scholarly journals Stimulus probability and stimulus set size in memory scanning.

1974 ◽  
Vol 102 (6) ◽  
pp. 1100-1107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irving Biederman ◽  
E. Webb Stacy
2015 ◽  
Vol 77 (4) ◽  
pp. 1285-1294 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ottmar V. Lipp ◽  
Fika Karnadewi ◽  
Belinda M. Craig ◽  
Sophie L. Cronin

Memory ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 71-78 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven Roodenrys ◽  
Philip T. Quinlan

2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (10) ◽  
pp. 436
Author(s):  
Haluk Ogmen ◽  
Duong Huynh ◽  
Srimant Tripathy ◽  
Harold Bedell

1975 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 20-22
Author(s):  
Gary Thorson

An experiment investigated the notion that organizational properties operate in a memory-scanning task using cutaneous stimuli. The results indicated that the open-closed nature of the positive set is a significant factor in a cutaneous memory-scanning task. Set-size was not a significant factor. The data suggest there are some organizational processes in a cutaneous memory-scanning cask, however, these processes do not seem to be completely analogous to those used in visual and auditory memory-scanning tasks.


1970 ◽  
Vol 6 (5) ◽  
pp. 601-608 ◽  
Author(s):  
Israel Lieblich ◽  
Sol Kugelmass ◽  
Gershox Ben-Shakhar
Keyword(s):  
Set Size ◽  

2014 ◽  
Vol 56 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-35
Author(s):  
Adam Chuderski ◽  
◽  
Tomasz Smoleń ◽  
Maciej Taraday ◽  
◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 79 (3) ◽  
pp. 888-910 ◽  
Author(s):  
Duong Huynh ◽  
Srimant P. Tripathy ◽  
Harold E. Bedell ◽  
Haluk Öğmen

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document