scholarly journals The impact of prehospital management of trauma patients on outcome of ICU treatment at Emergency center CC "Vojvodina" - one - year experience

2016 ◽  
Vol 63 (2) ◽  
pp. 19-26
Author(s):  
Vesna Pajtic ◽  
Dunja Mihajlovic ◽  
Vladimir Vrsajkov ◽  
Aleksandar Gluhovic ◽  
Slavko Lovrencic
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Trauma Center ◽  
Venous Access ◽  
Emergency Center ◽  
Prehospital Treatment ◽  
Clinical Center ◽  
One Year ◽  
Injured Patients ◽  
The Impact

Impact of prehospital treatment of traumatized patients on treatment outcome in intensive care unit at Emergency center Clinical center of Vojvodina-one year experience Introduction: Trauma is the leading cause of death in 1-44 years old population. Recommendations of prehospital treatment of injured patients rely on the speed of response and transport to referent trauma center, where the patient will be adequately treated. Aim: The aim of our study was to investigate the impact of prehospital treatment and characteristics of patients before admission of patients to Emergency center-Clinical center of Vojvodina on survival of these patients in intensive care unit of Emergency center in order to improve the treatment and outcome of these patients. Material and methods: 209 patients who were treated in intensive care unit after the initial resuscitation in Emergency center-Clinical center of Vojvodina were included in our study. Data were analyzed using SPSS 20.0 software. Differences between groups of patients were assessed by Mann-Whitney U test. Categorical variables were compared using chi-square test. Statistical significance (p) was set at a value of 0.05. Results; Patients with worse outcome were significantly older than patients who had good outcome (49.4?18.5 vs. 63?14.7, p<0.05). Patients with manifestations of hypovolemic shock, respiratory distress and with GCS=8 on admission to Emergency center also had significantly worse outcome. Patients who had been intubated before admission to Emergency center had significantly better outcome in comparison to patients who did not have secured airway (p<0.05). However the placement of venous accessin prehospital setting did not impact survival significantly. Patients who were initially treated in regional hospitals had venous access and airway placement significantly in higher percent than patients treated by emergency medical service. Conclusion: While there is no strong evidence to support the benefits of airway and venous access management in injured patients in prehospital setting, our results suggest that these interventions can be beneficial if the transport to referent trauma center is long and if they are completed by educated medical staff.

scholarly journals A population-based cohort study of mortality of intensive care unit patients with liver cirrhosis

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu-Feng Huang ◽  
Chao-Shun Lin ◽  
Yih-Giun Cherng ◽  
Chun-Chieh Yeh ◽  
Ray-Jade Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Liver Cirrhosis ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Hepatic Coma ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Research Database ◽  
Icu Patients ◽  
Cirrhosis Of Liver ◽  
One Year ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background: The impact of liver cirrhosis on the outcomes of admission to intensive care unit (ICU) is not completely understood. Our purpose is to identify risk factors for mortality in ICU patients with liver cirrhosis. Methods: Using reimbursement claims from Taiwan’s National Health Insurance Research Database from in 2006-2012, 1,250,300 patients were identified as having ICU stays of more than one day, and 37,197 of these had liver cirrhosis. With propensity score-matching for socioeconomic status, pre-existing medical conditions, and cirrhosis-related morbidities, 37,197 ICU patients without liver cirrhosis were selected for comparison. Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of cirrhosis associated with 30-day, ICU, and one-year mortality were calculated. Results: Compared with control, cirrhotic patients had higher 30-day mortality (aOR 1.60, 95% CI 1.53 to 1.68), particularly those with jaundice (aOR 2.23, 95% CI 2.03 to 2.45), ascites (aOR 2.32, 95% CI 2.19 to 2.46) or hepatic coma (aOR 2.21, 95% CI 2.07 to 2.36). Among ICU patients, liver cirrhosis was also associated with ICU mortality (aOR 144, 95% CI 1.38 to 1.51) and one-year mortality (aOR 1.40, 95% CI 1.35 to 1.46). Associations between cirrhosis of liver and increased 30-day mortality were significant in both sexes and every age group. Conclusions: Liver cirrhosis was associated with 30-day mortality in ICU patients. Jaundice, ascites, hepatic coma, more than 4 admissions due to cirrhosis, and more than 30 days of hospital stay due to cirrhosis were exacerbated factors in cirrhotic ICU patients.

scholarly journals A population-based cohort study of mortality of intensive care unit patients with liver cirrhosis

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu-Feng Huang ◽  
Chao-Shun Lin ◽  
Yih-Giun Cherng ◽  
Chun-Chieh Yeh ◽  
Ray-Jade Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Liver Cirrhosis ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Hepatic Coma ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Research Database ◽  
Icu Patients ◽  
Cirrhosis Of Liver ◽  
One Year ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background: The impact of liver cirrhosis on the outcomes of admission to intensive care unit (ICU) is not completely understood. Our purpose is to identify risk factors for mortality in ICU patients with liver cirrhosis. Methods: Using reimbursement claims from Taiwan’s National Health Insurance Research Database from in 2006-2012, 1,250,300 patients were identified as having ICU stays of more than one day, and 37,197 of these had liver cirrhosis. With propensity score-matching for socioeconomic status, pre-existing medical conditions, and cirrhosis-related morbidities, 37,197 ICU patients without liver cirrhosis were selected for comparison. Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of cirrhosis associated with 30-day, ICU, and one-year mortality were calculated. Results: Compared with control, cirrhotic patients had higher 30-day mortality (aOR 1.60, 95% CI 1.53 to 1.68), particularly those with jaundice (aOR 2.23, 95% CI 2.03 to 2.45), ascites (aOR 2.32, 95% CI 2.19 to 2.46) or hepatic coma (aOR 2.21, 95% CI 2.07 to 2.36). Among ICU patients, liver cirrhosis was also associated with ICU mortality (aOR 144, 95% CI 1.38 to 1.51) and one-year mortality (aOR 1.40, 95% CI 1.35 to 1.46). Associations between cirrhosis of liver and increased 30-day mortality were significant in both sexes and every age group. Conclusions: Liver cirrhosis was associated with 30-day mortality in ICU patients. Jaundice, ascites, hepatic coma, more than 4 admissions due to cirrhosis, and more than 30 days of hospital stay due to cirrhosis were exacerbated factors in cirrhotic ICU patients.

scholarly journals The impact of COVID 19 on heart failure hospitalization and management from an Asian perspective

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
X Ruan ◽  
V.H Tan ◽  
W.L Huang ◽  
Y.Z Oh ◽  
Z.W Teo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Clinical Management ◽  
Tertiary Hospital ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
High Dependency ◽  
One Year ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Introduction COVID 19 is a global pandemic that has stretched healthcare resources. We explored the shift in patient demographics and clinical management of systolic heart failure (HF) patients during the COVID 19 outbreak. Purpose To examine the impact of COVID 19 on the hospitalization rates of decompensated systolic HF patients in a tertiary hospital in Asia and delineate differences in the clinical characteristics and management of these patients. Methods Data was extracted from the admission registry for systolic HF patients admitted to the tertiary hospital from January to June 2019 (pre-COVID) and the corresponding time period in 2020 during the COVID outbreak. We compared the demographics, clinical management and outcomes of these patients. Results There was a significant reduction in patients admitted for systolic HF during the COVID period, 174 (6.3%) compared to 240 (8.5%) pre-COVID (p=0.001). The baseline demographics were similar except for the age of patients admitted during the COVID 19 period, which were younger at 66.1±13.5 compared to 69.9±13.9 pre-COVID (p=0.007). The mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was lower during the COVID period (22.9±10.1% vs 24.9±10.1%; p=0.032). More patients during the COVID period were placed on mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (p=0.001) and SGLT2 inhibitors (p&lt;0.001). For those with recurrent admission for systolic HF, the number for HF admissions in the preceding one year was lower during COVID period compared to pre-COVID (0.2±0.5 vs 0.5±1.0 readmissions, p&lt;0.001). There was no COVID 19 infection among those admitted for systolic HF. The 30-day all-cause mortality and readmission rates were comparable between both groups. Cardiac related mortalities were higher during the COVID 19 period compared to the pre-COVID period (77.8% vs 100.0%, p=1.000). No difference was observed in the length of stay nor proportion of patients who required a higher level of care in high dependency or intensive care unit during the COVID outbreak. Those who were admitted during the COVID period were more likely first presentation of decompensated systolic HF, 119 (68.4%) compared to 135 (56.3%) pre-COVID (p=0.014). Conclusion Similar to the existing publications, there was a reduction in patients admitted for HF during the COVID period. However, for those who were admitted, these patients were younger and had lower LVEF. Most of them were first diagnosed with systolic HF during the hospitalizations. For those who had previous history of systolic HF, they had a lower number of HF admissions in the preceding one year compared to those who were admitted during the pre-COVID period. There was no difference in the 30-day mortality and utilization of high dependency or intensive care unit during the COVID outbreak. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.

scholarly journals Local spread of Tn1546-like element among three species of vancomycin resistant enterococci in an intensive care unit

2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (09) ◽  
pp. 684-690
Author(s):  
Milica Jovanovic ◽  
Tanja Tosic ◽  
Snezana Jovanovic ◽  
Goran Stevanovic ◽  
Mitra Drakulovic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Emergency Center ◽  
Local Spread ◽  
Vancomycin Resistant Enterococci ◽  
Clinical Center ◽  
Enterococcal Species ◽  
Vancomycin Resistant ◽  
Horizontal Spread ◽  
The Relationship

Introduction: In an intensive care unit (ICU) of the Emergency Center in the Clinical Center of Serbia, four species of vancomycin resistant enterococci (VRE) were isolated in a 17-month period mostly from blood cultures, including E. faecalis, E. faecium, E. raffinosus and E.gallinarum. Methodology: The relationship between isolates from each species was investigated by PFGE, and PCR experiments for detection of pathogenicity factor genes and van genes to determine the nature of each clone. A PCR-based method, using 10 primer pairs (p1/2-p19/20), was used to investigate the presence of the Tn1546-like structure. Results: PFGE indicated the presence of two different E. faecium clones, while the three other enterococcal species belonged to one clone each. Transposon typing revealed that isolates of E. raffinosus (4), E. gallinarum (4) and E. faecalis (3) yielded gene sequences identical to 10 primer pairs (p1/2-p19/20), suggesting the possibility of identical transposon-like structure in these species. Conclusions: The results of the study indicate probable horizontal spread of Tn1546-like structure in three species of VRE obtained from the same ICU.

Differential impact of on-site or telepharmacy in the intensive care unit: a controlled before–after study

2021 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Joao Gabriel Rosa Ramos ◽  
Sandra Cristina Hernandes ◽  
Talita Teles Teixeira Pereira ◽  
Shana Oliveira ◽  
Denis de Melo Soares ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Differential Impact ◽  
Scarce Resources ◽  
Clinical Pharmacists ◽  
Versus Phase ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Clinical pharmacists have an important role in the intensive care unit (ICU) team but are scarce resources. Our aim was to evaluate the impact of on-site pharmacists on medical prescriptions in the ICU. Methods This is a retrospective, quasi-experimental, controlled before-after study in two ICUs. Interventions by pharmacists were evaluated in phase 1 (February to November 2016) and phase 2 (February to May 2017) in ICU A (intervention) and ICU B (control). In phase 1, both ICUs had a telepharmacy service in which medical prescriptions were evaluated and interventions were made remotely. In phase 2, an on-site pharmacist was implemented in ICU A, but not in ICU B. We compared the number of interventions that were accepted in phase 1 versus phase 2. Results During the study period, 8797/9603 (91.6%) prescriptions were evaluated, and 935 (10.6%) needed intervention. In phase 2, there was an increase in the proportion of interventions that were accepted by the physician in comparison to phase 1 (93.9% versus 76.8%, P &lt; 0.001) in ICU A, but there was no change in ICU B (75.2% versus 73.9%, P = 0.845). Conclusion An on-site pharmacist in the ICU was associated with an increase in the proportion of interventions that were accepted by physicians.

The presence of liver cirrhosis is a strong negative predictor of survival for patients admitted to the intensive care unit – Cirrhosis in intensive care patients

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jörg Bojunga ◽  
Mireen Friedrich-Rust ◽  
Alica Kubesch ◽  
Kai Henrik Peiffer ◽  
Hannes Abramowski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Liver Cirrhosis ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Intensive Care Treatment ◽  
Matched Cohort ◽  
Care Treatment ◽  
Cirrhotic Patients ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Cirrhotic Group

Abstract Background and Aims Liver cirrhosis is a systemic disease that substantially impacts the body’s physiology, especially in advanced stages. Accordingly, the outcome of patients with cirrhosis requiring intensive care treatment is poor. We aimed to analyze the impact of cirrhosis on mortality of intensive care unit (ICU) patients compared to other frequent chronic diseases and conditions. Methods In this retrospective study, patients admitted over three years to the ICU of the Department of Medicine of the University Hospital Frankfurt were included. Patients were matched for age, gender, pre-existing conditions, simplified acute physiology score (SAPS II), and therapeutic intervention scoring system (TISS). Results A total of 567 patients admitted to the ICU were included in the study; 99 (17.5 %) patients had liver cirrhosis. A total of 129 patients were included in the matched cohort for the sensitivity analysis. In-hospital mortality was higher in cirrhotic patients than non-cirrhotic patients (p < 0.0001) in the entire and matched cohort. Liver cirrhosis remained one of the strongest independent predictors of in-hospital mortality (entire cohort p = 0.001; matched cohort p = 0.03) along with dialysis and need for transfusion in the multivariate logistic regression analysis. Furthermore, in the cirrhotic group, the need for kidney replacement therapy (p < 0.001) and blood transfusion (p < 0.001) was significantly higher than in the non-cirrhotic group.  Conclusions In the presented study, liver cirrhosis was one of the strongest predictors of in-hospital mortality in patients needing intensive care treatment along with dialysis and the need for ventilation. Therefore, concerted efforts are needed to improve cirrhotic patients’ outcomes, prevent disease progression, and avoid complications with the need for ICU treatment in the early stages of the disease.

scholarly journals 375. COVID 19 infection in a Massachusetts community hospital

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S257-S258
Author(s):  
Raul Davaro ◽  
alwyn rapose
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Essential Hypertension ◽  
Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome ◽  
High Mortality ◽  
Case Series ◽  
World Health ◽  
Minimal Risk ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background The ongoing pandemic of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections has led to 105690 cases and 7647 deaths in Massachusetts as of June 16. Methods The study was conducted at Saint Vincent Hospital, an academic health medical center in Worcester, Massachusetts. The institutional review board approved this case series as minimal-risk research using data collected for routine clinical practice and waived the requirement for informed consent. All consecutive patients who were sufficiently medically ill to require hospital admission with confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection by positive result on polymerase chain reaction testing of a nasopharyngeal sample were included. Results A total of 109 consecutive patients with COVID 19 were admitted between March 15 and May 31. Sixty one percent were men, the mean age of the cohort was 67. Forty one patients (37%) were transferred from nursing homes. Twenty seven patients died (24%) and the majority of the dead patients were men (62%). Fifty one patients (46%) required admission to the medical intensive care unit and 34 necessitated mechanical ventilation, twenty two patients on mechanical ventilation died (63%). The most common co-morbidities were essential hypertension (65%), obesity (60%), diabetes (33%), chronic kidney disease (22%), morbid obesity (11%), congestive heart failure (16%) and COPD (14%). Five patients required hemodialysis. Fifty five patients received hydroxychloroquine, 24 received tocilizumab, 20 received convalescent plasma and 16 received remdesivir. COVID 19 appeared in China in late 2019 and was declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization on March 11, 2020. Our study showed a high mortality in patients requiring mechanical ventilation (43%) as opposed to those who did not (5.7%). Hypertension, diabetes and obesity were highly prevalent in this aging population. Our cohort was too small to explore the impact of treatment with remdesivir, tocilizumab or convalescent plasma. Conclusion In this cohort obesity, diabetes and essential hypertension are risk factors associated with high mortality. Patients admitted to the intensive care unit who need mechanical ventilation have a mortality approaching 50 %. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

The (Absence of a) Role of Venous Duplex Scan in the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Embolism after Severe Trauma

2006 ◽  
Vol 72 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-10
Author(s):  
George C. Velmahos ◽  
Carlos V. Brown ◽  
Demetrios Demetriades
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Sensitivity And Specificity ◽  
Clinical Suspicion ◽  
Severely Injured ◽  
Duplex Scan ◽  
Severely Injured Patients ◽  
High Level ◽  
Injured Patients

Venous duplex scan (VDS) has been used for interim bedside diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE) in severely injured patients deemed to be at risk if transported out of the intensive care unit. In combination with the level of clinical suspicion for PE, VDS helps select patients for temporary treatment until definitive diagnosis is made. We evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of VDS in critically injured patients with a high level of clinical suspicion for PE. We performed a prospective observational cohort study at the surgical intensive care unit of an academic level 1 trauma center. Patients were 59 critically injured patients suspected to have PE over a 30-month period. The level of clinical suspicion for PE was classified as low or high according to preset criteria. Interventions were VDS and a PE outcome test (conventional or computed tomographic pulmonary angiography). The sensitivity and specificity of VDS to detect PE in all patients and in patients with high level of clinical suspicion was calculated against the results of the outcome test. PE was diagnosed in 21 patients (35.5%). The sensitivity and specificity of VDS was 33 per cent and 89 per cent, respectively. Among the 28 patients who had a high level of clinical suspicion for PE, the sensitivity of VDS was 23 per cent and the specificity 93 per cent. In this latter population, 1 of the 4 (25%) positive VDS was of a patient without PE and 10 of the 24 (42%) negative VDS were of patients who had PE. VDS does not accurately predict PE in severely injured patients, even in the presence of a high level of clinical suspicion.

Māori health outcomes in an intensive care unit in Aotearoa New Zealand

2021 ◽  
pp. 0310057X2198971
Author(s):  
M Atif Mohd Slim ◽  
Hamish M Lala ◽  
Nicholas Barnes ◽  
Robert A Martynoga
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
New Zealand ◽  
Renal Replacement Therapy ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Health Outcomes ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Adjusted Odds Ratio ◽  
One Year ◽  
Maori Health

Māori are the indigenous people of New Zealand, and suffer disparate health outcomes compared to non-Māori. Waikato District Health Board provides level III intensive care unit services to New Zealand’s Midland region. In 2016, our institution formalised a corporate strategy to eliminate health inequities for Māori. Our study aimed to describe Māori health outcomes in our intensive care unit and identify inequities. We performed a retrospective audit of prospectively entered data in the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society database for all general intensive care unit admissions over 15 years of age to Waikato Hospital from 2014 to 2018 ( n = 3009). Primary outcomes were in–intensive care unit and in-hospital mortality. The secondary outcome was one-year mortality. In our study, Māori were over-represented relative to the general population. Compared to non-Māori, Māori patients were younger (51 versus 61 years, P < 0.001), and were more likely to reside outside of the Waikato region (37.2% versus 28.0%, P < 0.001) and in areas of higher deprivation ( P < 0.001). Māori had higher admission rates for trauma and sepsis ( P < 0.001 overall) and required more renal replacement therapy ( P < 0.001). There was no difference in crude and adjusted mortality in–intensive care unit (16.8% versus 16.5%, P = 0.853; adjusted odds ratio 0.98 (95% confidence interval 0.68 to 1.40)) or in-hospital (23.7% versus 25.7%, P = 0.269; adjusted odds ratio 0.84 (95% confidence interval 0.60 to 1.18)). One-year mortality was similar (26.1% versus 27.1%, P=0.6823). Our study found significant ethnic inequity in the intensive care unit for Māori, who require more renal replacement therapy and are over-represented in admissions, especially for trauma and sepsis. These findings suggest upstream factors increasing Māori risk for critical illness. There was no difference in mortality outcomes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document