scholarly journals Structural review of the Palisades Nuclear Power Plant Unit 1 containment structure under combined loads for the Systematic Evaluation Program

1981 ◽  
Author(s):  
C.Y. Liaw ◽  
A. Debeling ◽  
N.C. Tsai
Keyword(s):  
Power Plant ◽  
Nuclear Power Plant ◽  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Systematic Evaluation ◽  
Evaluation Program ◽  
Combined Loads ◽  
Nuclear Power Plant Unit

Risk Based Inspection Pilot Study of Ignalina Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 2

2002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bjorn Brickstad ◽  
Adam Letzter ◽  
Arturas Klimasauskas ◽  
Robertas Alzbutas ◽  
Linas Nedzinskas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Pilot Study ◽  
Power Plant ◽  
Nuclear Power Plant ◽  
Fracture Mechanics ◽  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Damage Mechanism ◽  
Core Damage ◽  
Steel Welds ◽  
Nuclear Power Plant Unit

A project with the acronym IRBIS (Ignalina Risk Based Inspection pilot Study) has been performed with the objective to perform a quantitative risk analysis of a total of 1240 stainless steel welds in Ignalina Nuclear Power Plant, unit 2 (INPP-2). The damage mechanism is IGSCC and the failure probabilities are quantified by using probabilistic fracture mechanics. The conditional core damage probabilities are taken from the plant PSA.

Accident Analysis of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant Unit 2 by the SAMPSON Severe Accident Code

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Atsuo Takahashi ◽  
Marco Pellegrini ◽  
Hideo Mizouchi ◽  
Hiroaki Suzuki ◽  
Masanori Naitoh
Keyword(s):  
Power Plant ◽  
Nuclear Power Plant ◽  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Cooling System ◽  
Severe Accident ◽  
Accident Analysis ◽  
Unknown Boundary ◽  
Long Time ◽  
Fukushima Daiichi ◽  
Nuclear Power Plant Unit

The transient process of the accident at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant Unit 2 was analyzed by the severe accident analysis code, SAMPSON. One of the characteristic phenomena in Unit 2 is that the reactor core isolation cooling system (RCIC) worked for an unexpectedly long time (about 70 h) without batteries and consequently core damage was delayed when compared to Units 1 and 3. The mechanism of how the RCIC worked such a long time is thought to be due to balance between injected water from the RCIC pump and the supplied mixture of steam and water sent to the RCIC turbine. To confirm the RCIC working conditions and reproduce the measured plant properties, such as pressure and water level in the pressure vessel, we introduced a two-phase turbine driven pump model into SAMPSON. In the model, mass flow rate of water injected by the RCIC was calculated through turbine efficiency degradation the originated from the mixture of steam and water flowing to the RCIC turbine. To reproduce the drywell pressure, we assumed that the torus room was flooded by the tsunami and heat was removed from the suppression chamber to the sea water. Although uncertainties, mainly regarding behavior of debris, still remain because of unknown boundary conditions, such as alternative water injection by fire trucks, simulation results by SAMPSON agreed well with the measured values for several days after the scram.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document