Document-Based Decision Making and Design: An Analysis of Medicare Part D

2010 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 283-310 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eva R. Brumberger
2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Betty E. Tanius ◽  
Stacey Wood ◽  
Yaniv Hanoch ◽  
Thomas Rice ◽  
Martina Ly ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tao Jin ◽  
Richard R. Cline ◽  
Ronald S. Hadsall

Objectives: The objective of this study was to elicit salient beliefs among pre-Medicare eligible individuals regarding (1) the outcomes associated with enrolling in the Medicare Part D program; (2) those referents who might influence participants' decisions about enrolling in the Part D program; and (3) the perceived barriers and facilitators facing those considering enrolling in the Part D program. Methods: Focused interviews were used for collecting data. A sample of 10 persons between 62 and 64 years of age not otherwise enrolled in the Medicare program was recruited. Interviews were audio taped and field notes were taken concurrently. Audio recordings were reviewed to amend field notes until obtaining a thorough reflection of interviews. Field notes were analyzed to elicit a group of beliefs, which were coded into perceived outcomes, the relevant others who might influence Medicare Part D enrollment decisions and perceived facilitators and impediments. By extracting those most frequently mentioned beliefs, modal salient sets of behavioral beliefs, relevant referents, and control beliefs were identified. Results: Analyses showed that (1) most pre-Medicare eligible believed that Medicare Part D could "provide drug coverage", "save money on medications", and "provide financial and health security in later life". However, "monthly premiums", "the formulary with limited drug coverage" and "the complexity of Medicare Part D" were perceived as major disadvantages; (2) immediate family members are most likely to influence pre-Medicare eligible's decisions about Medicare Part D enrollment; and (3) internet and mailing educational brochures are considered to be most useful resources for Medicare Part D enrollment. Major barriers to enrollment included the complexity and inadequacy of insurance plan information. Conclusion: There are multiple factors related to decision-making surrounding the Medicare Part D enrollment. These factors include the advantages and disadvantages of enrolling in Part D, facilitators and barriers to enrolling in Medicare Part D, and significant individuals and groups for pre-Medicare eligible individuals. Type: Original Research


2011 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 295-307 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stacey Wood ◽  
Yaniv Hanoch ◽  
Andrew Barnes ◽  
Pi-Ju Liu ◽  
Janet Cummings ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 75 (6) ◽  
pp. 721-745 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jayoung Han ◽  
Julie Urmie

Medicare Part D beneficiaries tend not to switch plans despite the government’s efforts to engage beneficiaries in the plan switching process. Understanding current and alternative plan features is a necessary step to make informed plan switching decisions. This study explored beneficiaries’ plan switching using a mixed-methods approach, with a focus on the concept of information processing. We found large variation in beneficiary comprehension of plan information among both switchers and nonswitchers. Knowledge about alternative plans was especially poor, with only about half of switchers and 2 in 10 nonswitchers being well informed about plans other than their current plan. We also found that helpers had a prominent role in plan decision making—nearly twice as many switchers as nonswitchers worked with helpers for their plan selection. Our study suggests that easier access to helpers as well as helpers’ extensive involvement in the decision-making process promote informed plan switching decisions.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. e77096 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew J. Barnes ◽  
Yaniv Hanoch ◽  
Melissa Martynenko ◽  
Stacey Wood ◽  
Thomas Rice ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. A170-A171
Author(s):  
JW Hales ◽  
S Dudley ◽  
A Hegamin ◽  
N Poulios ◽  
K Mills

2016 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 12-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carrie Henning-Smith ◽  
Michelle Casey ◽  
Ira Moscovice

2006 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
MARY ELLEN SCHNEIDER

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document