scholarly journals Latest Reactor Neutrino Oscillation Results from the Daya Bay Experiment

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bedrich Roskovec ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Mario A. Acero ◽  
Alexis A. Aguilar-Arevalo ◽  
Dairo J. Polo-Toledo

We present a neutrino oscillation analysis of two particular data sets from the Daya Bay and RENO reactor neutrino experiments aiming to study the increase in precision in the oscillation parameters sin22θ13 and the effective mass splitting Δmee2 gained by combining two relatively simple to reproduce analyses available in the literature. For Daya Bay, the data from 217 days between December 2011 and July 2012 were used. For RENO, we used the data from 500 live days between August 2011 and January 2012. We reproduce reasonably well the results of the individual analyses, both rate-only and spectral, defining a suitable χ2 statistic for each case. Finally, we performed a combined spectral analysis and extract tighter constraints on the parameters, with an improved precision between 30 and 40% with respect to the individual analyses considered.


2012 ◽  
Vol 27 (08) ◽  
pp. 1230010 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. MARIANI

In this document we will review the current status of reactor neutrino oscillation experiments and present their physics potentials for measuring the θ13 neutrino mixing angle. The neutrino mixing angle θ13 is currently a high-priority topic in the field of neutrino physics. There are currently three different reactor neutrino experiments, DOUBLE CHOOZ, DAYA BAY and RENO and a few accelerator neutrino experiments searching for neutrino oscillations induced by this angle. A description of the reactor experiments searching for a nonzero value of θ13 is given, along with a discussion of the sensitivities that these experiments can reach in the near future.


2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sin Kyu Kang ◽  
Yeong-Duk Kim ◽  
Young-Ju Ko ◽  
Kim Siyeon

The masses of sterile neutrinos are not yet known, and depending on the orders of magnitudes, their existence may explain reactor anomalies or the spectral shape of reactor neutrino events at 1.5 km baseline detector. Here, we present four-neutrino analysis of the results announced by RENO and Daya Bay, which performed the definitive measurements ofθ13based on the disappearance of reactor antineutrinos at km order baselines. Our results using 3 + 1 scheme include the exclusion curve ofΔm412versusθ14and the adjustment ofθ13due to correlation withθ14. The value ofθ13obtained by RENO and Daya Bay with a three-neutrino oscillation analysis is included in the1σinterval ofθ13allowed by our four-neutrino analysis.


2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
Thamys Abrahão ◽  
Hisakazu Minakata ◽  
Hiroshi Nunokawa ◽  
Alexander A. Quiroga

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yong Du ◽  
Hao-Lin Li ◽  
Jian Tang ◽  
Sampsa Vihonen ◽  
Jiang-Hao Yu

Abstract The Standard Model Effective Field Theory (SMEFT) provides a systematic and model-independent framework to study neutrino non-standard interactions (NSIs). We study the constraining power of the on-going neutrino oscillation experiments T2K, NOνA, Daya Bay, Double Chooz and RENO in the SMEFT framework. A full consideration of matching is provided between different effective field theories and the renormalization group running at different scales, filling the gap between the low-energy neutrino oscillation experiments and SMEFT at the UV scale. We first illustrate our method with a top- down approach in a simplified scalar leptoquark model, showing more stringent constraints from the neutrino oscillation experiments compared to collider studies. We then provide a bottom-up study on individual dimension-6 SMEFT operators and find NSIs in neutrino experiments already sensitive to new physics at ∼20 TeV when the Wilson coefficients are fixed at unity. We also investigate the correlation among multiple operators at the UV scale and find it could change the constraints on SMEFT operators by several orders of magnitude compared with when only one operator is considered. Furthermore, we find that accelerator and reactor neutrino experiments are sensitive to different SMEFT operators, which highlights the complementarity of the two experiment types.


2012 ◽  
Vol 396 (2) ◽  
pp. 022061 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qingmin Zhang ◽  
Miao He ◽  
Jilei Xu ◽  
Jiaheng Zou ◽  
Zhe Ning ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document