scholarly journals Instrumentation report 1: specification, design, calibration, and installation of instrumentation for an experimental, high-level, nuclear waste storage facility

10.2172/59241 ◽  
1982 ◽  
Author(s):  
W.G. Brough ◽  
W.C. Patrick
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Waste ◽  
Storage Facility ◽  
Nuclear Waste Storage ◽  
Waste Storage ◽  
High Level Nuclear Waste ◽  
High Level

scholarly journals Selection of Barrier Metals for a Waste Package in Tuff

1983 ◽  
Vol 26 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. W. yyRussell ◽  
R. D. McCright ◽  
W. C. O'Neal
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Waste ◽  
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory ◽  
Near Field ◽  
National Laboratory ◽  
Test Site ◽  
Management Program ◽  
Nuclear Waste Storage ◽  
Waste Storage ◽  
High Level ◽  
Selection Of

ABSTRACTThe Nevada Nuclear Waste Storage Investigations (NNWSI) project under the Civilian Radioactive Waste Management Program is planning a repository at Yucca Mountain at the Nevada Test Site for isolation of high-level nuclear waste. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory is developing designs for an engineered barrier system containing several barriers such as the waste form, a canister and/or an overpack, packing, and near field host rock. In this paper we address the selection of metal containment barriers.

Consolidated nuclear waste storage in Andrews, Texas: An integrated technical and policy risk analysis

2021 ◽  
pp. 0958305X2110513
Author(s):  
Adam J. Mallette ◽  
Aparajita Datta ◽  
Ramanan Krishnamoorti
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Waste ◽  
Spent Nuclear Fuel ◽  
Nuclear Industry ◽  
Successful Implementation ◽  
Storage Facility ◽  
Spent Fuel ◽  
Nuclear Waste Storage ◽  
Waste Storage ◽  
Interim Storage ◽  
The Impact

Over the last 50 years, nuclear energy has reduced US energy-related CO2 emissions by over 30 gigatons compared to if the same electricity were produced by fossil fuels such as coal and natural gas. However, many kilotons of spent nuclear fuel have accumulated at different sites across the country, and sociopolitical factors have frustrated efforts to address the challenge of nuclear waste disposal. Presently, a consolidated interim storage facility in Andrews, Texas, provides a promising temporary solution. In this paper, we compare the technical and policy risks of the project to continued storage at independent spent fuel storage installations. Our results indicate that the cost of the radiological risk is low (<$30,000) for both scenarios. However, policy and societal considerations will impact the viability of the proposed consolidated interim storage facility. The safety and suitability of this interim storage facility will be affected by when a permanent repository becomes available, whether insurance for offsite waste storage is available, and the impact of climate risks. Although a consolidated interim storage facility at Andrews can potentially serve as a safe and economically advantageous solution, we highlight why these concerns must be addressed for the successful implementation of this facility, and more broadly for the future of the US nuclear industry.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document