Can the "Yelp Effect" Be Reversed? Dealing with Patients' Expectations for Antibiotics (Preprint)
BACKGROUND The overuse of antibiotics has rapidly made antimicrobial resistance a global public health challenge. There is an emerging trend where providers who perceive that their patients expect antibiotics are more likely to prescribe antibiotics unprompted or upon request.1 Particularly, health care providers have expressed concern that dissatisfied patients will provide disparaging online reviews therefore threatening the reputation of the practice.2 To better deal with the negative reviews and inform patients, some health care staff directly respond to patients' online feedback.3 Engaging with patients’ online reviews gives providers an opportunity to prevent reputational damage and improve patients’ understanding of the antibiotic resistance problem. OBJECTIVE We aim to suggest and test the effectiveness of different response strategies to the negative patient online reviews on the readers’ perceptions of the health care provider and their perceptions related to antibiotics resistance. METHODS Two experimental surveys were conducted to examine the impact of message tactics (apologizing, inducing fear or guilt) that can be employed by healthcare providers when responding to patients’ negative online feedback related to not receiving an antibiotic. RESULTS Overall, our results demonstrated positive impacts of responding to patients’ online reviews. In Study 1, we found an apologetic messaging and using emotional appeals in the response were effective in making readers feel more favorable toward the message. Readers also expressed greater credibility perception toward the provider when emotional appeals were used. Findings from study 2 largely supported the effectiveness of fear-inducing response in improving the readers’ misconception and unrealistic expectation for antibiotics. CONCLUSIONS This paper demonstrated that a strategic response to patient online complaints can prevent reputational damage and help to minimize the potential negative impacts of the review. The results also glean insight into the step toward developing a novel intervention--crafting a persuasive response to patients’ negative feedback that can help to improve the understanding of antibiotic resistance problems.