scholarly journals The Monthly Labor Review at 100—part II: the “middle years,” 1930–80

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian Baker
Keyword(s):  
Monthly Labor Review ◽  
Middle Years

Henry Adams: The Middle Years

1959 ◽  
Vol 54 (4) ◽  
pp. 601
Author(s):  
Carl Bode ◽  
Ernest Samuels
Keyword(s):  
Henry Adams ◽  
Middle Years

Religion and Well-Being: Men and Women in the Middle Years

1988 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 281 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fern K. Willits ◽  
Donald M. Crider
Keyword(s):  
Well Being ◽  
Middle Years ◽  
Men And Women

Middle Years at School

1972 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 163-164
Author(s):  
Peter Mitchell
Keyword(s):  
Middle Years

I. ‘Delenda est Carthago’

1946 ◽  
Vol 8 (03) ◽  
pp. 117-128 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. E. Adcock
Keyword(s):  
Second Century ◽  
Moral Issue ◽  
Main Question ◽  
Middle Years ◽  
Scipio Africanus

The odious behaviour of the Romans in the events that led to the destruction of Carthage has earned the condemnation of historians who see in it, as they have a right to do, a moral issue. The unattractiveness of the Carthaginians, whose history has been written for us by their enemies, is no defence: the bad name does not justify this execution. But the problem remains why the Senate acted as it did, and the examination of it may throw light on Roman policy and the temper of the Roman mind in the middle years of the second century. We need not suppose that the Senate decided to destroy Carthage rather than listen any longer to Cato ending all hissententiaein the Curia with the words ‘ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam’. The motives that led Cato, who after Pydna had spoken up for the Rhodians and apparently had quoted with approval a plea of Scipio Africanus against the destruction of Carthage after Zama, to urge the destruction of Carthage axe part of the investigation. But the main question is why the Senate in the end adopted his policy, if policy it can be called.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document