How will notes change? An Exploratory Study of the Effect of OpenNotes on Oncology Documentation (Preprint)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maryam Rahimian ◽  
Jeremy L. Warner ◽  
S. Trent Rosenbloom ◽  
Roger B. Davis ◽  
Robin Marie Joyce

BACKGROUND In 2010, OpenNotes began as a concept for patients to track their medical information through online patient portals. The goal of OpenNotes is to promote patient access to doctor’s visit notes and improve transparency and communication between clinicians and patients. OBJECTIVE To determine if implementing OpenNotes at a hematology/oncology practice has changed providers’ documentation style, we assessed the length and readability of clinicians’ notes before and after the OpenNotes adoption at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA. METHODS We analyzed 143,888 notes from 60 hematology/oncology clinicians from January 1, 2012, to September 1, 2016; before and after the OpenNotes debut at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center. We measured the effect of OpenNotes on provider’s documentation styles by analyzing character length, number of addenda, note entry mode (dictated vs typed) and note readability as measured using five different readability formulas before and after the introduction of OpenNotes. RESULTS Mean length of progress notes increased from 6174 to 6648 characters after the introduction of OpenNotes (P<0.001). There was also an increase from 1435 to 1597 in mean character length of “Assessment and Plan” section of progress notes (P<0.001). Average Grade Level Readability of progress notes decreased from 11.50 to 11.33 and their overall readability improved (P=0.01). There were no statistically significant changes in the length or readability of “Initial Notes” or Letters, inter-doctor communication, nor in the modality of the recording of any kind of note. CONCLUSIONS After the implementation of OpenNotes, progress notes and assessment and plan sections became both longer and easier to read. This suggests that clinician documenters are responding to the pressures of the OpenNotes environment with changes that are positive for patients.

JAMIA Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maryam Rahimian ◽  
Jeremy L Warner ◽  
Liz Salmi ◽  
S Trent Rosenbloom ◽  
Roger B Davis ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective The effects of shared clinical notes on patients, care partners, and clinicians (“open notes”) were first studied as a demonstration project in 2010. Since then, multiple studies have shown clinicians agree shared progress notes are beneficial to patients, and patients and care partners report benefits from reading notes. To determine if implementing open notes at a hematology/oncology practice changed providers’ documentation style, we assessed the length and readability of clinicians’ notes before and after open notes implementation at an academic medical center in Boston, MA, USA. Materials and Methods We analyzed 143 888 notes from 60 hematology/oncology clinicians before and after the open notes debut at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, from January 1, 2012 to September 1, 2016. We measured the providers’ (medical doctor/nurse practitioner) documentation styles by analyzing character length, the number of addenda, note entry mode (dictated vs typed), and note readability. Measurements used 5 different readability formulas and were assessed on notes written before and after the introduction of open notes on November 25, 2013. Results After the introduction of open notes, the mean length of progress notes increased from 6174 characters to 6648 characters (P &lt; .001), and the mean character length of the “assessment and plan” (A&P) increased from 1435 characters to 1597 characters (P &lt; .001). The Average Grade Level Readability of progress notes decreased from 11.50 to 11.33, and overall readability improved by 0.17 (P = .01). There were no statistically significant changes in the length or readability of “Initial Notes” or Letters, inter-doctor communication, nor in the modality of the recording of any kind of note. Conclusions After the implementation of open notes, progress notes and A&P sections became both longer and easier to read. This suggests clinician documenters may be responding to the perceived pressures of a transparent medical records environment.


2019 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maryam Rahimian ◽  
Jeremy L. Warner ◽  
Sandeep K. Jain ◽  
Roger B. Davis ◽  
Jessica A. Zerillo ◽  
...  

PURPOSE OpenNotes is a national movement established in 2010 that gives patients access to their visit notes through online patient portals, and its goal is to improve transparency and communication. To determine whether granting patients access to their medical notes will have a measurable effect on provider behavior, we developed novel methods to quantify changes in the length and frequency of use of n-grams (sets of words used in exact sequence) in the notes. METHODS We analyzed 102,135 notes of 36 hematology/oncology clinicians before and after the OpenNotes debut at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center. We applied methods to quantify changes in the length and frequency of use of sequential co-occurrence of words ( n-grams) in the unstructured content of the notes by unsupervised hierarchical clustering and proportional analysis of n-grams. RESULTS The number of significant n-grams averaged over all providers did not change, but for individual providers, there were significant changes. That is, all significant observed changes were provider specific. We identified eight providers who were late note signers. This group significantly reduced its late signing behavior after OpenNotes implementation. CONCLUSION Although the number of significant n-grams averaged over all providers did not change, our text-mining method detected major content changes in specific providers’ documentation at the n-gram level. The method successfully identified a group of providers who decreased their late note signing behavior.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yauheni Solad ◽  
Shrawan Patel ◽  
Allen Hsiao ◽  
Ashish Atreja

BACKGROUND Patient portals provide a simplified route for health providers to share medical information with individual patients, and are incentivized under Meaningful Use. Currently there are numerous friction factors in the onboarding process of patient portals that limits patients signing up for them. As a result, health systems are spending significant resources to drive the adoption of patient portals, with limited success. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effectiveness of a innovative rules-driven digital patient engagement strategy for patients to sign up for online patient portal at an academic medical center. METHODS Rx.Universe is a digital platform integrated into provider EMR systems that enables physicians to directly “prescribe” mobile health applications and/or digital care bundles to patients. Rx.Universe Bulk Prescription feature was used to prescribe—via SMS—a direct link to the MyChart login page with the patient’s unique code and personal information embedded within the link. This removed several key barriers to adoption: patients needing to copy and paste access codes, fill in their personal data and complete this process within 30 days—after which their unique access code expires. The Rx.Universe engagement dashboard displayed the total number of patients who received prescribed messages, the number of unsuccessful prescriptions, prescriptions opened in the first 24 hours, and total prescriptions opened. RESULTS We digitally prescribed MyChart Activation to 23,485 patients under the care of Yale-New Haven Hospital over a period of 2 days. Of these prescriptions, 21,997 (93.66%) were successfully delivered and 1488 (6.33%) failed to be delivered because of incorrect cell phone numbers in EHR. Of the prescriptions successfully prescribed, 2170 (9.86%) were clicked within 24 hours of being prescribed with a total of 2378 (10.81%) clicked within a week. CONCLUSIONS Digital Medicine Platforms offer new channel for onboarding and following up patients through customized digital care plans. The power of this approach in removing barriers for patients is highlighted by the fact that Yale-New Haven Hospital met their yearly MyChart adoption target through this campaign within a week. Furthermore, the data could be assessed and acted upon in real-time as opposed to the usual weeks. This technology can be extended to close the care gaps for hospitals and Accountable Care Organizations (ACO) in a scalable manner for a subpopulation, with manual processes reserved for patients unable to be reached in an automated fashion.


Author(s):  
Ayala Kobo-Greenhut ◽  
Ortal Sharlin ◽  
Yael Adler ◽  
Nitza Peer ◽  
Vered H Eisenberg ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Preventing medical errors is crucial, especially during crises like the COVID-19 pandemic. Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) is the most widely used prospective hazard analysis in healthcare. FMEA relies on brainstorming by multi-disciplinary teams to identify hazards. This approach has two major weaknesses: significant time and human resource investments, and lack of complete and error-free results. Objectives To introduce the algorithmic prediction of failure modes in healthcare (APFMH) and to examine whether APFMH is leaner in resource allocation in comparison to the traditional FMEA and whether it ensures the complete identification of hazards. Methods The patient identification during imaging process at the emergency department of Sheba Medical Center was analyzed by FMEA and APFMH, independently and separately. We compared between the hazards predicted by APFMH method and the hazards predicted by FMEA method; the total participants’ working hours invested in each process and the adverse events, categorized as ‘patient identification’, before and after the recommendations resulted from the above processes were implemented. Results APFMH is more effective in identifying hazards (P &lt; 0.0001) and is leaner in resources than the traditional FMEA: the former used 21 h whereas the latter required 63 h. Following the implementation of the recommendations, the adverse events decreased by 44% annually (P = 0.0026). Most adverse events were preventable, had all recommendations been fully implemented. Conclusion In light of our initial and limited-size study, APFMH is more effective in identifying hazards (P &lt; 0.0001) and is leaner in resources than the traditional FMEA. APFMH is suggested as an alternative to FMEA since it is leaner in time and human resources, ensures more complete hazard identification and is especially valuable during crisis time, when new protocols are often adopted, such as in the current days of the COVID-19 pandemic.


2021 ◽  
pp. 019459982198960
Author(s):  
Tiffany V. Wang ◽  
Nat Adamian ◽  
Phillip C. Song ◽  
Ramon A. Franco ◽  
Molly N. Huston ◽  
...  

Objectives (1) Demonstrate true vocal fold (TVF) tracking software (AGATI [Automated Glottic Action Tracking by artificial Intelligence]) as a quantitative assessment of unilateral vocal fold paralysis (UVFP) in a large patient cohort. (2) Correlate patient-reported metrics with AGATI measurements of TVF anterior glottic angles, before and after procedural intervention. Study Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting Academic medical center. Methods AGATI was used to analyze videolaryngoscopy from healthy adults (n = 72) and patients with UVFP (n = 70). Minimum, 3rd percentile, 97th percentile, and maximum anterior glottic angles (AGAs) were computed for each patient. In patients with UVFP, patient-reported outcomes (Voice Handicap Index 10, Dyspnea Index, and Eating Assessment Tool 10) were assessed, before and after procedural intervention (injection or medialization laryngoplasty). A receiver operating characteristic curve for the logistic fit of paralysis vs control group was used to determine AGA cutoff values for defining UVFP. Results Mean (SD) 3rd percentile AGA (in degrees) was 2.67 (3.21) in control and 5.64 (5.42) in patients with UVFP ( P < .001); mean (SD) 97th percentile AGA was 57.08 (11.14) in control and 42.59 (12.37) in patients with UVFP ( P < .001). For patients with UVFP who underwent procedural intervention, the mean 97th percentile AGA decreased by 5 degrees from pre- to postprocedure ( P = .026). The difference between the 97th and 3rd percentile AGA predicted UVFP with 77% sensitivity and 92% specificity ( P < .0001). There was no correlation between AGA measurements and patient-reported outcome scores. Conclusions AGATI demonstrated a difference in AGA measurements between paralysis and control patients. AGATI can predict UVFP with 77% sensitivity and 92% specificity.


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S667-S668
Author(s):  
Ann-Marie Idusuyi ◽  
Maureen Campion ◽  
Kathleen Belusko

Abstract Background The new ASHP/IDSA consensus guidelines recommend area under the curve (AUC) monitoring to optimize vancomycin therapy. Little is known about the ability to implement this recommendation in a real-world setting. At UMass Memorial Medical Center (UMMMC), an AUC pharmacy to dose protocol was created to manage infectious diseases (ID) consult patients on vancomycin. The service was piloted by the pharmacy residents and 2 clinical pharmacists. The purpose of this study was to determine if a pharmacy to dose AUC protocol can safely and effectively be implemented. Methods A first-order kinetics calculator was built into the electronic medical record and live education was provided to pharmacists. Pharmacists ordered levels, wrote progress notes, and communicated to teams regarding dose adjustments. Patients were included based upon ID consult and need for vancomycin. After a 3-month implementation period, a retrospective chart review was completed. Patients in the pre-implementation group were admitted 3 months prior to AUC pharmacy to dose, had an ID consult and were monitored by trough (TR) levels. The AUC group was monitored with a steady state peak and trough level to calculate AUC. The primary outcome evaluated time to goal AUC vs. time to goal TR. Secondary outcomes included number of dose adjustments made, total daily dose of vancomycin, and incidence of nephrotoxicity. Results A total of 64 patients met inclusion criteria, with 37 patients monitored by TR and 27 patients monitored by AUC. Baseline characteristics were similar except for weight in kilograms (TR 80.0 ±25.4 vs AUC 92.0 ±26.7; p=0.049). The average time to goal AUC was 4.13 (±2.08) days, and the average time to goal TR was 4.19 (±2.30) days (p=0.982). More dose adjustments occurred in the TR group compared to the AUC (1 vs 2; p=0.037). There was no difference between the two groups in dosing (TR 15.8 mg/kg vs AUC 16.4 mg/kg; p=0.788). Acute kidney injury occurred in 5 patients in the AUC group and 11 patients in the TR group (p=0.765). Conclusion Fewer dose adjustments and less nephrotoxicity was seen utilizing an AUC based protocol. Our small pilot has shown that AUC pharmacy to dose can be safely implemented. Larger studies are needed to evaluate reduction in time to therapeutic goals. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures


2021 ◽  
pp. 089719002199368
Author(s):  
Nicole M. Palm ◽  
Jill C. Wesolowski ◽  
Janet Y. Wu ◽  
Pavithra Srinivas

Medicinal leech therapy promotes vascular flow and can be used to salvage grafts. Medicinal leeches have a symbiotic relationship with Aeromonas species and can therefore present a risk of bacterial transmission to patients. Antimicrobial prophylaxis is warranted for the duration of leech therapy, however, an institutional evaluation of 40 patients receiving medicinal leech therapy demonstrated poor adherence with recommendations. An electronic medical record order panel for antimicrobial prophylaxis with medicinal leech therapy was implemented, leading to a subsequent improvement in adherence to prophylaxis use, including significant increases in the ordering of antibiotics and the appropriate timing of initiation in the subsequent 10 patients receiving medicinal leech therapy after panel implementation. Aeromonas infections were rare before and after panel implementation, and developed only in the patient subset with non-optimized prophylaxis.


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tilahun Fufa Debela ◽  
Zerihun Asefa Hordofa ◽  
Aster Berhe Aregawi ◽  
Demisew Amenu Sori

Abstract Background The consequences of obstetric fistula on affected women are more than the medical condition. It has extensive physical, psychological, social, and economic consequences on them. Obstetric fistula affects the entire health and entire life of women. Women suffering from obstetric fistula are often abandoned by her partner, relatives, and the community. This study aimed to determine the quality of life of obstetrics fistula patients before and after surgical repair. Methods Institutional-based prospective, before and after study design was conducted in the Jimma University Medical Center from November 1, 2019–October 30, 2020. A face-to-face interview was conducted with fistula patients who visited Jimma University Medical center, fistula clinic during the study period. All fistula patients were included in the study. Accordingly, 78 women who underwent surgical repair were interviewed. The means and the standard deviation were computed using conventional statistics formulas. The unpaired t-test was used to compare two independent means, and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare the quality of life before repair and after a successful repair. Linear regression analysis was done for identifying determinants of quality of life. A P value of 0.05 will be considered statistical significance. Result The overall quality of life of women was 58.17 ± 7.2 before the surgical repair and 71.20 ± 10.79 after surgical repair. The result indicates there is a significant difference in the mean value of pre and post-operative (P < 0.001). The overall satisfaction of women with their health status before the surgical repair was 22.5 ± 1.30and it has increased to 53.0 ± .90after surgical repair. The physical health dimension score was 16.51 ± 5.27 before the surgical repair while it has increased to 21.77 ± 5.38 after the surgical repair. The score of the social domain before the surgical repair was 5.19 ± 1.34 and it has increased to 7.13 ± 3.67 after the surgical repair. The score of the environmental health domain was 17.41 ± 2.89 before the surgery while it also increased to 21.65 ± 4.04 after the surgical repair. The results have shown there was a significant difference in the mean values of pre and post-operatives in both social and environmental scores (P < 0.001). The score of the psychological health domain before the surgery was 19.06 ± 1.46 and it was increased to 19.84 ± 3.21 after the surgical repair. The result showed there is a significant difference in mean value pre and post-operative (P = 0.048), though it is a slight improvement compared to other domains. Conclusion The overall quality of life of the patient with fistula was improved after successful surgical repair. Although all domains of quality of life had shown significant improvement after successful surgical repair, the psychological domain showed slight improvement.


2011 ◽  
Vol 145 (5) ◽  
pp. 853-857 ◽  
Author(s):  
Young Gyu Eun ◽  
Seung Youp Shin ◽  
Jae Yong Byun ◽  
Myung Gu Kim ◽  
Kun Hee Lee ◽  
...  

Objectives. To investigate the changes in gustatory function as a complication after radiofrequency tongue base reduction (RTBR) in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Study Design. Before-and-after study. Setting. Academic tertiary medical center. Subjects and Methods. Thirty-four patients with suspected velopharyngeal collapse only underwent uvulopalatopharyngoplasty (UPPP group). Twenty-five patients with velopharyngeal and retrolingual collapse underwent concurrent UPPP with RTBR (RTBR group). All patients were evaluated before surgery and at 1 and 4 weeks after surgical treatment. A questionnaire was given to assess symptoms of hypogeusia, dysgeusia, hyposmia, and sensation of the tongue. Electrogustometry (EGM) in 4 areas was used to determine gustatory function. Results. Postoperative values for subjective symptoms did not significantly change following surgical treatment in either group. EGM thresholds of all tested in both groups did not significantly change 1 week and 4 weeks after surgery. Conclusions. Gustatory function remained unchanged after RTBR in patients with OSA. The authors suggest that RTBR is a safe procedure in terms of taste sensation in OSA patients.


JAMIA Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 479-488
Author(s):  
Bryan D Steitz ◽  
Joseph Isaac S Wong ◽  
Jared G Cobb ◽  
Brian Carlson ◽  
Gaye Smith ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and Objective Patient portal use has increased over the last two decades in response to consumer demand and government regulation. Despite growing adoption, few guidelines exist to direct successful implementation and governance. We describe the policies and procedures that have governed over a decade of continuous My Health at Vanderbilt (MHAV) patient portal use. Methods We examined MHAV usage data between May 2007 and November 2017. We classified patient portal activity into eight functional categories: Appointment, Billing, Document Access, Genetics, Health Result, Immunization, Medication, and Messaging. We describe our operating policies and measure portal uptake, patient account activity, and function use over time. Results By the end of the study period, there were 375 517 registered accounts. Policies made MHAV available to competent adults and adolescents 13 and over. Patients signed up for a limited access account online, which could be upgraded to a full-access account after identity verification. Patients could assign proxy accounts to family and caregivers, which permitted nonpatient access to select MHAV functions. Laboratory and radiology results were accessible via MHAV. Results were classified into three groups based on sensitivity, which govern the length of delay before results appeared in MHAV. Discussion and Conclusion Patient portals offer significant opportunity to engage patients in their healthcare. However, there remains a need to understand how policies can promote uptake and use. We anticipate that other institutions can apply concepts from our policies to support meaningful patient portal engagement.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document