scholarly journals Complaint-Directed Mini-Interventions for Depressive Symptoms: A Health-Economic Evaluation of Unguided Web-Based Self-Help Interventions (Preprint)

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ben F.M. Wijnen ◽  
Suzanne Lokman ◽  
Stephanie Leone ◽  
Silvia M.A.A. Evers ◽  
Filip Smit

BACKGROUND The past decades depression prevention and early intervention has become a top priority within the Netherlands, however, there is still considerable room for improvement. To this extent, web-based complaint-directed mini-interventions (CDMIs) were developed. These brief and low-threshold interventions focus on psychological stress, sleep problems, and worry, because these complaints are highly prevalent, are demonstrably associated with depression and have a substantial economic impact. OBJECTIVE Aim of the current economic evaluation is to examine the added value of web-based unguided self-help CDMIs as compared to a wait-listed control group with unrestricted access to usual care both from a societal and healthcare perspective. METHODS This health economic evaluation was embedded in a randomized controlled trial. The study entailed two-arms in which three web-based CMDIs were compared to a no-intervention waiting-list control group (control group received intervention at three months follow-up). Measurements were conducted at baseline, and at three- and six-months follow-up. Primary outcome of the study was response rate on depressive symptomatology as measured by the Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self-Report (IDS-SR). Change in quality of life was estimated by calculating effect sizes (Cohens’ d) for individual pre- and post-treatment IDS-SR scores. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated using bootstraps (5000 times) of seemingly unrelated regression equations and cost-effectiveness acceptability curves were constructed for the costs per QALY gained. RESULTS In total, 329 participants were included in the study of which 165 randomized to the CDMI group. At three months follow-up the responder rate was 13.9% in the CDMI group and 7.3% in the control group. Participants in the CDMI group gained 0.15 QALY at three months follow-up compared to baseline, whereas participants in the control group gained 0.03 QALY at three months follow-up. Average total costs per patient during 3 months follow-up were €2,094 for the CDMI group and €2,230 for the control group (excluding baseline costs). Bootstrapped SURE models resulted in a dominant ICER (i.e. less costs and a higher responder rate) for the CDMI group compared to the control group at three months follow-up. The same result was found for the costs per QALY gained. Various sensitivity analyses attested to the robustness of the findings of the main analysis. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrated that brief and low-threshold web-based unguided self-help CDMIs have the potential to be a cost-effective addition to usual care for adults with mild-to-moderate depressive symptoms. The CDMIs were shown to improve health status while at the same time reduced healthcare costs of participants and hence dominates the care as usual control condition. As intervention costs are relatively low, and Internet is nowadays readily available in the Western world, we believe the CDMIs can be easily implemented on a large scale. CLINICALTRIAL Netherlands Trial Register (NTR): NTR4612; http://www.trialregister.nl/trialreg/admin/rctview.asp?TC=4612 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6n4PVYddM)

2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 380-387
Author(s):  
Sarah Fontenay ◽  
Lionel Catarino ◽  
Soumeya Snoussi ◽  
Hélène van den Brink ◽  
Judith Pineau ◽  
...  

ObjectiveBecause of a lack of suitable heart donors, alternatives to transplantation are required. These alternatives can have high costs. The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review of cost-effectiveness studies of ventricular assist devices (VADs) and to assess the level of evidence of relevant studies. The purpose was not to present economic findings.MethodsA systematic review was performed using four electronic databases to identify health economic evaluation studies dealing with VADs. The methodological quality and reporting quality of the studies was assessed using three different tools, the Drummond, Cooper, and CHEERS (Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards) checklists.ResultsOf the 1,258 publications identified, thirteen articles were included in this review. Twelve studies were cost–utility analyses and one was a cost-effectiveness analysis. According to the Cooper hierarchy scale, the quality of the data used was heterogeneous. The level of evidence used for clinical effect sizes, safety data, and baseline clinical data was of poor quality. In contrast, cost data were of high quality in most studies. Quality of reporting varied between studies, with an average score of 17.4 (range 15–19) according to the CHEERS checklist.ConclusionThe current study shows that the quality of clinical data used in economic evaluations of VADs is rather poor in general. This is a concern that deserves greater attention in the process of health technology assessment of medical devices.


2009 ◽  
Vol 48 (1) ◽  
pp. 99-104 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ingalill Koinberg ◽  
G.-B. Engholm ◽  
A. Genell ◽  
L. Holmberg

10.2196/21200 ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. e21200
Author(s):  
Julia Katharina Hegy ◽  
Noemi Anja Brog ◽  
Thomas Berger ◽  
Hansjoerg Znoj

Background Accidents and the resulting injuries are among the world’s biggest health care issues, often causing long-term effects on psychological and physical health. With regard to psychological consequences, accidents can cause a wide range of burdens including adjustment problems. Although adjustment problems are among the most frequent mental health problems, there are few specific interventions available. The newly developed program SelFIT (German acronym: Selber wieder fit nach einem Unfall; “fit again after an accident”) aims to remedy this situation by offering a low-threshold, web-based self-help intervention for psychological distress after an accident. Objective The overall aim is to evaluate the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of the SelFIT program plus care as usual (CAU) compared to only CAU. Furthermore, the program’s user-friendliness, acceptance, and adherence are assessed. We expect that the use of SelFIT will be associated with a greater reduction in psychological distress, greater improvement in mental and physical well-being, and greater cost-effectiveness compared to CAU. Methods Adults (n=240) experiencing adjustment problems due to an accident they had between 2 weeks and 2 years before entering the study will be randomized into either the intervention or control group. Participants in the intervention group receive direct access to SelFIT. The control group receives access to the program after 12 weeks. There are 6 measurement points for both groups (baseline as well as after 4, 8, 12, 24, and 36 weeks). The main outcome is a reduction in anxiety, depression, and stress symptoms that indicate adjustment problems. Secondary outcomes include well-being, optimism, embitterment, self-esteem, self-efficacy, emotion regulation, pain, costs of health care consumption, and productivity loss, as well as the program’s adherence, acceptance, and user-friendliness. Results Recruitment began in December 2019 and will continue at least until January 2021, with the option to extend this for another 6 months until July 2021. As of July 2020, 324 people have shown interest in participating, and 48 people have given their informed consent. Conclusions To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study examining a web-based self-help program designed to treat adjustment problems resulting from an accident. If effective, the program could complement the still limited offerings for secondary and tertiary prevention of psychological distress after an accident. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03785912; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03785912 International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) DERR1-10.2196/21200


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document