scholarly journals Very forward energy distributions and jet production observed with CASTOR in CMS

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alex Van Spilbeeck ◽  
Sebastian Baur ◽  
Hauke Wohrmann ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Energy Distributions ◽  
Jet Production ◽  
Forward Energy

Forward physics results on jet production and energy flow at the LHC

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (04) ◽  
pp. 2030001
Author(s):  
Sunil Bansal ◽  
Hans Van Haevermaet
Keyword(s):  
Phase Space ◽  
Energy Flow ◽  
Center Of Mass ◽  
Forward Physics ◽  
Flow Measurements ◽  
Proton Proton ◽  
Proton Collisions ◽  
Jet Production ◽  
Forward Energy ◽  
Proton Proton Collisions

In this paper, we present a review of forward physics measurements performed with LHC Runs 1 and 2 data. In particular, measurements based on proton–proton collisions with different center-of-mass energies (0.9–13 TeV) are reviewed. We focus on measurements exploring the forward phase space using the available instrumentation at the different LHC experiments, and report on forward jet and forward energy flow measurements.

Scattering of Low-Energy (5-12 eV) C2D4•+ Ions from Room-Temperature Carbon Surfaces

2008 ◽  
Vol 73 (6-7) ◽  
pp. 755-770 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andriy Pysanenko ◽  
Ján Žabka ◽  
Zdeněk Herman
Keyword(s):  
Survival Probability ◽  
Room Temperature ◽  
Incident Angle ◽  
Pyrolytic Graphite ◽  
Carbon Surface ◽  
Translational Energy ◽  
Energy Distributions ◽  
Surface Mass ◽  
Fragment Ions ◽  
Product Ions

The scattering of the hydrocarbon radical cation C2D4•+ from room-temperature carbon (highly oriented pyrolytic graphite, HOPG) surface was investigated at low incident energies of 6-12 eV. Mass spectra, angular and translational energy distributions of product ions were measured. From these data, information on processes at surfaces, absolute ion survival probability, and kinematics of the collision was obtained. The projectile ion showed both inelastic, dissociative and reactive scattering, namely the occurrence of H-atom transfer reaction with hydrocarbons present on the room-temperature carbon surface. The absolute survival probability of the ions for the incident angle of 30° (with respect to the surface) decreased from about 1.0% (16 eV) towards zero at incident energies below 10 eV. Estimation of the effective surface mass involved in the collision process led to m(S)eff of about 57 a.m.u. for inelastic non-dissociative collisions of C2D4•+ and of about 115 a.m.u. for fragment ions (C2D3+, C2D2•+) and ions formed in reactive surface collisions (C2D4H+, C2D2H+, contributions to C2D3+ and C2D2•+). This suggested a rather complex interaction between the projectile ion and the hydrocarbon-covered surface during the collision.

Charge Transfer Between CO22+ and Ar or Ne at Collision Energies 3-10 eV

2003 ◽  
Vol 68 (1) ◽  
pp. 178-188 ◽  
Author(s):  
Libor Mrázek ◽  
Ján Žabka ◽  
Zdeněk Dolejšek ◽  
Zdeněk Herman
Keyword(s):  
Charge Transfer ◽  
Excited States ◽  
Ground State ◽  
Scattering Method ◽  
Translational Energy ◽  
Centre Of Mass ◽  
Energy Distributions ◽  
Zener Model ◽  
Beam Scattering ◽  
Product Ions

The beam scattering method was used to investigate non-dissociative single-electron charge transfer between the molecular dication CO22+ and Ar or Ne at several collision energies between 3-10 eV (centre-of-mass, c.m.). Relative translational energy distributions of the product ions showed that in the reaction with Ar the CO2+ product was mainly formed in reactions of the ground state of the dication, CO22+(X3Σg-), leading to the excited states of the product CO2+(A2Πu) and CO2+(B2Σu+). In the reaction with Ne, the largest probability had the process from the reactant dication excited state CO22+(1Σg+) leading to the product ion ground state CO2+(X2Πg). Less probable were processes between the other excited states of the dication CO22+, (1∆g), (1Σu-), (3∆u), also leading to the product ion ground state CO2+(X2Πg). Using the Landau-Zener model of the reaction window, relative populations of the ground and excited states of the dication CO22+ in the reactant beam were roughly estimated as (X3Σg):(1∆g):(1Σg+):(1Σu-):(3∆u) = 1.0:0.6:0.5:0.25:0.25.

Analysis of NiMoP/γ-Al2O3 Catalyst Preparation with Impregnation and Microwave Polyol Methods for Bio-Jet Production

2020 ◽  
Vol 1000 ◽  
pp. 257-264
Author(s):  
Bambang Heru Susanto ◽  
Joshua Raymond Valentino Siallagan
Keyword(s):  
Coconut Oil ◽  
Catalyst Preparation ◽  
Operating Conditions ◽  
Catalyst Loading ◽  
Impregnation Method ◽  
Conversion Yield ◽  
Jet Production ◽  
Cracking Process ◽  
Catalyst Impregnation ◽  
Rate Conversion

Bio-Jet could be produced by the synthesis of vegetable oil through the hydrodeoxygenation, decarboxylation, decarbonization, and catalytic cracking process. Physical characteristics, activities, and selectivity of the catalyst used will determine the rate, conversion, and yield of the reaction that being carried out. This study aims to compare and obtain the best characteristics of NiMoP/γ-Al2O3 catalysts synthesized using two types of preparation, impregnation and microwave polyol methods, which will be used for bio-jet production. The impregnation method takes more than 24 hours for catalyst preparation, while microwave polyols that use microwaves can synthesize catalysts faster. Both catalysts have almost the same loading on the weight of the catalyst, which in the microwave polyol method has a more dispersed promotor and active site, although the crystallinity level is deficient and tends to be amorphous compared to the impregnation method with high crystallinity. In bio-jet synthesis reaction with operating conditions of 5% catalyst loading by comparison to Coconut Oil, 400°C, and 15 bar, the conversion, yield, and selectivity of catalyst impregnation were 91.705%, 47.639%, and 84.511%, while microwave polyol catalysts were 90.296%, 42.752%, and 82.517%, respectively. In conclusion, microwave polyol provides a more effective and efficient preparation method.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document