scholarly journals Location of Large-Scale Retail Stores under Economic Regulation and their Impact Assessment on Neighborhood Environment

2001 ◽  
Vol 18 ◽  
pp. 181-186 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shoji MATSUMOTO ◽  
Toshio MURATA ◽  
Kazuhiro MIYAKOSHI
Keyword(s):  
Impact Assessment ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Neighborhood Environment ◽  
Economic Regulation ◽  
Retail Stores

EgoCart: a Benchmark Dataset for Large-Scale Indoor Image-Based Localization in Retail Stores

2019 ◽  
pp. 1-1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emiliano Spera ◽  
Antonino Furnari ◽  
Sebastiano Battiato ◽  
Giovanni Maria Farinella
Keyword(s):  
Large Scale ◽  
Benchmark Dataset ◽  
Retail Stores

A Study on Location Control of Large-Scale Retail Stores on the Municipal Level

2002 ◽  
Vol 37 (0) ◽  
pp. 811-816
Author(s):  
Michio Ubaura ◽  
Hideki Koizumi ◽  
Junichiro Okata
Keyword(s):  
Large Scale ◽  
Retail Stores ◽  
Municipal Level

scholarly journals Failure Impact Assessment for Large-Scale Landslides Located Near Human Settlement: Case Study in Southern Taiwan

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 1491 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ming-Chien Chung ◽  
Chien-Hsin Chen ◽  
Ching-Fang Lee ◽  
Wei-Kai Huang ◽  
Chih-Hao Tan
Keyword(s):  
Impact Assessment ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Human Settlement ◽  
Southern Taiwan

A Study on Location Control of Large-Scale Retail Stores on the Municipal Level

2002 ◽  
Vol 37 (0) ◽  
pp. 811-811
Author(s):  
Michio Ubaura ◽  
Hideki Koizumi ◽  
Junichiro Okata
Keyword(s):  
Large Scale ◽  
Retail Stores ◽  
Municipal Level

scholarly journals Avoiding impacts on biodiversity through strengthening the first stage of the mitigation hierarchy

Oryx ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 52 (2) ◽  
pp. 316-324 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ben Phalan ◽  
Genevieve Hayes ◽  
Sharon Brooks ◽  
David Marsh ◽  
Pippa Howard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Ecosystem Services ◽  
Impact Assessment ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Decision Makers ◽  
Technical Knowledge ◽  
Political Will ◽  
Building Capacity ◽  
Mitigation Hierarchy ◽  
Conservation Organizations

AbstractThe mitigation hierarchy is a decision-making framework designed to address impacts on biodiversity and ecosystem services through first seeking to avoid impacts wherever possible, then minimizing or restoring impacts, and finally by offsetting any unavoidable impacts. Avoiding impacts is seen by many as the most certain and effective way of managing harm to biodiversity, and its position as the first stage of the mitigation hierarchy indicates that it should be prioritized ahead of other stages. However, despite an abundance of legislative and voluntary requirements, there is often a failure to avoid impacts. We discuss reasons for this failure and outline some possible solutions. We highlight the key roles that can be played by conservation organizations in cultivating political will, holding decision makers accountable to the law, improving the processes of impact assessment and avoidance, building capacity, and providing technical knowledge. A renewed focus on impact avoidance as the foundation of the mitigation hierarchy could help to limit the impacts on biodiversity of large-scale developments in energy, infrastructure, agriculture and other sectors.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document