scholarly journals Monitoring and evaluation plan for the Nez Perce Tribal Hatchery

1996 ◽  
Author(s):  
C.R. Steward
Keyword(s):  
Monitoring And Evaluation ◽  
Nez Perce ◽  
Evaluation Plan

Educate! Developing a Theory of Change for “Changemakers”

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary Kay Gugerty ◽  
Dean Karlan
Keyword(s):  
Change Process ◽  
Evaluation System ◽  
Program Design ◽  
Field Research ◽  
Monitoring And Evaluation ◽  
Theory Of Change ◽  
Youth Empowerment ◽  
Evaluation Plan ◽  
Final Theory

A theory of change can build consensus on a program’s vision and guide the development of a right-fit monitoring and evaluation system. This case examines how the Uganda-based youth empowerment NGO Educate! used the theory of change process to clearly define its intended impact and decide how to measure it. After analyzing the process Educate! used to develop its theory of change, readers will be able to discuss the value of gathering internal perspectives and conducting field research to develop a theory of change. Readers will also assess how successive iterations of the theory of change provide clarity on program design and objectives and determine whether the final theory of change is sufficient to design a monitoring and evaluation plan that adheres to CART principles.

A Monitoring and Evaluation Plan for Alcoholism Programs

Addiction ◽  
1976 ◽  
Vol 71 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward Helmick ◽  
Sheldon I. Miller ◽  
Paul Nutting ◽  
Gregory Shorr ◽  
Lawrence Berg
Keyword(s):  
Monitoring And Evaluation ◽  
Evaluation Plan

scholarly journals Salmon Plan Wins Environmental Award

2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Margaret Merritt
Keyword(s):  
Analytic Hierarchy Process ◽  
Monitoring And Evaluation ◽  
Annual Convention ◽  
Cook Inlet ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy ◽  
Evaluation Plan ◽  
The Analytic Hierarchy Process ◽  
Hierarchy Process ◽  
Goals And Objectives

The Matanuska-Susitna (Mat-Su) Salmon Research, Monitoring and Evaluation Plan for Upper Cook Inlet, Alaska was the winner in the Environmental category of the Alaska Chapter, American Planning Association (APA) 2015 Awards program. The plan, which used the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to identify, structure and prioritize specific issues related to program goals and objectives, was showcased in November, 2015 during the APA’s annual convention in Anchorage, Alaska.https://doi.org/10.13033/ijahp.v9i3.512

scholarly journals Six years of lessons learned in monitoring and evaluating online discussion forums

2011 ◽  
pp. 621-643
Keyword(s):  
Reproductive Health ◽  
Health Information ◽  
Monitoring And Evaluation ◽  
Lessons Learned ◽  
World Health ◽  
Discussion Forums ◽  
Evaluation Plan ◽  
The World ◽  
Information Products ◽  
Health Organization

This paper presents the plan for evaluating virtual discussion forums held on the Implementing Best Practices in Reproductive Health (IBP) Knowledge Gateway, and its evolution over six years. Since 2005, the World Health Organization Department of Reproductive Health and Research (WHO/RHR), the Knowledge for Health (K4Health) Project based at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health’s Center for Communication Programs (JHU∙CCP), and partners of the IBP Initiative have supported more than 50 virtual discussion forums on the IBP Knowledge Gateway. These discussions have provided global health practitioners with a platform to exchange evidence-based information and knowledge with colleagues working around the world. In this paper, the authors discuss challenges related to evaluating virtual discussions and present their evaluation plan for virtual discussions. The evaluation plan included the following three stages: (I) determining value of the discussion forums, (II) in-depth exploration of the data, and (III) reflection and next steps and was guided by the “Conceptual Framework for Monitoring and Evaluating Health Information Products and Services” which was published as part of the Guide to Monitoring and Evaluation of Health Information Products and Services. An analysis of data from 26 forums is presented and discussed in light of this framework. The paper also includes next steps for improving the evaluation of future virtual discussions.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document