scholarly journals NEITHER A RESPONSE NOR STIMULUS SET-SIZE EFFECT FOUND IN THE MANUAL STROOP TASK

2014 ◽  
Vol 56 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-35
Author(s):  
Adam Chuderski ◽  
◽  
Tomasz Smoleń ◽  
Maciej Taraday ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Size Effect ◽  
Stroop Task ◽  
Set Size ◽  
Stimulus Set

scholarly journals Spatial resolution underlies the set size effect in conjunction search

2010 ◽  
Vol 2 (7) ◽  
pp. 538-538
Author(s):  
K. S. Frieder ◽  
M. Carrasco
Keyword(s):  
Size Effect ◽  
Spatial Resolution ◽  
Conjunction Search ◽  
Set Size

A PDP approach to set size effects within the Stroop task: Reply to Kanne, Balota, Spieler, and Faust (1998).

1998 ◽  
Vol 105 (1) ◽  
pp. 188-194 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan D. Cohen ◽  
Marius Usher ◽  
James L. McClelland
Keyword(s):  
Stroop Task ◽  
Size Effects ◽  
Set Size ◽  
Set Size Effects

scholarly journals Stimulus set size modulates the sex–emotion interaction in face categorization

2015 ◽  
Vol 77 (4) ◽  
pp. 1285-1294 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ottmar V. Lipp ◽  
Fika Karnadewi ◽  
Belinda M. Craig ◽  
Sophie L. Cronin
Keyword(s):  
Set Size ◽  
Stimulus Set ◽  
Face Categorization

Capacity Limitation in Short-Term Visual Memory for Contour Curvature

Perception ◽  
10.1068/p3365 ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 34 (9) ◽  
pp. 1095-1105 ◽  
Author(s):  
Koji Sakai
Keyword(s):  
Size Effect ◽  
Visual Memory ◽  
Weber Fraction ◽  
Short Exposure ◽  
Difference Threshold ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Capacity Limitation ◽  
Set Size ◽  
Short Term Visual Memory ◽  
Contour Curvature

I measured the difference threshold for contour curvature in short-term visual memory (STVM) using a two-interval forced-choice partial discrimination task. In experiments 1 and 2, the study stimulus consisting of 1 to 4 curved contours was briefly presented. It was followed by a single contour stimulus after a retention interval. The subjects judged if the test stimulus had a higher or lower curvature than the corresponding study contour. The results of experiment 1 showed that the Weber fraction increased monotonically with increasing set size. The results of experiment 2 clarified that the set-size effect was not due to a temporal limitation in encoding resulting from the short exposure time. In experiment 3, the study stimuli always consisted of 4 items, but the numbers of memorised items were different in each condition. Nevertheless, the results showed the set-size effect, which indicated that its occurrence depended largely on the capacity limitation in short-term visual memory (STVM) storage. Otherwise, the Weber fraction was not hugely higher for set size 4 compared with set size 1. It was concluded that only 1 object could be retained in STVM with high fidelity, but that at least 4 objects could be retained in STVM with some degree of fidelity.

The effects of stimulus set size and word frequency on verbal serial recall

Memory ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 71-78 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven Roodenrys ◽  
Philip T. Quinlan
Keyword(s):  
Word Frequency ◽  
Serial Recall ◽  
Set Size ◽  
Stimulus Set

scholarly journals The Reference Frame for Encoding and Retention of Motion-Direction Information Depends on Stimulus Set-size

2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (10) ◽  
pp. 436
Author(s):  
Haluk Ogmen ◽  
Duong Huynh ◽  
Srimant Tripathy ◽  
Harold Bedell
Keyword(s):  
Reference Frame ◽  
Motion Direction ◽  
Set Size ◽  
Stimulus Set ◽  
Direction Information

scholarly journals Stimulus probability and stimulus set size in memory scanning.

1974 ◽  
Vol 102 (6) ◽  
pp. 1100-1107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irving Biederman ◽  
E. Webb Stacy
Keyword(s):  
Stimulus Probability ◽  
Memory Scanning ◽  
Set Size ◽  
Stimulus Set
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document