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 890
Author(s):  
Arthur Lerner ◽  
C. E. Ferguson
Keyword(s):  
Macroeconomic Theory ◽  
Workable Competition

Great Recession and Macroeconomic Theory: A Useless Crisis?

2019 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 382-406 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giancarlo Bertocco ◽  
Andrea Kalajzić
Keyword(s):  
Great Recession ◽  
Macroeconomic Theory

scholarly journals A macroeconomic theory of banking oligopoly

2021 ◽  
pp. 103864
Author(s):  
Mei Dong ◽  
Stella Huangfu ◽  
Hongfei Sun ◽  
Chenggang Zhou
Keyword(s):  
Macroeconomic Theory

Implications for Regional Science of the “Rebuilding Macroeconomic Theory Project”

2021 ◽  
pp. 016001762098659
Author(s):  
Kieran P. Donaghy
Keyword(s):  
Monetary Policy ◽  
Graduate Students ◽  
Global Financial Crisis ◽  
Financial Frictions ◽  
Regional Science ◽  
Macroeconomic Theory ◽  
Income Groups ◽  
Big Picture ◽  
Theory Project ◽  
The Global Financial Crisis

The inability of macroeconomists to anticipate the Global Financial Crisis or reproduce it in their models has led to an important stock-taking of deficiencies in, and necessary modifications to, theories and models used pervasively by researchers and taught to graduate students. This stock-taking—the so-called “Rebuilding Macroeconomic Theory Project,” organized by David Vines and Samuel Wills—has provided an opportunity for economy-wide modelers (who include regional scientists) to consider whether the theories and models they employ are adequate and appropriate to the tasks to which they put them. In this paper I provide a brief report on the project, retrace the development of macroeconomics, and summarize responses by prominent macroeconomists to a set of questions posed by organizers of the project, while drawing implications of these questions and responses for regional science. I then offer original suggestions from a regional scientist’s perspective on what is missing from the “benchmark” macro-model, how financial frictions can be introduced, how behavioral foundations might be modified, how heterogeneity of agents might be captured, and what new stylized facts need to be explained. I proceed to illustrate how several of the suggested changes can be integrated in economy-wide models by drawing on a study of the impacts of monetary policy on consumption by different income groups in Indonesia. I close the paper by posing a number of “big-picture questions” on the implications of the RMTP for economy-wide modelers and regional scientists to ponder and by offering a brief reflection and aspiration.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document