scholarly journals Dynamic value assessments in oncology supported by the PACE Continuous Innovation Indicators

2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (25) ◽  
pp. 2253-2264 ◽  
Author(s):  
Silvia Paddock ◽  
Clifford Goodman ◽  
Scott Shortenhaus ◽  
David Grainger ◽  
Jacqueline Zummo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Continuous Innovation ◽  
Innovation Indicators

scholarly journals Pace Continuous Innovation Indicators Data Support Dynamic Value Assessments Of Pharmaceuticals

2016 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. A107
Author(s):  
S Thomas ◽  
C Goodman ◽  
S Paddock ◽  
SH Shortenhaus ◽  
J Ferguson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Continuous Innovation ◽  
Data Support ◽  
Innovation Indicators

scholarly journals Approving cancer treatments based on endpoints other than overall survival: an analysis of historical data using the PACE Continuous Innovation Indicators™ (CII)

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neon Brooks ◽  
Mario Campone ◽  
Silvia Paddock ◽  
Scott Shortenhaus ◽  
David Grainger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Historical Data ◽  
Cancer Treatments ◽  
Continuous Innovation ◽  
Innovation Indicators

scholarly journals Assessing the impact of clinical trial designs on progress against cancer using the PACE Continuous Innovation Indicators™

2016 ◽  
Vol 27 ◽  
pp. vi351
Author(s):  
S. Paddock ◽  
S. Thomas ◽  
A. Kanli ◽  
J. Zummo ◽  
D. Grainger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Continuous Innovation ◽  
Clinical Trial Designs ◽  
Innovation Indicators ◽  
The Impact

1211 Continuous Innovation Indicators™ - a flexible tool to evaluate progress in cancer treatments

2015 ◽  
Vol 51 ◽  
pp. S175
Author(s):  
S. Paddock ◽  
L. Brum ◽  
K. Sorrow ◽  
S. Thomas ◽  
S. Spence ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Treatments ◽  
Flexible Tool ◽  
Continuous Innovation ◽  
Innovation Indicators

The PACE continuous innovation Indicators: A flexible tool to evaluate progress in cancer treatments.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e17783-e17783 ◽  
Author(s):  
Silvia Paddock ◽  
Lauren Brum ◽  
Kathleen Sorrow ◽  
Samuel Thomas ◽  
Susan Spence ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Treatments ◽  
Flexible Tool ◽  
Continuous Innovation ◽  
Innovation Indicators

A Case Study on the Un-Used Capacity Assessment Using Time Driven Activity Based Costing for Magnetic Components

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 18-39
Author(s):  
Areena Zaini ◽  
Haryantie Kamil ◽  
Mohd Yazid Abu
Keyword(s):  
Historical Data ◽  
Manufacturing Sector ◽  
Type I ◽  
Activity Based Costing ◽  
Cost Rate ◽  
Continuous Innovation ◽  
Magnetic Components ◽  
Alignment Process ◽  
Capacity Cost

The Electrical & Electronic (E&E) company is one of Malaysia’s leading industries that has 24.5% in manufacturing sector production. With a continuous innovation of E&E company, the current costing being used is hardly to access the complete activities with variations required for each workstation to measure the un-used capacity in term of resources and cost. The objective of this work is to develop a new costing structure using time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC) at . This data collection was obtained at E&E company located at Kuantan, Pahang that focusing on magnetic component. The historical data was considered in 2018. TDABC is used to measure the un-used capacity by constructing the time equation and capacity cost rate. This work found three conditions of un-used capacity. Type I is pessimistic situation whereby according to winding toroid core, the un-used capacity of time and cost are -14820 hours and -MYR2.60 respectively. It means the system must sacrifice the time and cost more than actual apportionment. Type II is most likely situation whereby according to assembly process, the un-used capacity of time and cost are 7400 hours and MYR201575.45 respectively. It means the system minimize the time and cost which close to fully utilize from the actual apportionment. Type III is optimistic situation whereby according to alignment process, the un-used capacity of time and cost are 4120 hours and MYR289217.15 respectively. It means the system used small amount of cost and time from the actual apportionment.

scholarly journals Plant Variety Protection: Current Practices and Insights

Genes ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (8) ◽  
pp. 1127
Author(s):  
Ju-Kyung Yu ◽  
Yong-Suk Chung
Keyword(s):  
Molecular Markers ◽  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Stability Testing ◽  
International Union ◽  
Plant Variety Protection ◽  
Common System ◽  
Continuous Innovation ◽  
Plant Variety ◽  
New Varieties ◽  
Variety Protection

Breeders persistently supply farmers with the best varieties in order to exceed consumer demand through plant-breeding processes that are resource-intensive. In order to motivate continuous innovation in variety development, a system needs to provide incentives for plant breeders to develop superior varieties, for example, exclusive ownership to produce and market those varieties. The most common system is the acquisition of intellectual property protection through plant variety protection, also known as the breeder’s right. Most countries have adopted the system established by the International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants (UPOV). To be granted plant variety protection, the variety should prove to be unique by meeting three requirements: distinctness, uniformity, and stability. This review summarizes (1) the plant variety protection via UPOV convention, (2) technical methods for distinctness, uniformity, and stability testing via phenotype, molecular markers, and sequencing as well as their challenges and potentiality, and (3) additional discussions in essentially derived variety, value for cultivation and use testing, and open source seed initiative.

scholarly journals Toward A Business Resilience Framework for Startups

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 3132
Author(s):  
Leo Aldianto ◽  
Grisna Anggadwita ◽  
Anggraeni Permatasari ◽  
Isti Raafaldini Mirzanti ◽  
Ian O. Williamson
Keyword(s):  
Innovation Process ◽  
Dynamic Capability ◽  
Case Study Approach ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
Study Approach ◽  
Continuous Innovation ◽  
Technology Capability ◽  
Resilience Framework ◽  
Business Resilience

Covid-19 has had a significant impact on the disruption of the global economic sector, including for startup businesses. This encourages entrepreneurs to carry out a continuous innovation process to become more ambidextrous and continue to innovate in an effort to futureproof their business. The paper aims to provide a business resilience framework by exploring capability (innovation ambidexterity, dynamic capability, and technology capability), behavior (agile leadership), and knowledge (knowledge stock) in startup businesses. This study uses a literature review synthesis to gain a greater understanding of startup resilience and its implementation. This study also uses a case study approach in building a framework by obtaining data from semi-structured interviews with three startups owners in Indonesia. This preliminary research has identified four propositions that will be used to develop questionnaires and data collection instruments. Thus, this study provides new insights on how startups can overcome contradictory pressures for business resilience in anticipating, dealing with, and emerging from business turbulence due to the Covid-19 pandemic by considering the factors proposed in this study. The implications and recommendations of this study are also discussed in detail.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document