scholarly journals The Impact of Educational Intervention Programs to Promoting Mammography Screening: A Systematic Review

2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 58-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seyed Mohammad Mehdi Hazavehei ◽  
Khadije Ezzati Rastegar ◽  
Mitra Dogonchi ◽  
Nooshin Salimi ◽  
Elham Gheisvandi
2006 ◽  
Vol 60 (7) ◽  
pp. 299-302 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arie Augarten ◽  
Ruth Zaslansky ◽  
Ilan Matok Pharm ◽  
Tal Minuskin ◽  
Liat Lerner-Geva ◽  
...  

ISRN Obesity ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rosa Cataldo ◽  
Janice John ◽  
Latha Chandran ◽  
Susmita Pati ◽  
A. Laurie W. Shroyer

Lack of physical activity has contributed to the nation’s childhood obesity crisis, but the impact of physical activity on self-efficacy as a mediator of behavior change has not been examined. This systematic review (SR) describes the published evidence related to the impact of physical activity intervention programs on self-efficacy among youths. From January 2000 to June 2011, the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) standards were used to identify publications from PubMed, PsychInfo, Web of Knowledge, and the Cochran Database of Systematic Reviews. The Cochrane Population, Intervention, Control, Outcome, Study Design (PICOS) approach guided this SR articles selection and evaluation process. Of the 102 publications screened, 10 original studies matched the SR inclusion criteria. The types of physical activity interventions and self-efficacy assessments for these 10 studies were diverse. Of the 10 included articles, 6 articles identified an improvement in post-self-efficacy assessments compared to baseline and 4 showed no effect. In conclusion, physical activity intervention programs may improve self-efficacy in youths. A standardized approach to classify and measure self-efficacy is required. Further research is needed to quantify the association of self-efficacy ratings after completing physical activity interventions with objective health improvements, such as weight loss.


2018 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-77 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carina Van Rooyen ◽  
Ruth Stewart ◽  
Thea De Wet

Big international development donors such as the UK’s Department for International Development and USAID have recently started using systematic review as a methodology to assess the effectiveness of various development interventions to help them decide what is the ‘best’ intervention to spend money on. Such an approach to evidence-based decision-making has long been practiced in the health sector in the US, UK, and elsewhere but it is relatively new in the development field. In this article we use the case of a systematic review of the impact of microfinance on the poor in sub-Saharan African to indicate how systematic review as a methodology can be used to assess the impact of specific development interventions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document