Too much choice: Older adults' decision making related to Medicare part D

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Betty E. Tanius ◽  
Stacey Wood ◽  
Yaniv Hanoch ◽  
Thomas Rice ◽  
Martina Ly ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 383 (24) ◽  
pp. 2299-2301
Author(s):  
Stacie B. Dusetzina ◽  
Benyam Muluneh ◽  
Nancy L. Keating ◽  
Haiden A. Huskamp

2009 ◽  
Vol 49 (6) ◽  
pp. 828-838 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. A. Skarupski ◽  
C. F. Mendes de Leon ◽  
L. L. Barnes ◽  
D. A. Evans

2011 ◽  
Vol 19 (12) ◽  
pp. 989-997 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julie M. Donohue ◽  
Yuting Zhang ◽  
Subashan Perera ◽  
Judith R. Lave ◽  
Joseph T. Hanlon ◽  
...  

Medical Care ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 48 (5) ◽  
pp. 409-417 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuting Zhang ◽  
Judith R. Lave ◽  
Julie M. Donohue ◽  
Michael A. Fischer ◽  
Michael E. Chernew ◽  
...  

Diabetes Care ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 40 (4) ◽  
pp. 502-508 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoon Jeong Choi ◽  
Haomiao Jia ◽  
Tal Gross ◽  
Katie Weinger ◽  
Patricia W. Stone ◽  
...  

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. e053717
Author(s):  
Minghui Li ◽  
Jing Yuan ◽  
Chelsea Dezfuli ◽  
Z Kevin Lu

ObjectiveBenzodiazepines were excluded from Medicare Part D coverage since its introduction in 2006. Part D expanded coverage for benzodiazepines in 2013. The objective was to examine the impact of Medicare Part D coverage expansion on the utilisation and financial burden of benzodiazepines in older adults.DesignInterrupted time series with a control group.SettingNationally representative sample.Participants53 150 468 users of benzodiazepines and 21 749 749 users of non-benzodiazepines (an alternative therapy) from the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey between the pre-expansion (2006–2012) and post-expansion (2013–2017) periods.InterventionMedicare Part D coverage expansion on benzodiazepines.Primary and secondary outcome measuresAnnual rate of benzodiazepines and non-benzodiazepines, average number of benzodiazepines and non-benzodiazepines and average cost of benzodiazepines and non-benzodiazepines.ResultsAfter Medicare Part D coverage expansion, the level of the annual rate of benzodiazepines increased by 8.20% (95% CI: 6.07% to 10.32%) and the trend decreased by 1.03% each year (95% CI: −1.77% to −0.29%). The trend of the annual rate of non-benzodiazepines decreased by 0.72% each year (95% CI: −1.11% to −0.33%). For the average number of benzodiazepines, the level increased by 0.67 (95% CI: 0.52 to 0.82) and the trend decreased by 0.10 each year (95% CI: −0.15 to –0.05). For the average number of non-benzodiazepines, the level decreased by 0.11 (95% CI: −0.21 to –0.01) and the trend decreased by 0.04 each year (95% CI: −0.08 to –0.01). No significant level and trend changes were identified for the average cost of benzodiazepines and non-benzodiazepines.ConclusionsAfter Medicare Part D coverage expansion, there was a sudden increase in the utilisation of benzodiazepines and a decreasing trend in the long-term. The increase in the utilisation of benzodiazepines did not add a financial burden to older adults. As an alternative therapy, the utilisation of non-benzodiazepines decreased following the coverage expansion.


2010 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tao Jin ◽  
Richard R. Cline ◽  
Ronald S. Hadsall

Objectives: The objective of this study was to elicit salient beliefs among pre-Medicare eligible individuals regarding (1) the outcomes associated with enrolling in the Medicare Part D program; (2) those referents who might influence participants' decisions about enrolling in the Part D program; and (3) the perceived barriers and facilitators facing those considering enrolling in the Part D program. Methods: Focused interviews were used for collecting data. A sample of 10 persons between 62 and 64 years of age not otherwise enrolled in the Medicare program was recruited. Interviews were audio taped and field notes were taken concurrently. Audio recordings were reviewed to amend field notes until obtaining a thorough reflection of interviews. Field notes were analyzed to elicit a group of beliefs, which were coded into perceived outcomes, the relevant others who might influence Medicare Part D enrollment decisions and perceived facilitators and impediments. By extracting those most frequently mentioned beliefs, modal salient sets of behavioral beliefs, relevant referents, and control beliefs were identified. Results: Analyses showed that (1) most pre-Medicare eligible believed that Medicare Part D could "provide drug coverage", "save money on medications", and "provide financial and health security in later life". However, "monthly premiums", "the formulary with limited drug coverage" and "the complexity of Medicare Part D" were perceived as major disadvantages; (2) immediate family members are most likely to influence pre-Medicare eligible's decisions about Medicare Part D enrollment; and (3) internet and mailing educational brochures are considered to be most useful resources for Medicare Part D enrollment. Major barriers to enrollment included the complexity and inadequacy of insurance plan information. Conclusion: There are multiple factors related to decision-making surrounding the Medicare Part D enrollment. These factors include the advantages and disadvantages of enrolling in Part D, facilitators and barriers to enrolling in Medicare Part D, and significant individuals and groups for pre-Medicare eligible individuals. Type: Original Research


2016 ◽  
Vol 48 (1) ◽  
pp. 42-56 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cheng-Chia Chen ◽  
Hsien-Chang Lin ◽  
Dong-Chul Seo

This study examined the effect of Medicare (Part D) implementation on health outcomes among U.S. older adults. Study participants were initially extracted from the 2004–2008 Health and Retirement Study (HRS). Data from respondents who further participated in the HRS 2005–2007 Prescription Drug Study were analyzed (N = 746). This was a retrospective pre-post design with a treatment and a control group. The difference-in-differences approach with panel ordered logistic regressions was used to examine the Part D effect on three patient health outcomes before and after the implementation, controlling for patient sociodemographic characteristics. People with continuous Part D enrollment from 2006–2008 were less likely to have a worse self-rated health than those who were not enrolled in Part D (odds ratio [OR] = 0.48; p < .05). A higher Charlson Comorbidity Index score was associated with a higher likelihood of having worse self-rated overall health, worse mental health, and worse activities of daily living impairment (ORs = 1.12, 1.17, and 1.36, respectively; all ps < .001). The Part D implementation appears to have a positive effect on older adults’ overall health outcomes. A decrease in out-of-pocket cost for health care may encourage older adults to utilize more needed medications, which in turn helped maintain better health.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document